Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00370-02
Original file (00370-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
B;OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 370-02
22 Janaury 2003

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
on 22 Janaury 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice

accordant with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
material considered by the Board consisted of your

A three-member panel of th
session, considered your
were reviewed in  
proceedings of this Board.
application, together with al
applicable statutes,
opinion furnished by NAV RUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser  
of which is attached.

in support thereof, your naval record and

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

32/6040 of 8 April 2002, a copy

After careful and
evidence submitted was
injustice. In this connectio
the advisory opinion.
the members of

consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
to establish the existence of probable material error or

the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
your application has been denied. The names and votes of

be furnished upon request.

circu

stances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.

It is regretted that the  
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter no
previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correct on of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence o

probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

:

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPART

M ENT 

O F THE NAVY

NAVY RECRU

5722  I NTEGR

I T I NG COMMAND
I TY DR

.

M I LL I NGTON

,  TENNESSEE 38054

i-

I N REPLY REFER TO

:

- 5057

1133
Ser 
08 APR 02

32/ 6040

From:
To:

Commander, 
JP
Executive 
Di

1i

.vy Recruiting Command
ector, Board for Correction of Naval Records

Subj:

BCNR 

REQUES'I

ICO

Ref:

(a) COMNAVCF
(b) COMNAVCF

ITCOMINST 
'ITCOM 

1130.8F

ltr 1133 Ser 

334/N01121 of 07

Aug 00

Encl:

(1) BCNR 

Dot

:k

.et 

Nr. 00370-02

Recommend di
1.
, and enclosure
(b) 
through the  
Enliste
ref 
spy
paygrade held.

(b) and the  

This is an advi
2.
Correction of Naval

approval  of enclosure (1).
1) the 
Community Manager IAW policy set forth in
icant is not entitiled to any previous

paygrade  determination was made

Per reference

-sory memorandum for use by the Board for

Enclosure (1) is returned.

Records only.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01078-02

    Original file (01078-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I application, together with all applicable statutes, regulation opinion furnished by NAVCI of which is attached. Your allegations of error and injustice vith administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the ~umentary material considered by the Board consisted of your material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory JITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/6118 of 11 June 2002, a copy After careful and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07972-02

    Original file (07972-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND 5722 INTEGRITY DR. MILLINGTON. Time in rate is always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS returning in a lower paygrade.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 08229-03

    Original file (08229-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05690-02

    Original file (05690-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on 28 October 2003. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08644-02

    Original file (08644-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08767-02

    Original file (08767-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP : ddj Docket No: 8767-02 14 January 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06363-03

    Original file (06363-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NRC letter 1133 Ser attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06882-02

    Original file (06882-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32 copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08601-02

    Original file (08601-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. (N132) and SNM was Paygrade earned while in the Per enclosure (1) paygrade (b), This is an advisory memorandum for use by the Board for 2 .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00282-02

    Original file (00282-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NAVYCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.