DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
MEH:dcl_j
Docket No: 204-02
14 May 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section
1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
I4 May 2002. Your allegations of error and
session, considered your application on
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by
attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
NPC memorandum 1 160 Ser 81 11094 of
IS April 2002, a copy of which is
iI?justice
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. The Board cannot authorize payment of money a member is not entitled to. It is
unfortunate you were erroneously provided the incorrect amount of Selective Reenlistment Bonus
cat1 do in this situation. As noted in the
(SRB) you would receive but there is nothing the Board
advisory opinion you could request your term of reenlistment be changed to
eligible for the full amount of SRB, however,
term. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
the panel will be furnished upon request.
5 years to be
you have indicated you do not desire a longer
The names and votes of the members of
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and tnaterial
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
Docket No: 204-02
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all
official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
ii1.j
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
ttstice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
YILL1110T011
TN
28055-0000
WAW
PERIOWWEL COMMAND
5720
INTEDRITY DRIVE
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL
RECORDS
Via :
PERS-OOZCB
Subj
:
BCNR PETITION
ICC
Ref:
(a)
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 05
Dee 01
Encl:
( 1 ) BCNR File Number 0126
In response to reference (a),
1.
petitioner's request.
recommend approval of the
The petitioner reenlisted on 05 February 2001 for three years
2.
based on a SRB message showing his entitlement would be in the
amount of
the correct amount for the number of years of reenlistment. He
was told by his servicing PSD that recoupment of
be taken out of his first installment payment.
It was later discovered that this was not
$27,403.31.
$9,865.20 would
In view of the above,
recommend the reenlistment contract
3.
dated 05 February 2001 for three years be expunged, and a five
years Zone A reenlistment be effected on 05 February 2001 for
SRB payment.
against his SRB calculation.
Further recommend that his extension not be counted
full
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the
Enclosure (1)
3.
Board for Correction of Naval Records
is returned.
(BCNR)
only.
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07191-02
The petitioner were issued orders on 20 February 2001 from the Enlisted Personnel Management Management Center New Orleans, LA to The return to active duty for disenrollment from petitioner reenlisted on 10 July 2001 for six years and received a zone "B" SRB entitlement for NEC 3354. the' NROTC Program. d. The petitioner request to receive all SRB installments and "C" School for the previous reenlistment prior to entering guaranteed the BOOST Program. However, the member is In view of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05178-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S MEH:ddj Docket No: 1 October 2002 5 178-02 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. The petitioner discharged paygrade was E-5. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03215-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. This was more than a month after you had reenlisted. 2. reenlistment date of 13 August 1999 to 04 October 1999 for four years.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08756-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner reenlisted on 02 January 2001 for four "C" SRB entitlement for the The petitioner received 47 months...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05110-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner requests to receive-the The petitioner ‘C" SRB reenlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08063-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) listed NAVHOSP GREAT The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05233-06
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. The petitioner’s SRB payment was based on 60-month reenlistment term minus obligated service between reenlistment and EAOS.5. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03259-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 mh MEH: Docket No: 9 July 2002 3259-02 Dear This is in reference to your application provisions of title 10 of the Ilnitctl States Code, section 1552. iOr correcticm 01‘ your naval record pursuant to the ot‘ the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive panel three-nlember- A session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with proceedings of this Board. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05127-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner was selected to the STA-21 officer program in October 2001. The petitioner requests to receive SRB offered in reference (b) based on the reenlistment of 19 July 2002.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06287-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend that a Zone B qualifying This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the 5.