DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 203704100
JLP: ddj
Docket No: 6812-98
30 March 1999
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 30 March 1999. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 7220 SER
copy of which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
P202C2/7U577213 of 27 May 1998, a
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20370-5000
IN REPLY REFER TO
722 0
Ser
MAY 27
1~
~202c2/ZtZI~3
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS
OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
Subj:
.'
Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB
REOUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ICO
Ref:
(a) SECNAVINST
1050.5C
Encl:
(1) BCNR Case File
Record
#08518-97 w/Microfiche Service
Per your request,
1.
enclosure (1) is provided.
the following recommendation concerning
The petitioner is requesting information on the 26 days
2 .
hold leave he earned at the beginning of FY 94.
section of the petitioner's Nov 94 Leave and Earning
Statement (LES), contained in enclosure
leave balance of 26 days as of 01
by 30 Sep 97.
leave prior to 30 Sep 97,
per reference (a).
Ott 94 which must be used
If the petitioner did not use the 26 days hold
then the leave is irrevocably lost
(l), shows a hold
The remarks
3 .
Pers-202 cannot recommend relief for the petitioner.
Head, Pay and Allowances
Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05622-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00833-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02615-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. retirement date not be never denied leave.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09699-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per references {a} through (c), recommend disapproval to the petitioner’s request.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 06334-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner requests to have the SRB payment readjusted to reflect the 4.0 award level for the Diver NEC 5342.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808650
- Petitioner requests to receive the Petty Officer Second eligibility back by reason of the STAR program. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08881-97
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 37, authority exists for U.S.C., Section 305a) and no...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03301-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S HD: hd Docket No: 03301-01 15 February 2002 Dear Command This is in reference to your application dated 20 April 2001 for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United States Code, section 1552, seeking removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 97 and 98 Lieutenant Commander Staff Selection Boards, and reinstatement to active duty as a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808786
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00981-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.