JLP: ddj
Docket No:
22 Janaury 2003
723802
This is in reference to your
provisions of title 10 of the
for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
nited States Code, section 1552.
the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
A three-member panel of
session, considered your ap
were reviewed in
with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board.
material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with al material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulatio
opinion furnished
attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
Ser N12 358 2 May 2002, a copy of which is
Your allegations of error and injustice
After careful and conscienti ‘us consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insu ficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection
the advisory opinion.
the members of the panel wi 1 be furnished upon request.
Actor ingly , your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
\
circu
It is regretted that the
You are entitled to have
evidence or other matter not
to keep in mind that a
when applying for a
demonstrate the existence of
Enclosure
of your case are such’that favorable action cannot be taken.
oard reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
reviously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
robable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
t-
KUI ’I
i
LUMNHUKtS~UK
NlF
DEPARTMENT OF THE
NAW
COMMANDER NAVAL RESERVE FORCE
4400
DAUPHlkE STREET
NEW ORLEANS,
LOUlSlPtlA
70146-5046
MAY. 2.2882
10:38RM P 1
PHONE NO.
: 5046786272
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Commander,
Board for C
aval Reserve Force
rrection of Naval Records
RECOMMENDALl
ON IN CASE OF
.,_
-.______
(a) COMNAVF
Enlist6
(b)
SCRUITCOMINST
Transfer Manual NAVPERS 15909
1133.1E
Encl:
(1) BCNR Fi
e 07238-01
Commander,
1.
request for
Specialist Second
from her
enlistmer-
Nau
advanc
1 Reserve Force does not support
ment and conversion of temporary Intelligence
lass.
records are noted:
The following pertinent information
SNB
c
(ASVAB) scores did
VE+AR=103.
reference
when 2 score
Her te
(b), tas
combi
FArmed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery
not meet the IS rate requirements of
t scores of VE 49 and AR 45 equaled 94.
scores
canonly be waived up to 6 points
ations are required.
b.
.'
(AIA) program, not
ineligible for a t
prior service in t
under the Other Se
In either ca
APG.
her from the IS ra
e
paygrade of E5.
nlisted via the Accelerated Initial Accession
the Advanced Pay Grade
mporary
e Army Reserve,
vice Veteran
e, however,
e.
she should have been accessed
(OSVET) program or Prior Service
her ASVAB scores would disqualify
(APG) program, and is
Because she had
has
2.
discharge due to t
retake the ASVAB t
she is qualified
test,
and score hi
in the Basic Reser
E
he following options; she can request
e erroneous enlistment; she can request to
st;
r.
h enough, she may then request to be enrolled
0 Intelligence Training
or she can strike
Should she choose to retake the ASVAB
fchr another rate that
(BRIT) Program.
-
_....
.._.._
.-
_.---_._
_.
Per
._-
OPTIONAL FORM 99
(7-90)
NSN
7640-01-917-7360
6099-101
GENERAL
SERME8
ADMNISJ-RATIDN
FROM : COMNWRESFOR
NIF
I
MFIY. 2.2002
PHONE NO.
: 5046786272
10:38F)M P
2
3.
con
PNC
please contact
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00991-02
As a result of this endorsement and Corporal request for a report date of 23 February 2001, CMC (RAM-2) published a set of orders on 17 January 2001 for Corporal Newsome ordering him to active duty (Enclosure (3)) effective 23 February 2001. Selected Marine Corps Reserve, accession to the AR program may disqualify you from this assignment. 36-month tour of active duty with the AR program to fill the following position: QUALITY ASSURANCE (6336) FORT WORTH TX 8820A...
By letter dated 8 June 1998, the applicant was advised that she was disenrolled from AWC based on an examination failure. Following an explanation of the scoring process, AWC/NS stated the applicant’s academic record (which they have provided) shows that on her Volume 3 examination scores, the applicant was given test number 66 and scored a 41 on the first exam. If a student fails an examination, the original failing score remains in the student’s academic record until the retest score is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001492
She would be rated on her performance of as many of the duties as were applicable. Overall, the contested NCOER was not in accordance with Army Regulation 623-3 (Evaluation Reporting System) so she is requesting it be removed from her OMPF. Although she provides evidence that indicates possible irregularities in the published rating scheme for her senior rater, there is no evidence and she has not provided conclusive evidence that shows she was not properly informed as to her rating chain...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00566-03
Applicant must meet the applicable education requirements for at c. least one of the ratings offered in the field in which they are enlisting. GTEP applicants are guaranteed assignment to an "A" school for a rating within the field they enlisted. 31-4 GENDET Homeport Guarantee Program g. The GENDET Homeport Guarantee Program provides individuals enlisting in either the two, three or four-year obligor GENDET program guaranteed assignment to one of six homeports upon successful completion of...
AF | DRB | CY2001 | FD01-00021
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMEtER FD-01-0002 1 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable. In view of the foregoing findings the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge; thus, the applicant's discharge should not be changed. (Atch 1.3); d. On 28 Aug 98, she used the e-mail and internet on a government computer in-an inappropriate h W e r .
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03370
If her composite score was close to 75 she would have known that she needed to do more to be sure of a passing score. DPSIM further states that after reviewing the applicants scores, her overall composite score received on 15 July 2012 is correct. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5 November 2012 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003044C070206
The applicant's record contains a DA Form 3286-59 (Statement For Enlistment United States Army Enlistment Program, U.S. Army Delayed Enlistment Program), Annex A, dated 16 July 2001, which shows the applicant enlisted for Army Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 09C1O (Trainee (English as a Second Language)). The applicant's record shows that in conjunction with his enlistment in the U.S. Army Reserve for the U.S. Army Training Enlistment Option on 16 July 2001, he enrolled in the MGIB. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09629-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that the record be corrected to show that she was advanced to petty officer second class (PN2; E-5), and by changing her reenlistment code.2. The Board believes that her six years of excellent service and the fact that she was unable to pass the PFA only because of her foot problem support her contention that a nonrecommendation for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009386C070206
LaVerne M. Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that he be allowed to retake the Armed Forces Qualifying Test (AFQT) so that he can qualify for an enlistment bonus and the loan repayment program. Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) does not authorize AFQT retesting for the sole purpose of qualifying an applicant for an enlistment incentive.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02561-98
The fact that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) granted you service connection for post traumatic stress disorder in 1997, effective from 23 August 1994, was not considered probative of error or injustice in your naval record. prior to your discharge were related to a personality disorder, which is a condition not covered by the military disability evaluation system, rather than a physical disability. It appears likely that the diagnosis made with all information would be PTSD and...