Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00137-99
Original file (00137-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
D E P A R T M E N T  O F  T H E  NAVY 
FOR C0RRECTK)U OF NAVAL REcoRoS 

2HAwAWmX 

WAGHINQTO(3 DC  201tOQlOo 

JLP: tj 
Docket No:  137-99 
10 August  1999 

USN 

Dear  SEAMAN APPRENTICE -: 

naval -rd 

pursuant to the 

This is in  reference to your application for correction of 

provisions of  title  10 of  the United States Code,  section  155 1 

A  three-member panel of the Board  for Correction of Naval  ecords,  sitting in  executive 
session, considered your application on  10 August  1999.  Your allegations of error and injustice 
were  reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative regulations  and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary  material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together with  all material submitted in  support thereof,  your naval record  and 
considered the advisory 
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.  In addition, 
opinion furnished by  BUPERS Memorandum  1133 Ser 
8 July  1999, a copy of 
which  is attached. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of  the 
evidence submitted was  insufficient to establish the 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your application has 
the members of  the panel  will  be furnished upon  request. 

the Board  found that the 
material error or 

contained in 

It is regretted that the circumstances of  your case are such 
You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider its decision u 

evidence or other matter not previously considered by  the k . In  this regard, it is important 

favorable action cannot be taken. 
submission of  new  and material 

to  keep in  mind  that a presumption of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when  applying for a correction of an official naval record,  the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN  PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

DEPARTMENT OF THE 

NAVY RECRUITING COMMAND 

8720 INTlGRlTY DR. 

MILLINGTON. TCNNCmSEL S.054- 

From:  Commander, Navy Recruiting Command  I 
To : 

Executive Director, Board for Correction of Naval 
Records 

Ref: 

( a )   COMNAVCRUITCOMINST 1130.8E  (CRUITMAN-ENL) 

Encl:  (1) BCNR  Docket Nr. 00137-99 

i 

1.  Recommend disapproval of enclosure  (1)  Original contract 
indicates SA -1s 
not en olled in the AEF/ATF 
program or in a rating that qualifies unde  the AEF/ATF program. 

2.  This is an adviso 
Correction of Naval Records on 

is returned. 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01669-99

    Original file (01669-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D C 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 N130Dl/ 141-99 03 AUG 99 NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06122-02

    Original file (06122-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03727-02

    Original file (03727-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Seaman Navy Recruiting Command and the ‘A" School does not have an EB contract in his service record and therefore is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01396-00

    Original file (01396-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    D.C. 20350-200 NAV Y S 0 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 Ser 14 June 2000 N130D/ OuO329 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS via: Assistant for BCNR Matters (Pers-OOZCB) Ref: (a) DODINST 1304.22 Encl: (1) BCNR File #01396-00 with microfiche service record The following p.rovides comment and recommendation on former 1. Petty Officer initial enlistment into the Navy was ay she signed an agreement and 3. on 1 June 1987. statement of understanding that by electing...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01420-03

    Original file (01420-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 Nl3 OD1 / 03110236 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS E CASE OF I Encl:...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04967-00

    Original file (04967-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03715-99

    Original file (03715-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00511-99

    Original file (00511-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Petitioner was an - Petitioner reenlisted for four years on 27 Feb 1998 under the STAR program and received a zone “A” SRB for this reenlistment. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07410-98

    Original file (07410-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This is in reference to your application provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. for correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00593-01

    Original file (00593-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N of which is attached. N130 recommends denial of Petty Officer 2. petition for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) . In his Id requests favorable action as disenrolled from he Electronics EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the Members who fail to complete basic including failure to graduate from and who do not continue in the skill for which The Navy offers an 4. discretion of recruiters and...