DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
CRS
Docket No: 6836-00
8 August 2001
m
Your allegations of error and
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 24 July 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings -of this
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 5
On 4 November 1992 the commanding
December 1988 at age 17.
officer turned down your request for reenlistment due to
excessive page 11 entries for lack of motivation, judgment,
and fighting with junior Marines.
maturity, endurance, knowledge,
On 5 December 1992 you were honorably separated and transferred
At that
to the Marine Corps Reserve in the rank of LCPL (E-3).
time you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
honorably discharged from the Marine Corps Reserve on 15 December
1995.
An advisory opinion from the Promotion Branch, Headquarters
Marine Corps, a copy of which is attached, stated that you did
not have the minimum cutting score to be promoted to corporal.
The Board concluded that the numerous page 11 entries and
substandard performance were sufficient to support the assignment
It means that you may not reenlist
of an RE-4 reenlistment code.
in the Marine Corps without prior approval of the Commandant of
You were
I
the Marine Corps.
The Boar
opinion.
injustice in your,
Accordingly, your
votes of the membe
i
It is regretted th t
favorable action c nnot be taken.
Board reconsider i
evidence or other
In this regard, it
presumption of reg
Consequently,
record, the burden
existence of proba
The Board also concurred with the advisory
thus concluded that there is no error or
ank of LCPL or in the RE-4 reenlistment code.
pplication has been denied.
s of the panel will be furnished upon request.
the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
s decision upon submission of new and material
atter not previously considered by the Board.
is important to keep in mind that a
larity attaches to all official records.
is on the applicant to demonstrate the
le material error or injustice.
when applying for a correction of an official naval
The names and
i
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
2
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Ii ADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
I
3280 RUSSELL ROA
D
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA
22134-510 3
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1400/3
MMPR-2
5 Jun 2001
MEMORANDUM FOR THE E XECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIOIN OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
ADVISORY OPI ION IN THE CASE OF
ORMER MARINE
1. 'Mr.
he was promoted to
from active duty on 5 December 1992.
requ
sts his service record be corrected to show that
orporal 1 November 1992, prior to his release
:
Research of
2 .
composite score 0
1993 promotion
1992 in his
PM0
promotion to co
not have the re
service record indicates that he had a
or the November, December 1992 and January
The required cutting score for 1 November
Recommend that his request for
er 1992 be disapproved as he did
Acting Head, Enlisted Promotions
Promotion Branch
By direction of
the Commandant of the Marine Corps
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04718-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 July 2001. IN REPLY REFER TO: 1400/3 MMPR-2 13 Mar 01 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF FORMER - ‘ a retired Marine indicates that he completed his he grade of probationary corporal and should have been promoted to the grade of sergeant prior to his retirement from the Marine Corps on 22...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00991-02
As a result of this endorsement and Corporal request for a report date of 23 February 2001, CMC (RAM-2) published a set of orders on 17 January 2001 for Corporal Newsome ordering him to active duty (Enclosure (3)) effective 23 February 2001. Selected Marine Corps Reserve, accession to the AR program may disqualify you from this assignment. 36-month tour of active duty with the AR program to fill the following position: QUALITY ASSURANCE (6336) FORT WORTH TX 8820A...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10145-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Petitioner, a commissioned officer in the Marine Corps Reserve and former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting to remove administrative remarks (page 11) service record entries dated 7 October 2002, and promotion to sergeant on 1 November 2002. On J October 2002, he signed an adverse page 11 service record entry which stated that he was counseled regarding deficiencies in his performance and conduct and advised...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03939-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, considered your application on 14 May 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, on the applicant to when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is demonstrate the existence of probable material error or upon submission of new and material In this regard, it is important ili_justice. , a former...
USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501570
(“I [Applicant] further understand that I have been recommended for Administrative discharge due to failing the Marine Corps weight control program two times and being assigned for the third time.”) Applicant chooses not to make a statement.970312: Commanding Officer, Marine Air Control Squadron 2, notifies Applicant that he is assigned to the squadron Physical Training Platoon as a result of not being within Marine Corps height and weight standards. Weight: 237. Not due to pathological...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04807-01
1552 (1) (2) (3) (4) DD Form 149 w/attachments & Earnings Statement Leave Para 2, Marine Corps Promotion Manual CMC memorandum 1400/3 MMPR-2, 14 Aug 01 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), subject, 1. hereinafter, referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, paygrade record be corrected to show Petitioner was promoted to E-3 effective 1 March 1989 prior to receiving office hours and to be promoted to 1992. paygrade E-4 prior being discharged...
USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500755
The basis for discharge is the Applicant's failure to meet standards for weight control and body fat composition. Commanding Officer's comments: "Based on Lance Corporal C_'s (Applicant's) failure to meet the Marine Corps Standards for weight control and body fat, it is requested that he be separated from the Marine Corps with a general discharge." The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600430
There are no other record of use.9.) The summary of service clearly documents that misconduct due to drug abuse was the reason the Applicant was discharged. The Applicant admitted that he used illegal drugs and was properly notified by the Commanding Officer that he was recommending the Applicant’s discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04427-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 11 and 2 1 May 2001, copies of which are attached. 118(11) page 11 entry dated MC0 (IRAM), contains general P1070.12H, Marine Corps Paragraph 4007.6 and 4007.7 of The commander is afforded full discretion in the 2. request for correcting his assigned conduct and duty p marks are provided: CONIs.
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600400
MD06-00400 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20060112. I request to upgrade my discharge from a General under Honorable Conditions to an Honorable Discharge based on the justification of my post service conduct to the present date. Initially the Applicant requested to appear before an administrative separation board but on 19921118 the Applicant forwarded a Conditional Waiver of Administrative Discharge Board to the GCMCA, offering to waive his...