DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JLP: ddj
Docket No: 7022-02
22 Janaury 2003
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Pers 913 of 22 October 2002, a copy of which
attached.
Your allegations of error and injustice
is
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
‘
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
PERSONFJZL COMMAND
38055-0000
NAVY
MILLINGTON TN
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
,
L
5420
PERS-913
22
Ott 02
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL
RECORDS
Via:
Subj:
Ref:
Assistant for BCNR Matters
(PERS-00ZCB)
REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION
AM3
IN THE CASE OF
USNR(TAR),
B
(a)
(b) Our
.BCNR Memo 5420 Pers-OOZCB
ltr 1306 PERS-913 of
of 8
Ott
24 Jan 02
02
(NOTAL)
Encl:
(1)
BCNR File 07022-02
1.
Per reference (a),
the following recommendation and comments
are forwarded concerning AM3
paygrade which was
previous
TAR program.
request to reinstate her
her enlistment into the
lb).
2002,,per reference
lb).
This
Petty Officer
was approved for a conversion from
USNR(TAR) in January
2.
USNR-R to
recall was contingent upon her agreement to accept an
administrative reduction to AM3 as specifically detailed in
reference
3.
request due to her agreement to accept
upon recall to the TAR program.
she may ask for an administrative
was not properly counseled,
discharge due to erroneous enlistment; however, her enlistment
documentation indicates that she accepted
we recommend disapproval of AM3
Regrettably,
a reduction in rank.
If AM3
ion
she
4.
DSN 882-4508 or commercial (901)
Point of contact for this matter is
874-
PNCS(SW/AW) Cheves at
Captain,
Director,
Administration Division
U.S. Naval Reserve
Naval Reserve Personnel
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08045-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 March 2001. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 undated, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05253-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 1 October 2002 5253-02 This is in reference to your application for- correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. oil 1 October 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory 57.30 Pers 9 13 of 22 August 2002, a copy of which is After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01576-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03211-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 862 of 11 June 2001, is attached your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory your a copy of which After...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07693-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by changing her commander date of rank to restore her relative seniority in her officer community. They recommend adjusting her date of rank to 1 June 1998. The petitioner promoted to commander at the month point in keeping with her running mates and within flow point guidelines of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00959-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 Janaury 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the member should provide...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06491-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2000. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend disapproval of - Petitioner reenlisted on 20 Sep 99 for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08353-01
They stated ” They further stated “By waiting until 1 October 2001, her Air Force promotion to Command (NPC) office having cognizance over Naval Reserve personnel administration, has commented to the effect that Petitioner the Naval Reserve Lieutenant Commander promotion list “From the documentation provided in [her application at enclosure (l)], it is apparent the member was given inappropriate counsel as to the timing of her appointment into the Naval Reserve. They find Petitioner ’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08560-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting i n executive session, considered your application on 13 June 2002. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, theburden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The projection for her next in zone eligibility for captain puts her at the 23 year mark, which is also one year above the notional flow point and in accordance with SECNAVINST...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06028-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.