Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00417-02
Original file (00417-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV

Y
3ARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

B(

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 4 17-02
22 Janaury 2003

This is in reference to your
provisions of title 10 of the

cation for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
ed States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of t
session, considered your
were reviewed in accord
proceedings of this Board.
application, together with a
applicable statutes, regulati
opinion furnished by NPC
attached.

Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive

tion on 22 Janaury 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice
th administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
entary material considered by the Board consisted of your
ial submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
d policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
randum 1780 Pers 604 of 28 March 2002, a copy of which is

After careful and conscien
evidence submitted was in
connec
injustice. In this  
the advisory opinion. A
the members of the panel

consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
ient to establish the existence of probable material error or
he Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
ngly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
be furnished upon request.

circu

It is regretted that the  
You are entitled to have th
evidence or other matter no
to keep in mind that a pres
correc
when applying for a  
demonstrate the 

existent

Enclosure

ces of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
ard reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
eviously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
tion of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to

le material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

EPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

178 0
PERS-604
28 Mar 02

MEMORANDUM FOR EXEC

TIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NA AL RECORDS

Via:

Subj:

Ref:

Assistant fo BCNR Matters  

(PERS-00ZCB)

t

TIONS ICO

(a) CNPC mem
(b) Veteran

5420 PERS-OOZCB of 20 Mar 02

Benefits and Health Care Improvement Act of
lit Law 
ELAND OH 2417002 Apr 01 (Military Pay

106-419)

1.

The following i

provided in response to reference (a):

DC 02211392 May 01 (NAVADMIN  

103/01)

Montgomery GI Bill
contribution of
benefit.
July
on or after 1
two weeks of entry.

up

Bill Program,

option.

effective 1 May 2001, certain members
cation benefit program is the
MGIB) Program can make an additional
o $600 and receive an increased monthly
ers must have initially entered active duty
985 and enrolled in the MGIB Program within
Members who enrolled in the MGIB Program by

ration, conversion from Veterans

conversion from Vietnam Era GI
ing the open period from
1989 are not eligible for this

an
cant
pr

b.

Reference 
individuals dischar
1 November 2000,
and make their  
included in this
the Department of V
members on active
attempt to apply th
are instructed to c
nearest Navy instal

(

d

) included a transitional provision for
ed between the date of enactment,
the effective date, 1 May 2001, to enroll
ibution by 31 July 2001.
vision could enroll and make payment through
terans Affairs (DVA).
ty after 1 May 2001.
ough DVA,
ntact the Education Service Office at the
ation for enrollment.

This did not apply to
If active duty members
their checks are returned and they

Only members

I

TIONS ICO

C .

Members on
option must sign a
statement regarding
their contribution

ctive  duty after 1 May 2001 electing this
D Form 2366 which contains a specific

References

c) and 

(d) provided information on

included guidance
and payment.

Additionally,

8 July 2001.
information on t
on active duty,
Detachment, Defe
for assistance.

of misinformation b

option or make his
8 July 2001.

who separated soon

o

eligibility and procedures for enrollment

Information was

left active duty on
e was searching for

benefit option while he was still
idn't  contact a Personnel Support
nd Accounting Service or PERS-604

record to correct
He did not complete a

ior to leaving active duty on
cannot receive the increased

re many veterans like

ay 2001 and didn't have much time

to

2.

PERS-604's poin

of contact is Ms.

Branch (PERS-604)

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01263-02

    Original file (01263-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    application, together with al applicable statutes, regul opinion furnished by NPC attached. accordan with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the ocumentary material considered by the Board consisted of your aterial submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory morandum 1780 PERS-604 23 May 2002, a copy of which is After careful and consci evidence submitted was tonne injustice. Notificatio was given the wides of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02354-01

    Original file (02354-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) provided the opportunity for active duty VEAP participants to enroll in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program provided they in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment). A review of MSC record indicates he did not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01712-02

    Original file (01712-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Eligibility for federal education benefit programs is determined by the member's initial entrance onto active duty other than for training. without enrollment in the MGIB Program, would have no education benefits.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03284-01

    Original file (03284-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) offered MGIB Program enrollment to active Per reference (d), duty members with money in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment). (c) or in VEAP.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04755-03

    Original file (04755-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2003. Reference (c) provided an opportunity for active duty VEAP participants to enroll in the Montgomery GI ill (MGIB) Program provided they were on active duty and had contributions in a VEAP account on 9 October 1996 (date of enactment). ~eview of his record revealed -was eligible for conversion under reference (c) because he did not a VEAP participant,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04703-03

    Original file (04703-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by PERS memorandum 1780 PERS-604 of 1 July 2003, a copy of which is attached. Only those members who were eligible to convert to the MGIB Program were notified of the opportunity. Records indicate letter was mailed transfer date from that UIC was 15 August 2001, which means the letter should have reached his command long before he detached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06603-02

    Original file (06603-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opening a VEAP account prior to the legislated deadlines, he is not eligible for VEAP benefits or conversion to the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06434-03

    Original file (06434-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Following enactment of reference (c), Navy attempted widest dissemination of the opportunity for eligible personnel to convert to the MGIB Program. Other notification was provided in ample time for members who didn't receive a letter to contact PERS-604 about their eligibility before the legislated deadline.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04326-01

    Original file (04326-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 4326-01 23 October 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. The following is provided in response to reference (a): Recommend the Board deny AT1 VEAP was available to members who entered the t_:L Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP). A review...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08842-98

    Original file (08842-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1780 SER of which is attached. Reference (c) provided the opportunity for VEAP participants to enroll in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program provided they were on active duty and had contributions in a VEAP Unfortunately, account on 9 October 1996...