DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
ARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
6
2 NAVY ANNEX
P
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JLP:ddj
Docket No: 4064-01
22 Janaury 2003
-,--_
~..
_
I.__
_
.-
al
This is in reference to your
provisions of title 10 of the U
A three-member panel of the
applj
session, considered your
were reviewed in accordance
proceedings of this Board. D
application, together with all
applicable statutes, regulation:
opinion furnished by NPC me
which is attached.
for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
States Code, section 1552.
for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
tion on 22 Janaury 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice
ith administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
umentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
orandum 5420
N130102U0649 22 November 2002, a copy of
consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
conscientiou
After careful and
I
:
cient to establish the existence of probable material error or
evidence submitted was
insuff
he Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
injustice. In this connection,
I’ngly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the advisory opinion. Accord
the members of the panel will
be furnished upon request.
i
It is regretted that the
circums
You are entitled to have the E
evidence or other matter not I
to keep in mind that a presum
when applying for a
correction
demonstrate the existence of
I
Enclosure
of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
tion of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
DEPARTMENT
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNE
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20370-5000
OF THE NAVY
L
IN REPLY REFER TO
542 0
N13
22 Nov 2002
ODl
/
02UO649
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
HE CASE OF SEAMAN
Encl:
(1) BCNR
cas e file
#04064-01 with microfiche service record
The fo
1.
Apprentice
rovides comment and recommendation on Seaman
i petition.
N130 recommend
denial of Seaman Apprentice
2 .
petition for an En istment Bonus (EB) of $5,000.
20
Seaman
3 .
20 May
(DEP) on
Submarine (MM-SS)
EB of $4,000.
reclassified to
for MM-SS.
favorable action
$5,000.
4. EB eligible
day a member
amount of EB a me
recla
entered the Delayed Entry Program
ered for the Machinist Mate
chool Guarantee and signed a contract for an
3 October 2000 at Recruit Training, he was
Machinist Mate (MM) after
Seaman Apprentice
isqualified
requests
at would allow an EB payment
in the amount of
and award levels are announced by OPNAV
In this case,
the message in effect the
during Recruit Training determines the
er is eligible to receive.
Although his
reflects a $5000 EB, in
1218252 JUL 00 (message in effect
an EB.
a member
Seaman Apprentice
enterin
the
MM program is not
is not eligible for
BCNR case file
5 .
herewith as
enclos re
(1).
Iwith microfiche service record is returned
”
I
Programs Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00549-02
Your allegations of error and injustice with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the material considered by the Board consisted of your in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory N13D1/02U0377 29 July 2002, a copy of which emorandum 5420 However, the Chief of Naval Operations has College Kicker in your pay account. MEMORANDUM FOR T E EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj ASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04584-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In accordance with BUPERS message 231454AUG99, (message in effect at the time Petty Officer Siienaiaie.. entered the DEP), the NF Program Was eligible for an EB of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04268-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Seaman 2001. and signed an EB contract in the to Recruit Training Command (RTC) requests.favorable action that Kicker in addition to the EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the 4. discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to enlist in critical skills. Correction of Naval Records, Docket No.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03281-01
D.C. 20350-2000 N S IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1’ 6 Aug 01 01LJ1200 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subi: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03281-01 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman 1. N130 recommends denial of Seaman Apprentice 2. for an Enlistment Bonus (EB). Challenge Program Guarantee petition, reclassification at RTC he was not offered an EB and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04314-01
his classifier could not establish whether Seaman Apprentice had ever received and EB and instructed him to petition the .an Other Service Veteran (OSVET), e Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 26 In his petition, he states that ection of Naval Records (BCNR) for an EB. Seaman Apprentice EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the The EB program is budgeted on quotas Navy Recruiting 4 . does not have an EB Contract in his At no other time may a member petition for an EB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00249-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07284-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N which is attached. An EB College Kicker is an EB and is governed Every recruit is not offered nor Navy Recruiting Command and the Seaman Apprentice Garcia has a valid EB Contract in the amount 5 .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07245-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FORCORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP : ddj Docket No: 26 November 2002 7245-02 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. h A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. In addition, the Board considered the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07147-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. N130 recommends denial of Seaman Apprentice 2. petition for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) College Ki of $3,000. He shipped to Recruit Training Command (RTC) on 1 e entered the Navy through the 29 March 2002, volunteered for the Seaman Apprentice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09973-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...