Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01078-02
Original file (01078-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
I
COARD FOR  

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

CORRECTION OF   N AV AL 

RECORDS

JLP : ddj
Docket No: 1078-02
22 Janaury 2003

2 

NAVY 

ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

This is in reference to your 
provisions of title 10 of the 

z
1

plication for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
lited States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the
session, considered your app
were reviewed in accordance
proceedings of this Board. 
I
application, together with all
applicable statutes, 
regulation
opinion furnished by 
NAVCI
of which is attached.

3oard for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
:ation on 22 Janaury 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice
vith administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
~umentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
JITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 

32/6118 of 11 June 2002, a copy

After careful and conscientia
evidence submitted was 
insul
injustice. In this connection!
Actor
the advisory opinion. 
the members of the panel wi

; consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
cient to establish the existence of probable material error or
he Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
ngly , your application has been denied The names and votes of
be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the 
circun
You are entitled to have the
evidence or other matter not
to keep in mind that a presur
correctic
when applying for a 
demonstrate the existence of

antes of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
Bard reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
reviously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
Ition of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
robable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND

5722  INTEGRITY DR.

MILLINGTON, TENNESSEE 38054-5057

IN REPLY REFER TO:

1133
Ser 

32/bilb

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Commander, I
Executive D:

IVY Recruiting Command
rector, Board for Correction of Naval Records

BCNR 

REQUES':

ICO

COMNAVCI
(a) 
(b) PHONCON
AMs2m

JITCOMINST 
SUPERS CDR LEE 
C (N334) OF 13 JUN 01

1130.8F

(N132D16)/ COMNAVCRUITCOM

Encl:

(1) BCNR 

Dot

:et 

&Jr. 01078-0

2

disal

Recommend 

1.
(b) and enclosure
made through the  EI
in reference (a), 
:

jroval of enclosure (1).
_), the 
_isted Community Manager IAW policy set forth
JM is only entitled to E02.

paygrade determination was initially

Per reference

2.
Correction of 

This is an adv:
Nava:

;ory memorandum for use by the Board for
Records onlv.

Enclosure (1) is returned.



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00370-02

    Original file (00370-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B;OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:ddj Docket No: 370-02 22 Janaury 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive on 22 Janaury 2003. in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory 32/6040 of 8 April 2002, a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08644-02

    Original file (08644-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05690-02

    Original file (05690-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on 28 October 2003. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06323-03

    Original file (06323-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 32/06068 dated 20 October 2003, a copy of which is In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08767-02

    Original file (08767-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP : ddj Docket No: 8767-02 14 January 2003 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03626-03

    Original file (03626-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 32/06073 dated 20 October 2003, a copy of which is In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02648-03

    Original file (02648-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, Your allegations of error and injustice were considered your application on 28 October 2003. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07972-02

    Original file (07972-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND 5722 INTEGRITY DR. MILLINGTON. Time in rate is always assigned as the year of re-entry into the Navy for NAVETS returning in a lower paygrade.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 08229-03

    Original file (08229-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06363-03

    Original file (06363-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NRC letter 1133 Ser attached.