DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TJR
Docket No: 6867-01
20 March 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session,
application on 12 March 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof,
and policies.
together with all material submitted in support
and applicable statutes, regulations,
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Your allegations of error and
your naval record,
considered your
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found you enlisted in the Navy on 29 April 1969 at the
age of 19 and served without disciplinary incident.
Your record reflects that on 25 June 1969 you were processed for
an administrative separation by reason of unsuitability due to
failure to adapt to military service.
Your record contains an administrative remarks (page
13)
dated 2 July 1969 in which acknowledged that you were not
recommended for reenlistment due to unsuitability.
noted, in part,
as follows:
entry
This entry
I understand that I am not recommended for reenlistment in
the U. S. Navy by my commanding officer.
understand that in accordance with current Bureau of Naval
Personnel policy, I am not eligible to apply for
two.(2) years from date of
reenlistment until a period of
discharge has elapsed and that I can then show that I have
increased my adaptability for military service.
I further
Not
recommended for reenlistment due to unsuitability.
Reenlistment may not be effected without prior approval of
the Chief of Naval Personnel.
and on 2 July 1969 you were
However, the Board concluded
Subsequently, the discharge authority directed an honorable
discharge by reason of unsuitability,
so discharged and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity and your contentions
that-you-were
discharged because of personality conflicts between you and your
training instructor, and that you would like to reenlist and
prove your suitability for service.
these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant a
change in your reenlistment code given your discharge by reason
The assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
of unsuitability.
was required when an individual was separated by reason of
unsuitability.
record, and you submitted none,
personality conflicts.
submitted no evidence to support your contention that you are now
suitable for military service.
your case, the Board concluded the assigned reenlistment code was
proper and no change is warranted.
Accordingly, your application
has been denied.
The Board noted that there is no evidence in the
Given all the circumstances of
to support your contention of
Further, the Board noted that you
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In th-is regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03794-01
comments concerning request mast, the CO stated that when he personally heard your request mast, concerning the charges or your dissatisfaction with the noncommissioned officer-in-charge or recruiting duty. you still had a strong Administrative 2 On 18 March 1980 the division psychiatrist reported to the Headquarters Company CO that you had been terminated from the psychiatry day care program on 11 March 1980 so that your performance and behavior could be observed in an infantry...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600252
The service member is unsuitable for continued military service on the basis of the above diagnosis of Personality Disorder. Recommends that Private First Class K_ (Applicant) be discharged for a personality order and that the characterization of service be General (Under Honorable Conditions).031014: Psychological Evaluation, 1 st Marine Division Psychiatrist, LCDR J_ R_, M.D., MC, USNR: 1. PLANS/RECOMMENDATION The service member is unsuitable for continued military service on the basis...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03511-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, thereof, your naval record, and policies. normally...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03093-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 11 September 1970, the separation authority approved the discharge recommendation and directed discharge by reason of unsuitability, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08343-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that you were properly discharged by reason of unsuitability due to a diagnosed personality disorder with an RE-4 reenlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02489-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. A review of his service record indicates that he was counseled concerning his inability to adapt to the military environment, and not being recommended for reenlistment due to suicidal ideations. COPY o f I was __ I...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06993-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00102
MD01-00102 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001024, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 000114 with Uncharacterized service due to Entry Level Performance and Conduct (A). The applicant states he received an Uncharacterized discharge due to personality disorder, then a DD-215 was issued, changing the...
AF | DRB | CY2004 | FD2004-00124
I I 1 1 I ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 I 3 4 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance withlwithout counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. The reason that I am...
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2006-183
discharge. I know it is in my, as well as the Coast Guard’s best interest to discharge me. With respect to the merits, the applicant stated the following: A review of the applicant’s record does not reveal any error or injustices with regards to processing of his discharge and assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.