Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01669-99
Original file (01669-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
D E P A R T M E N T  O F  T H E  N A V Y  
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 

2 NAW ANNEX 

WASHINGTON DC  20370-5100 

JLP: tj 
Docket No:  1669-99 
24 August  1999 

This is in  reference to your application for correction of  your naval record pursuant to the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the United  States Code,  section  1552. 

A three-member panel of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive 
session, considered  your application on  24 August  1999.  Your allegations of  error and  injustice 
were reviewed in  accordance with  administrative regulations and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary material considered by  the Board  consisted of  your 
application, together with all material submitted in  support thereof,  your naval record and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition, the Board  considered the advisory 
opinion furnished by  BUPERS Memorandum  5420 Nl3OD 11 14 1-99 of  3 August  1999, a copy of 
which  is attached. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of  the entire record, the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was  insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained in 
the advisory opinion.  Accordingly, your application has been  denied.  The names and  votes of 
the members of  the panel  will be furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of  your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. 
You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider its decision upon  submission of  new  and  material 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by  the Board.  In  this regard,  it is important 
to keep in  mind  that a presumption of  regularity attaches to all official records.  Consequently, 
when applying for a correction of  an  official naval record, the burden  is on  the applicant to 
demonstrate the existence of  probable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

D E P A R T M E N T  OF  THE  N A V Y  

O F F I C E   O F   T H E   C H I E F   O F   N A V A L   O P E R A T I O N S  

W A S H I N G T O N .   D C   2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0  

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

I N   R E P L Y   R E F E R   T O  

5420 
N130Dl/ 141-99 
03 AUG 99 

NAVAL RECORDS 

- 

Subi:  COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN 

Encl:  (1) BCNR case file #01669-99 with microfiche service record 

1.  Following provides comments and recommendations on Seaman 

6 petition. 

2.  N130 recommends deny-etition 
Enlistment Bonus  (EB) for the AEF/CTM Program. 

-. 

- 

' 

for a 

ntered the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 23 

3 .  
July 1997, with the guarantees the AEF/CTM Program and EB of 
$4,000.  He shipped to active duty on 02 February 1998 and while 
at Recruit Training Command  (RTC) was disqualified from the 
AEF/CTM program due to having color deficient vision.  In his 
petition, Seaman Jungman requests payment of his EB. 

4.  EB is paid upon successful completion of the required course 
of  instruction and designation in the EB eligible skill for which 
the member enlisted.  Members who fail to complete basic 
qualifications for the EB, including failure to graduate from 
required school(s), and who do not continue in the skill for 
which enlisted, will have the EB option nullified.  Review of 
-microfiche 
he was not eligible for the AEF/CTM program due to color 
deficient vision and further that his guaranteed assignment could 
not be  filled for this reason.  His signed statement confirms he 
was properly counseled and accepted assignment to Personnelman 
(PN) class \\  A"  school.  Also, that he understood this agreement 
fulfilled the provision of his original enlistment contract. 
 heref fore-is not entitled to an EB. 

service record shows he acknowledged 

5.  BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned 
herewith as enclosure  (1) . 

-I--  h 

Assistant, Enlisted Bonus 

Programs Branch 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02898-99

    Original file (02898-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D C 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 ~130~1/132-99 19 JUL 99 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subi: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN USNR, Encl : BCNR File # 02898-99 with Microfiche Service Record 1. N130 recommends deny Seaman...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01420-03

    Original file (01420-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 Nl3 OD1 / 03110236 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS E CASE OF I Encl:...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08115-98

    Original file (08115-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. -is not entitled to both NCF and EB, and therefore is no longer eligible for EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06423-01

    Original file (06423-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 02110026 23 Jan 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl : (1) BCNR case file #06423-01 with microfiche service record 1. N130 recommends denial of Seaman Enlistment Bonus (EB) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01458-03

    Original file (01458-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 03210239 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 07664-98

    Original file (07664-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 August 1999. D C 2 0 3 5 0 - 2 0 0 0 I N R E P L Y R E F E R T O 5420 ~ 1 3 0D1/ 148-99 11 AUG 99 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF - NAVAL RECORDS Encl: (1) BCNR File # 07664-98 with Microfiche Service Record 1. N130 recommends deny receive an Enlistment Bonus (EB) .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06687-01

    Original file (06687-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2002. In his petition, Seaman-claims that an EB was erroneously left out of his contract and requests favorable action that would allow payment of an EB. Seaman s processing electronic archived record reveals no offered EB quota.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00762-03

    Original file (00762-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. N130 recommends disapproval of for an Enlistment Bonus (EB) Colleg 3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00320-03

    Original file (00320-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 2003. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 0 3 ~ 0 2 4 5 26 Mar 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN APPRENTICE . In his petition, Seaman Apprentice a requests favorable action that would allow payment of a $2,000 EB College Kicker.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00566-03

    Original file (00566-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant must meet the applicable education requirements for at c. least one of the ratings offered in the field in which they are enlisting. GTEP applicants are guaranteed assignment to an "A" school for a rating within the field they enlisted. 31-4 GENDET Homeport Guarantee Program g. The GENDET Homeport Guarantee Program provides individuals enlisting in either the two, three or four-year obligor GENDET program guaranteed assignment to one of six homeports upon successful completion of...