DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH: ddj
Docket No: 762 l-00
20 March 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 20 March 2001.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 Ser Pers 402 of 3 1 January 2001, a copy of
which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
Your allegations of error and injustice
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
5420
Ser Pers 402
31 JAN 01
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS (NPC-OOZCB)
From: Head Engineering/Hull Assignments Branch, PERS-402
To:
Via:
Executive Director, Board for Correction of Naval Records
(1) Assistant for BCNR Matters, NPC-OOZCB
Encl
(1) BCNR DOCKET NO.
7621-00 w/Microfiche Service Record
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
NPC records indicate that on 13 May 199
enlistment for a guaranteed non-specific class
enlistment contract.
was approved for Star re-
“C” school sometime during that
8 March 1996 SNM requested and was granted an OTEIP extension
On
USS Dubuque. It was the USS Dubuque
request from NPC. NPC never received a request for a school seat.
onboard the
’s responsibility to submit a TAD quota
Ott 1997 and requested to be released to special programs to
SNM reached his PRD
take orders to Physical Security which was granted. At that time SNM was sent to
Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio Texas where he attended Physical Security
Specialist
“C” school. SNM earned a 9545 NEC.
On 22 August 2000, SNM submitted and was approved for lateral conversion to the
Master At Arms rating
.
SNM Star enlistment was not violated. SNM attended a class
enlistment contract
Master At Arms is not a source rating for Machinist Mate schools.
. SNM cannot attend a Machinist Mate class
“C” school during his
“C“ school because
LCDR USNR
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07709-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVY PERSONNEL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04197-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. THE $2K ENLISTMENT BONUS TO BE PAID GTEP IS A RECRUITMENT PROGRAM DESIGNED TO GTEP CANDIDATES WILL BE RECRUITED TO AN "A" SCHOOL FIELD INSTEAD EACH GTEP "A" SCHOOL FIELD IS COMPRISED OF A GTEP 2. WITH COMMAND INVOLVEMENT VIA GTEP RECRUITS SHOULD RETURN TO WHILE THIS MAY NOT ALWAYS BE THE...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04544-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. GTEP IS A RECRUITMENT PROGRAM DESIGNED TO $2K ENLISTMENT BONUS TO BE PAID THE GTEP CANDIDATES WILL BE RECRUITED TO AN "A" SCHOOL FIELD INSTEAD EACH GTEP "A" SCHOOL FIELD IS COMPRISED OF 2. WHILE THIS MAY NOT ALWAYS BE THE CASE, EVERY...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02071-02
They further find the EM2 report for 10 October 2000 to 15 March 2001 should be removed as well, as Petitioner would not have been evaluated in this rate, but for the reduction. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing therefrom the following enlisted performance evaluation reports and related material: Period of Report Date of Report Reporting Senior From To 00Dec22 00Jan12 000ctO9 01Mar15 000ctlO 01Mar15 We recommend the report for the period 12 January 2000 to 9 October...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05908-01
Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,, In addition, the Board considered the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06172-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 6172-02 13 November 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. petitioner's request.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00193-99
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. - Petitioner requests the reenlistment contract of 20 Mar 1998 reflect a STAR reenlistment and the automatic advancement benefit under the STAR program for the AN/BQQ-SE Advanced Maintenance and Operations Training at NAVSUBSCOL, Groton, CT. (l), the STS rating had no schools on the CSL at - Per enclosure However, in reference (b)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08590-02
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (c), sailor may reenlist anytime within the same fiscal year The petitioner's EAOS is 17 May 2003, which is in the Per In view of the above, recommend the petitioner record remain as 2. is. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05210-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01349-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by NPC memorandum 1920, Ser 4834/031, 21 Jun 06 and NPC letter, 5420 POOJ6/1l3, 19 October 2006, a copy of each is attached. Members advanced under these procedures must be serving, in temporary officer status on the date enlisted advancement is effected.6. Accordingly,met both requirements in Aug 04, and his advancement to E—8 would have been effective 1 Jul 04.