Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07191-02
Original file (07191-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

MEH: ddj
Docket No: 7191-02
5 November 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 5 November 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 811 of 16 October 2002, a copy of which is
attached.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
ā€œCā€ school training via the STAR program.
the advisory opinion. You were not authorized  
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
However, you are entitled to the remaining
installments of SRB, reduced by the number of days spent in the BOOST program. You should
contact your disbursing officer and submit an arrears in pay to the Defense Finance and
Accounting Service (DFAS) to recover these payments.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The names and votes of the members

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.

Docket No. 7191-02

In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all
official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DcPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-000

0

116 0
Ser 
16 

811/

Ott 200 2

MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
via 
:

PERS-OOZCB

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:
Ref:

BCNR PETITION IC
SNM's DD For
(a) 
(b) NAVADMIN 
(c) MILPERSMAN 1160-100
(d) OPNAVINST 

1160.6A

308/95

Encl:

(1) BCNR File

In response to reference (a),

1 .
petitioner's request.

recommend partial approval of the

a.

The petitioner reenlisted for six years on 05 April 1996 via
the benefits of the STAR program.
The petitioner received a zone ā€˜A"
SRB entitlement for the Nuclear NEC 3354 at the time of reenlistment at
the award level of 4.5 offered in reference (b).
accordance with reference (c),
Officer Second Class.

Additionally, in
the petitioner was advanced to Petty

b. The petitioner signed a NAVPERS 

1070/621 extension agreement for

The petitioner reported to Newport,

four months on 23 June 1998 to accept BUPERS order 1218 to the BOOST
Program.
duty and enlisted in the NROTC Program.
installments were withheld because of the enrollment into the BOOST
Program.

RI discharged from active
The petitioner's remaining SRB

C .

The petitioner were issued orders on 20 February 2001 from the

Enlisted Personnel Management Management Center New Orleans, LA to
The
return to active duty for disenrollment from 
petitioner reenlisted on 10 July 2001 for six years and received a zone
"B" SRB entitlement for NEC 3354.

the' NROTC Program.

d.

The petitioner request to receive all SRB installments and

"C" School for the previous reenlistment prior to entering

guaranteed 
the BOOST Program.

e.

Per reference   (d), members who reenlisted/executed an

extension for SRB prior to applying for an officer procurement program
will have remaining installments
requiring formal academic training,
suspended as of their class start date.
Members who are dropped from
the program and return to enlisted status in the same bonus skill, will

Subj:

BCNR PETITION ICO

receive the remaining installments but at a rate reduced by the number
of days spent in the program.

f.

The petitioner was approved for the STAR program reenlistment

only for advancement purposes.
date of reenlistment that was listed on the Career Schools List(CSL).
Assignment to a 
STAR reenlistment, a Petty Officer Third Class who holds a valid Nuclear
Power NEC may be advanced to Second Class.

The petitioner held the NEC 3354 on the

"Cā€œ school was not given.

Per reference 

(c), at time of

e.

The petitioner is eligible to receive the remaining

installments of the zone "A" SRB entitlement.
not authorized 

"C" school training via the STAR program.

However, the member is

In view of the above, recommend the member receive the remaining

2.
reduced installments of the zone "A" SRB entitlement.
The entitlement
should be based from the date of discharge from the NROTC Program to his
original EAOS of  04 April 2002.

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board

3 .
for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

Enclosure (1) is returned.

MMC(SS) USN
Reenlistment Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03901-02

    Original file (03901-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. petitioner did not receive the zone reference (b) because he was selected for the NECP. The petitioner request SRB payment based on SRB eligibility effective the date of reenlistment and after his release from the NECP.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09430-02

    Original file (09430-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05127-03

    Original file (05127-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner was selected to the STA-21 officer program in October 2001. The petitioner requests to receive SRB offered in reference (b) based on the reenlistment of 19 July 2002.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06172-02

    Original file (06172-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 6172-02 13 November 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. petitioner's request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07921-98

    Original file (07921-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Reference (b) carried a zone "A" SRB entitlement for the RMSS rate at the time petitioner reenlisted.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01109-01

    Original file (01109-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner requests to receive his,automatic advancement to Petty Officer Second Class effective the reenlistment as part of the STAR program benefit.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07709-02

    Original file (07709-02.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY PERSONNEL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03457-01

    Original file (03457-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04573-01

    Original file (04573-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record This is an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05176-01

    Original file (05176-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 200 were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. reference (a), recommend...