Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05233-06
Original file (05233-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100



 DJC
 Doc. No. 5233-06
11 October 2006

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 October 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC MEMO 1160 SER 4811/505 dtd 16 August 2006, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,

         W. DEAN PFEIFFER
          Executive Director




Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
         NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
          - —      572OINTEGRITYDRIVE
          MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

1160
Ser 4811/505
16 Aug 2006
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAI~NAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
 Via:     PERS-3lC
Subj :

Ref:     (a) SUM’S DD Form 149 dtd 26 May 06
End:     (l~ BCNR File
1.       In response to reference (a) , recommend no change to the petitioner’s record.
2.       The petitioner signed a five—year reenlistment contract on 08 (October 2002. The petitioner received a zone “A” SRB with an award level of 4.5 for the FC(l334) rate/NEC. The petitioner’s EAOS at the time of reenlistment was 08 February 2003. The petitioner states that the SRB bonus payment was based on a four-year reenlistment term.
3.       The current MMPA data record indicates the petitioner received a total payment amount of $36,005.06 with an initial installment of $18,002.53. The petitioner’s SRB was based on 1,650 total days converted to 55 months zone “A” computation.
4.       The petitioner’s SRB payment was based on 60-month reenlistment term minus obligated service between reenlistment and EAOS.
5.       In view of the above recommend the petitioner’s SRB payment remain as is.
6.       This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only. Enclosure (1) is returned.
 ~        ;f~






ETC(SW/AW) USM
Reenlistment Incentives Branch

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09553-06

    Original file (09553-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/730 dtd 18 Dec 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04793-06

    Original file (04793-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests SRB eligible reenlistment effective 20 April 2006 and receive the zone “C” SRB offered in reference (b) The petitioner is ineligible for the zone “C” SRB entitlement. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00311-07

    Original file (00311-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    311-07 14 March 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.ncerely,W. This is an advisory...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06563-06

    Original file (06563-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 4811/561 dtd 21 Sep 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08740-06

    Original file (08740-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (b) did not provide an SRB award level for the ENrate at the time of the member’s reenlistment.3. Therefore the petitioner could not have been counseled concerning reference (c) prior to the reenlistment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05392-06

    Original file (05392-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Reference (c) provided a zone “A” SRB for NEC 8483 at the time the petitioner received orders to NEC 8483 training. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06397-06

    Original file (06397-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (d) provided a zone “A” SRB award level of 1.5 for the PR rate at the time of the member’s reenlistment. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05924-06

    Original file (05924-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/028 dated 18 Jan 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03695-06

    Original file (03695-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Reference (b) authorized petitioner to recall FTS in the PN rate via reenlistment. The petitioner requests to receive the FTS SRB payment based on the reenlistment of 26 July 2005.3.The petitioner is ineligible for the zone “A” FTS SHE entitlement because the member is on a first-term active Navy enlistment.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00658-04

    Original file (00658-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner passed through the zone “A” SRB window on 22 January 1998. The petitioner requests to backdate the 18 May 1998 reenlistment contract to 22 January 1998 and receive the zone “A” SRB offered in reference (b) .