DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAW ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
LCC:ddj
Docket No: 7735-98
23 March 1999
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 23 March 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 4010 of 5 February 1999, a copy of
which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
DRIVE
5720 INTEGRITY
MILLINDTON TN
38055-0000
5420
PERS 4010
05 FEB 99
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Via: Assistant for Board
for Correction of Naval Records Matters (Pers-3CB)
Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR) INQUIRY ICO
Ref:
(a) BCNR Inquiry of 28 OCT 98 w/attachments ICO SNM
1. Reference (a) has been reviewed. The following comments and recommendations are
forwarded.
Striker designation of DK
Issue.
Background:
ADSD:
EAOS:
PRES
PRD/RCVD:
PREV
RCVD:
DUSTA:
DUSTA:
.
Member Data:
95DEC 11
98DEC10
RELEASED FROM ACTIVE DUTY
_-
NAS MERIDIAN UPT, MS
96MAR25
enlisted into the Navy under the Three Year Enlistment Program on
er initial training she was transferred to NAS Meridian, MS for duty.
2. Discussion:
10 December, 1
While at NAS Meridian, MS she was offered training at the DK A-school in a
status. This type of training is designed to give students training to help them with the
wide advancement examination. However, the student does not receive an
attend the school and does not receive any benefits other than the training.
participate in the Navy-wide advancement examination but was not advanced to DK3 or receive
striker designation due to quota limitations and her overall score.
“Courtesy Sit-in ”
Navy-
3. Recommendation:
non-receipt of an official quota for DK A-school and non-receipt of striker designation from the
Navy-wide advancement examination.
request for striker designation must be disapproved due to
4. My point of contact for this matter is
Rating Assignment Officer
A-School Assignments (PERS-401 OS)
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07410-98
This is in reference to your application provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. for correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02613-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 III II : M EH Docket No: 2613-02 9 July 2002 This is in reference to your application provisions of title IO of the Ilnitrtl States (:otle, section 1553. for correction 01‘ your naval record pursuant to the o!l 9 three-menlber panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive A session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance proceedings of this Board. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03013-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05908-01
Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,, In addition, the Board considered the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04544-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. GTEP IS A RECRUITMENT PROGRAM DESIGNED TO $2K ENLISTMENT BONUS TO BE PAID THE GTEP CANDIDATES WILL BE RECRUITED TO AN "A" SCHOOL FIELD INSTEAD EACH GTEP "A" SCHOOL FIELD IS COMPRISED OF 2. WHILE THIS MAY NOT ALWAYS BE THE CASE, EVERY...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04197-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. THE $2K ENLISTMENT BONUS TO BE PAID GTEP IS A RECRUITMENT PROGRAM DESIGNED TO GTEP CANDIDATES WILL BE RECRUITED TO AN "A" SCHOOL FIELD INSTEAD EACH GTEP "A" SCHOOL FIELD IS COMPRISED OF A GTEP 2. WITH COMMAND INVOLVEMENT VIA GTEP RECRUITS SHOULD RETURN TO WHILE THIS MAY NOT ALWAYS BE THE...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12258-08
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 May 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. They reason that although the command erred in allowing Petitioner to take the September 2007, Navy-wide advancement exam for I1T3, Petitioner was not eligible to take the exam per BUPERINST 1430.16F which states that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04444-07
Under that formulaSUBJ: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO most officers promoted approximately one year after graduation from law school, but there were frequent anomalies.The new implementing instruction, OPNAVINST 1120.11 signed on 29 December 2005, awards constructive service credit upon commencement of active duty at Naval Justice School. Additionally, the FY07 accession year group all have been treated similarly: they are all subject to the promotion guidelines of the new...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04792-07
Under that formulaSUBJ: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICOmost officers promoted approximately one year after graduation from law school, but there were frequent anomalies.The new implementing instruction, OPNAVINST 1120.11 signed on 29 December 2005, awards constructive service credit upon commencement of active duty at Naval Justice School. Additionally, the FY07 accession year group all have been treated similarly: they are all subject to the promotion guidelines of the new...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04793-07
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Additionally, the FY07 accession year group all have been treated similarly: they are all subject to the promotion guidelines of the new instruction.Although the officers rely on the argument that they began “processing” when the old instruction was in effect, what actually matters is what instruction was...