Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04967-00
Original file (04967-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Y

2 

NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20370-5100

LCC; ddj
Docket No: 4967-00
17 October 2000

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 17 October 2000. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER  
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

85/983 of 10 September 2000, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly,  your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN  
Executive Director

PFEIFFER

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAVY P

ERS O NNEL  COMMAN

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

D

143 0
Ser 
85/983
10 Sep 2000

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

RECORDS (BCNR)

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOXCB)

Subj:

COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE CASE OF

Ref:

(a) MILPERSMAN   1510-030

Encl:

(1) BCNR file  

#04868-00

Based on policy and guidelines established in reference (a),

1.
enclosure (1) is returned recommending disapproval.

enlisted in the Navy on a two year
ates, "Personnel may only request

2.
co
enrollment into AEF or ATF as an enlistment program or while at
recruit training command or naval  
of enlistment will b
Even though
years."
time of the school he did not have the required obligated service
to be eligible for advancement to ET3.

activities.
ligation of six
reenlisted at the

trainin

The term



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04199-00

    Original file (04199-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08158-00

    Original file (08158-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05145-02

    Original file (05145-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive 611 24 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. IAW reference (b) 6.16-2, service members who are 4. assigned to a designated deployable ship, operating away from homeport for 60...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03719-01

    Original file (03719-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. A requirement for advancement under the Accelerated As of when she was issued an advancement certificate, 2.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08112-01

    Original file (08112-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what IAW reference leave is charged when a member takes leave.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03062-01

    Original file (03062-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 3062-01 5 September 2001 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08388-00

    Original file (08388-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive Your allegations of error and session, considered your application on 2 1 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02687-01

    Original file (02687-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what IAW reference leave is charged when a member takes leave.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02021-01

    Original file (02021-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00071-01

    Original file (00071-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1430 SER which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.