Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999027360
Original file (1999027360.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
PART II - APPLICATION DATA

(Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy)

1. Character of Discharge: GD

2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 930803

3. Authority for separation:

         a. Regulation: Chapter 9, AR 635-200

          b. Reason: Alcohol Abuse-Rehabilitation Failure
4. Prior review(s): NONE


PART III - SERVICE HISTORY

SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review

 1.       Service data: 2. Awards and decorations:
                            NDSM
a. Period entered for: 5 Years ASR
b. Entry date: 920131
c. Age: 22 Years DOB: 690309
d. Educational level: HS Grad
e. Aptitude area score:
          GT: 101 3. Highest grade achieved:
f. Length of Service: E3
1 Year(s) 6 Month(s) 3 Day(s)

4. Performance evaluations:
NONE

PART III - SERVICE HISTORY
SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued

5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE

 Status Inclusive dates
         AWOL

         Mil conf

         Civil conf

         Other


6. Nonjudicial punishment:

         Date     Offense(s)
         930331 Operating a vehicle, while drunk (930306)

7. Court-Martial data: NONE
         a. SCM:
                  Date Offense(s)

        
         b. SPCM:
                  Date Offense(s)

         c. GCM: 
                  Date Offense(s)


8.       Remarks: NONE
SECTION B - Prior Service Data
NONE

Other discharge(s):

          Service   From      To        Type Discharge





PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW

SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT
l. Facts and Circumstances:

          a. The evidence of record shows that on 28 April 1993, the unit commander in consultation with the Clinical Director/ADAPCP declared the applicant rehabilitation failure. On 15 July 1993, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, for rehabilitation failure, with an honorable discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement on his behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended approval of the discharge action and forwarded it through command channels to the separation authority. On 16 July 1993, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a general discharge.

         b. On 3 August 1993, the applicant was discharged with a general, under honorable conditions discharge, under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol abuse-rehabilitation failure. He was credited with 1 year,
6 months, and 3 days active service on the enlistment under review.

2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action : Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 9 contains the authority and outlines the procedures for discharging individuals because of alcohol or other drug abuse. A member who has been referred to the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) for alcohol/drug abuse may be separated because of inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program if there is a lack of potential for continued Army service and rehabilitation efforts are no longer practical. Army policy states that an honorable or general discharge is authorized depending on the applicant’s overall record of service. (However, an honorable discharge is required if restricted use information is used in the discharge process).

SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS


 1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel.
As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293.
2. Exhibit(s) submitted:

         A-1: DD Form 293, dated 990525, with one (1) enclosure(s).
         A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE
         B-l: Other Documents: NONE
         C-1: DD Form 149, dated 990608.

PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED)



SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion


Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor



 a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable):

b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable):
PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING

SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits

1. Review/hearing information:

         a. Type requested:
         ( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing
         b. Type Held:
         ( X )Records review ( ) Hearing
         ( ) Tender Offer

         c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 28 July 1999

         d. Appearance by:
         Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No
         Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No

          e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
         f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
         g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No
        
2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing:

PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS

1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity:

          ( X )   Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive.
         ( )     Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows:
         ( )     Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows:
         b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason


2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity:

          a. Propriety:    The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge.

          b. Equity:       The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above:

 (1) The issue is rejected. The Board carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review. The record does not support the applicant’s contention, and no evidence to support it has been submitted by the applicant, that his discharge was the result of marital problems. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged based on his receiving nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for driving while intoxicated (DWI); his refusing to voluntarily enroll in the Alcohol Drug Abuse and Prevention Control Program (ADAPCP); and his refusing to participate in ADAPCP when he was command referred. The Board determined that the applicant was offered many legitimate avenues through which to obtain assistance or relief, and that he declined all of them. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.


 3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE
PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote

1.       Board conclusion(s):

         The discharge was:

          ( X )    Proper.
         ( )      Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to                                      .
         ( )      Improper as to reason. Change reason to                         under                       .

         ( X )    Equitable.
         ( )      Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to                                .
         ( )      Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to                       
                  under                                  .
         ( )      Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                      under                          .
2. Voting record: Change No Change
         Reason 0 5
Characterization 0 5

         The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document.

Department of the Army Review Boards Agency
ATTN: Promulgation Team
1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor
Arlington, VA 22202-4508



3. Minority views: NONE

PART VII - BOARD ACTION
SECTION B - Verification and Authentication

Case report reviewed and verified       

                                 
MRS. WADE
Case Reviewing Official 

PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION
SECTION A - DIRECTIVE
NONE
SECTION B - CERTIFICATION

Approval Authority:


THOMAS J. ALLEN
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge
Review Board

Official:




SUZANNE WALKER
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder

EXHIBITS:
A - Application for review of discharge          C - Other
B - Material submitted by applicant

INDEX RECORD:

 AR Number: 1999027360 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217
Date of Review: 990728 A0100
Character of Service: GD A9307
Date of Discharge: 930803
Authority: AR 635-200 C9
Reason: A6900
Results of Board Action/
Vote/Affirmation: NC 5-0 A













PART IX - VOTING RECORD



 Name  Reason Characterization
 CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR

1.      Mbr      X          X    

2.      Mbr      X          X    

3.      Mbr      X          X    

4.      Mbr      X          X    

5.      PO      X          X    





Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999025632

    Original file (1999025632.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED) ( X ) Change the characterization of the discharge to Honorable.SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board AR Number: 1999025632 INDEX NUMBERS: A0130 Date of Review: 990602 A9218 Character of Service: GD A9500 Date of Discharge: 930624 Authority: AR 635-200 C9 Reason: A6900 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: HD 5-0...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2000 | 2000043150

    Original file (2000043150.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. AR Number: 2000043150 INDEX NUMBERS: A6901 Date of Review: 000802 A0100 Character of Service: HD A9307 Date of Discharge: 930901 A9445 Authority: AR 635-200 C9 A9217 Reason: A6900 Results of Board...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999024915

    Original file (1999024915.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army policy states that an honorable or general discharge is authorized depending on the applicant’s overall record of service. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 1999024915 INDEX NUMBERS: A9217 Date of Review: 990428 A9221 Character of Service: GD A9445 Date of Discharge: 930224 A0100 Authority: AR 635-200 C9 Reason: A6900 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: HD 5-0 A PART IX - VOTING RECORDName Reason...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999023253

    Original file (1999023253.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant AR Number: 1999023253 INDEX NUMBERS: A9402 Date of Review: 990331 A9201 Character of Service: GD A9217 Date of Discharge: 930803 A9301 Authority: AR 635-200 C14 A9317 Reason: A6730 A0100 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: MD 5-0 A PART IX - VOTING RECORDName Reason Characterization CHANGENCHONUHCNCUNCHAR 1.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2001 | 2001053790

    Original file (2001053790.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE C-1: DD Form 149, dated 010103. The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2003 | 2003084439

    Original file (2003084439.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 17 June 1993, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure, with a honorable discharge. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 23 May 2003 The Army Discharge Review...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999025597

    Original file (1999025597.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board AR Number: 1999025597...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999024784

    Original file (1999024784.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 May 1994, the applicant was discharged with an honorable discharge, under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board AR...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1998 | 1998012841

    Original file (1998012841.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief.3. PART VII - BOARD ACTIONSECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified MR. ADRIANCE Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATIONSECTION A - DIRECTIVE NONE SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board AR Number: 98012841 INDEX...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY1999 | 1999025628

    Original file (1999025628.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army policy states that an honorable or general discharge is authorized depending on the applicant’s overall record of service. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. ( X ) Change the characterization of the discharge to Honorable.SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority:THOMAS J. ALLEN Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board