Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008006
Original file (20100008006.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  13 May 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100008006 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests removal from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) the duplicate set of orders awarding her the third award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL).

2.  The applicant states there should only be one set of GCMDL orders for each 3-year period.  However, her OMPF has two separate GCMDL orders for the same time period.  She believes the Personnel Services Battalion (PSB) simply made an administrative error and issued two orders.

3.  The applicant provides copies of an email message and two GCMDL orders. The email message is from an OMPF records official in response to her inquiry.  The message provides instructions to the applicant to have her S-1 or PSB revoke the duplicate order.  It also advises her that the duplicate and revocation orders will both be filed in her OMPF, unless she applies to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to have them removed and her request is approved.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted and entered active duty in the Regular Army on 9 July 1998.  She has served continuously on active duty to the present.

2.  A review of the applicant's records shows the following GCMDL orders are filed in the performance portion of her OMPF:
	a.  Headquarters, 556th PSB, Permanent Orders 199-319, dated 18 July 2001, that awarded her the GCMDL (1st Award) for the period of service from
9 July 1998 to 8 July 2001.

   b.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, Permanent Orders 145-0011, dated 24 May 2004, that awarded her the GCMDL
(2nd Award) for the period of service from 9 July 2001 to 8 July 2004.

   c.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, Permanent Orders 173-10, dated 22 June 2007, that awarded her the GCMDL (3rd Award) for the period of service from 9 July 2004 to 8 July 2007.

   d.  Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, Permanent Orders 211-04, dated 30 July 2007, that awarded her the GCMDL (3rd Award) for the period of service from 9 July 2004 to 8 July 2007.

3.  There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's OMPF to show that either of the orders awarding her the GCMDL (3rd Award) were revoked.

4.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning military awards and decorations.

   a.  The Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years, except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.

   b.  Paragraph 1-19 (Duplication of awards) provides that only one decoration will be awarded to an individual or unit for the same act, achievement, or period of meritorious service.

   c.  Paragraph 1-28 (Announcement of revocation of awards) provides that revocation of an award will be announced in permanent orders and Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO), when the award is published in a DAGO.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/
Records) provides policies, operating tasks, and steps governing the OMPF. Depending on the purpose, documents will be filed in the OMPF in one of three sections:  performance, service, or restricted.  Once placed in the OMPF, the document becomes a permanent part of that file.  Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) shows that award orders are filed in the performance portion of the OMPF.  Orders revoking award orders are also filed in the performance portion of the OMPF.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that the duplicate set of orders awarding her the Good Conduct Medal (3rd Award) that are filed in her OMPF should be removed.

2.  Two separate permanent orders awarded the applicant the third award of the GCMDL for the same period of service.

3.  The Military Awards regulation states that only one decoration will be awarded to an individual for the same period of meritorious service.  It also shows that revocation of an award will be announced in permanent orders.

4.  It is clear that an administrative error was made when the second permanent order was issued awarding the applicant a duplicate award of the GCMDL
(3rd Award).  There is no evidence that either of the permanent orders in question have been revoked.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to revoke the second (duplicate) order that was issued awarding the applicant the GCMDL
(3rd Award) for the same period of service.

5.  In order to fully correct the applicant's records, it would be appropriate to remove the duplicate award order from her OMPF.  In addition, the order revoking the duplicate order should not be filed in her OMPF.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  revoking Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, Permanent Orders 211-04, dated 30 July 2007; and

   b.  removing Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Fort George G. Meade, Maryland, Permanent Orders 211-04, dated 30 July 2007, and the related revocation order from her OMPF.



      _______ _  X _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008006



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008006



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010726C071029

    Original file (20060010726C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Permanent Orders 295-20, which awarded her the Good Conduct Medal, and which were rescinded, be removed from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant's request for removal of Permanent Orders 109-18 and Permanent Orders 295-20, which awarded her the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award and 3rd Award), for an incorrect period of good conduct, from her OMPF, has merit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007611

    Original file (20080007611.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He goes on to state that one order for the 3rd award and one order for the 6th award of the GCMDL should be removed from his OMPF and revoked. The applicant provides a personnel records request form and copies of all orders awarding him the GCMDL. Accordingly, action should be taken to revoke Permanent Orders 101-689 dated 11 April 2001 (3rd Award) and Permanent Orders 085-03 dated 31 March 2008 (6th Award), which are both duplicate orders contained in his OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001909

    Original file (20110001909.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) the duplicate set of orders awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's OMPF to show that either of the orders awarding him the GCMDL (1st Award) were revoked. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. filing in his OMPF Permanent Orders 026-01, 1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016604

    Original file (20080016604.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he was awarded his third Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) by Headquarters, US Army Garrison, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland, Permanent Orders 138-2, dated 18 May 2005. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing Permanent Orders 139-8, Headquarters, US Army Garrison, Aberdeen Proving Ground,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000030

    Original file (20150000030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His OMPF contains the following orders that awarded him the AGCM, listed chronologically by order date: * Headquarters, NTC and Fort Irwin Permanent Orders 90-46, dated 26 August 1993 (AGCM 1st Award, for the period 11 July 1990 to 10 July 1993) * Headquarters, NTC and Fort Irwin Permanent Orders 31-60, dated 4 April 1994 (AGCM 1st Award, for the period 11 July 1990 to 10 July 1993) * Detachment A, 90th Personnel Service Battalion (PSB) Permanent Orders 131-12, dated 4 November 1996 (AGCM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060003520C070205

    Original file (AR20060003520C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Rowland Heflin | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, the removal of permanent orders 357- 25 dated 23 December 1997 and permanent orders number 205-4 dated 24 July 1998 from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant states that the two cited orders are duplicate orders of awards of the second and third awards of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and they should be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008304

    Original file (20080008304.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Permanent Orders Number 84-01 and 84-03 dated 25 March 1999, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the 2nd and 3rd award be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). This regulation also provides that once filed such documents become a permanent part of the OMPF and may only be removed by one of several agencies, one of which is the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). It is evident that the orders which the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021439

    Original file (20090021439.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, the subject orders awarding her the Army Good Conduct Medal - first and second awards - are incorrect as to the dates or period of service, and she has correct orders in her records for these awards. A Detachment, 516th Personnel Services Battalion, Permanent Orders 26-226, awarded the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 27 May 1998 to 26 May 2001. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020926

    Original file (20100020926.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of the erroneous award order, the revocation order, and the correct order awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (3rd Award). Corrected orders were issued for the applicant's 3rd award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * removing from his OMPF Permanent Orders Number 292-1, dated 8 November 2004, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (3rd...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017021C070205

    Original file (20060017021C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Scott Faught | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that his OMPF contains two orders awarding him the GCMDL that were subsequently revoked because they were duplicates of orders already placed in his OMPF; however, the award orders and the revocation are in his OMPF and he desires that they be removed because he is preparing his records for review by the promotion selection board....