Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07410-98
Original file (07410-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Y

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON. D.C. 203704100

Docket No: 7410-98
9 March 1999

. _

.
This is in reference to your application
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

for correction of your naval record pursuant to the

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 9 March 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 PERS 4010 of 5 February 1999, a copy of
which is attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
INTEDRITY  DRIVE
MILLINDTON  TN 2805 5-0000

5720 

5420
PERS 4010
05 FEB 99

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via: Assistant for Board for Correction of Naval Records Matters (Pers-3CB)
su

CNR) INQUIRY ICO

Ref:

(a) BCNR Inquiry of 15 OCT 98 w/attachments ICO SNM

1. Reference (a) has been reviewed. The following comments and recommendations are
forwarded.

Issue. Change in initial contract obligation from 4Y0 to 2Y0.
Background;
ADSD:
EAOS:
SOFT EAOS:
PRES 
PRD/RCVD:
PREV 
RCVD:

Member Data:
970CT
030CT05
050CT05
STUDENT COMBATRCEN LNT
__
SSC GREAT LAKES, IL
97DEC12

DUSTA:

DUSTA:

Discussion: HM3 Swartz reenlisted into the Navy as a NAVET for four years with a 24 month
extension on 6 October, 1996 for entry into the Advanced Electronics Field (AEF). The enlisted
master file currently shows that  HM3 Swartz with a 6Y0 obligation which includes 24 month
extension.  HM3 Swartz desires to have his contract changed from a 4Y0 contract plus a 24
month extension to a 2Y0 contract plus a 48 month extension. Per
COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 
extension for entry into the AEF program.
3. Recommendation: Recommend member
Also recommend that the enlisted master file be corrected to show that HM3 Swartz reenlisted on
6 October, 1996 for four years with a 24 month extension.
4. My point of contact for this matter is P

1130.8e, navy veterans must enlist for four years with a 24 month

’s request to change his contract disapproved.

Rating Assignment Officer
A-School Assignments (PERS-40 1 OS)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02613-02

    Original file (02613-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 III II : M EH Docket No: 2613-02 9 July 2002 This is in reference to your application provisions of title IO of the Ilnitrtl States (:otle, section 1553. for correction 01‘ your naval record pursuant to the o!l 9 three-menlber panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive A session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance proceedings of this Board. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07735-98

    Original file (07735-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Recommendation: non-receipt of an official quota for DK A-school and non-receipt of striker designation from...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03013-99

    Original file (03013-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05908-01

    Original file (05908-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,, In addition, the Board considered the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01396-00

    Original file (01396-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D.C. 20350-200 NAV Y S 0 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 Ser 14 June 2000 N130D/ OuO329 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS via: Assistant for BCNR Matters (Pers-OOZCB) Ref: (a) DODINST 1304.22 Encl: (1) BCNR File #01396-00 with microfiche service record The following p.rovides comment and recommendation on former 1. Petty Officer initial enlistment into the Navy was ay she signed an agreement and 3. on 1 June 1987. statement of understanding that by electing...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06036-01

    Original file (06036-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments NPC Subject’s naval record n~emorand~~n~ 5420 Pers 4010 of 24 September 2001 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure corrected to modify a 24 month extension. il!justice on 30 October 2001 and, pursuant to its Zsalman, and Ms. Hare, reviewed 3. Member executed the 24 month extension for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06023-01

    Original file (06023-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 6023-01 30 October 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a 24 month extension. 0 Acting...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04197-01

    Original file (04197-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. THE $2K ENLISTMENT BONUS TO BE PAID GTEP IS A RECRUITMENT PROGRAM DESIGNED TO GTEP CANDIDATES WILL BE RECRUITED TO AN "A" SCHOOL FIELD INSTEAD EACH GTEP "A" SCHOOL FIELD IS COMPRISED OF A GTEP 2. WITH COMMAND INVOLVEMENT VIA GTEP RECRUITS SHOULD RETURN TO WHILE THIS MAY NOT ALWAYS BE THE...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04544-01

    Original file (04544-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. GTEP IS A RECRUITMENT PROGRAM DESIGNED TO $2K ENLISTMENT BONUS TO BE PAID THE GTEP CANDIDATES WILL BE RECRUITED TO AN "A" SCHOOL FIELD INSTEAD EACH GTEP "A" SCHOOL FIELD IS COMPRISED OF 2. WHILE THIS MAY NOT ALWAYS BE THE CASE, EVERY...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03215-02

    Original file (03215-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. This was more than a month after you had reenlisted. 2. reenlistment date of 13 August 1999 to 04 October 1999 for four years.