DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVYANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH : ddj
Docket No: 5 1
26 August 2003
lo-03
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 26 August 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81
attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
l/378 of 3 1 July 2003, a copy of which is
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PF
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
MILLINGTON
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
TN 38055-0000
1160
811/378
Ser
31 Jul 2003
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
Via:
PERS-OOZCB
Subj:
BCNR PETITION ICO
Ref:
(a) SNM'S DD Form 149 dtd 04 Jun 03
(b) OPNAVINST
1160.6A
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
In response to reference (a),
1.
petitioner's request.
recommend no change to the
The petitioner reenlisted on 14 March 2003 for six years after
‘C" school training.
The petitioner received a
2.
completion of NEC 2780
zone
"C" SRB entitlement for the reenlistment.
The petitioner received nine months monetary SRB payment for the
3.
reenlistment of 14 March 2003.
full amount allowable for a zone
requests that SRB payment should be credited additional SRB payment for
the CONSUBPAY extension.
The petitioner requests to receive-the
The petitioner
‘C" SRB reenlistment.
The petitioner signed a NAVPERS
4.
14 April 2000 to continue receiving CONSUBPAY.
the time was 16 April 2001.
executed to meet CONSUBPAY may be deducted from SRB computation.
The petitioner's extension went operative on 17 April 2001.
the petitioner received the correct amount of SRB allowed for the zone
c
1,
1070/621 extension for 38 months on
The petitioner's EAOS at
(b), non-operative extension
Per reference
Therefore,
n SRB reenlistment.
In view of the above, recommend the petitioner's record remain as
5.
is.
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the
(BCNR) only.
Enclosure (1) is
6.
Board for correction of Naval Records
returned.
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05233-06
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. The petitioner’s SRB payment was based on 60-month reenlistment term minus obligated service between reenlistment and EAOS.5. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05675-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05848-03
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) listed a zone 'C" SRB entitlement for the MA rate at the time the petitioner received BUPERS order 2402. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03248-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/285 dtd 1 Jun 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06334-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to have the SRB payment readjusted to reflect the 4.0 award level for the Diver NEC 5342.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09974-02
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81 attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. However, per reference The petitioner was participating in the officer program at the time 5. of reenlistment, therefore the member is not eligible for the remaining zone "A" entitlement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01787-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Phis is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00658-04
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner passed through the zone “A” SRB window on 22 January 1998. The petitioner requests to backdate the 18 May 1998 reenlistment contract to 22 January 1998 and receive the zone “A” SRB offered in reference (b) .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10796-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/335 dtd 28 Apr 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03215-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. This was more than a month after you had reenlisted. 2. reenlistment date of 13 August 1999 to 04 October 1999 for four years.