DEPARTMENT OF THE. NAVY
BOARD FOR
CORFECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 2482-01
6 June 2001
I!our allegations of
Documentary material
At
th;it time you were assigned a
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provision:; of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
e.rror and
application on 6 June 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance
ldith administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
considereld by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 17 May 1999 at
On 28 January 2000 the commanding officer recommended
age 25.
that you be separated based
your ASVAB test prior to enlistment.
received a general discharge
fraudulent enlistment.
reenlistment code of RE-4.
The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is required by
regulatory guidance and must
The Board thus
separated by reason of fraudulent enlistment.
concluded that there is no error or injustice in your
reenlistment code.
denied.
furnished upon request.
The Board did not consider whether your characterization of
service should be changed,
consideration and you have
on your paying of someone to take
On 4 February 2000 you
by reason of misconduct due to
since you did not ask for such
no-z exhausted your administrative
be assigned to individuals who are
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
According.Ly, your application has been
remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).
You may apply to NDRB by submitting the attached DD Form 293.
of your case are such that
It is regretted that the circumstances
You. are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07641-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00069-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3J reenlistment code when an individual in an entry level status tests positive for marijuana use, served less than 30 days in the DEP, confessed to the use of marijuana during the moment of truth, and was processed for separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09632-02
A three-member panel o$ the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2003. Although the documents concerning your separation processing are not contained in your records, it is clear that you were processed for separation by reason of fraudulent entry due to your failure to disclose pre-service medical treatment and diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 03953-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Accordingly, your application has been denied.The Board did not consider whether the reason for your separation should be changed because you did not request such action and have no exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07154-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2002. Given your concealment of your preservice arrest Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separation because of a fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03279-01
Concerning your abuse of alcohol you stated that It was also noted that you had previously been diagnosed The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 15 May 2000 at age 22. Based on the foregoing record, administrative separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment, a and alcohol abuse rehabilitation designated mental condition, Subsequently, the separation authority directed an failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07964-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 14 January 2000 An RE-4 reenlistment code is required by regulatory guidance and must be assigned to individuals who are separated by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03854-01
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. the discharge authority directed a general discharge by reason of He stated that the Navy had invested consider- fraudulent entry. determining what your true statement is, the governor of your state or the one you made while at the service school.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06763-00
were so separated on 21 July 2000. assigned an RE-3P reenlistment code. The Board noted that the evidence in your Marine Corps record was sufficient to refute the conclusion of your psychologist that you are qualified to serve in the military. the evidence-f your poor adjustment in recruit training and your admission to a fraudulent enlistment were sufficient to support separation from the Marine Corps.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04971-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...