Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06634-01
Original file (06634-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

,BOARD  FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP:ddj
Docket No:  6634-01
22 Janaury 2003

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003.
Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by COMNAVRESFOR memorandum 1133 Ser
copy of which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

 

N12/496 of 4 June 2002, a

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion.
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

Accardingly, your application   has been denied.   The names and votes of

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE  

NAVY

COMMANDER NAVAL RESERVE FORCE

4400 

DAUPHINE  STREET

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70146-5046

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Commander,
Board for Correction of Naval Records

Naval Reserve Force

ONS IN CASE OF

COMNAVRESCRUITCOMINST

(a) 
(b) Your memo 26 Mar 02

 

1133.1D

(1) Application for Correction of Military Record

(DD Form 149) of 4 Mar 01

1.

Recommending disapproval of enclosure (1).

Per reference (a),

a member must be working in a civilian

2 .
field comparable to the rating for which they are applying. At
the time of enlistment, Seaman
Service Specialist and a Customer
occupations do not meet the required skills similar to that of a
Yeoman Third Class Pettv Officer.

was working as a Family

Service Representative.

These



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00417-02

    Original file (00417-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    application, together with a applicable statutes, regulati opinion furnished by NPC attached. Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive tion on 22 Janaury 2003. Consequently, of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to le material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01078-02

    Original file (01078-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I application, together with all applicable statutes, regulation opinion furnished by NAVCI of which is attached. Your allegations of error and injustice vith administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the ~umentary material considered by the Board consisted of your material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory JITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/6118 of 11 June 2002, a copy After careful and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00959-02

    Original file (00959-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the member should provide...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04064-01

    Original file (04064-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D application, together with all applicable statutes, regulation: opinion furnished by NPC me which is attached. Consequently, naval record, the burden is on the applicant to material error or injustice. D.C. 20370-5000 OF THE NAVY L IN REPLY REFER TO 542 0 N13 22 Nov 2002 ODl / 02UO649 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: HE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR cas e file #04064-01 with microfiche service record The fo 1.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07022-02

    Original file (07022-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a), the following recommendation and comments are...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00370-02

    Original file (00370-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B;OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 370-02 22 Janaury 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive on 22 Janaury 2003. in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory 32/6040 of 8 April 2002, a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07238-02

    Original file (07238-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with al material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulatio opinion furnished attached. Consequently, naval record, the burden is on the applicant to robable material error or injustice. nlisted via the Accelerated Initial Accession the Advanced Pay Grade mporary e Army Reserve, vice Veteran e, however, e. she should have been accessed (OSVET) program or Prior Service her ASVAB...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01263-02

    Original file (01263-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    application, together with al applicable statutes, regul opinion furnished by NPC attached. accordan with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the ocumentary material considered by the Board consisted of your aterial submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory morandum 1780 PERS-604 23 May 2002, a copy of which is After careful and consci evidence submitted was tonne injustice. Notificatio was given the wides of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01712-02

    Original file (01712-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Eligibility for federal education benefit programs is determined by the member's initial entrance onto active duty other than for training. without enrollment in the MGIB Program, would have no education benefits.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00549-02

    Original file (00549-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the material considered by the Board consisted of your in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory N13D1/02U0377 29 July 2002, a copy of which emorandum 5420 However, the Chief of Naval Operations has College Kicker in your pay account. MEMORANDUM FOR T E EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj ASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1)...