Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021439
Original file (20090021439.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  25 February 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090021439 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, removal of Permanent Orders 26-226, dated 26 January 2002, and Permanent Orders 163-01, dated 12 June 2006, from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the subject orders awarding her the Army Good Conduct Medal - first and second awards - are incorrect as to the dates or period of service, and she has correct orders in her records for these awards.

3.  The applicant provides A Detachment, 516th Personnel Services Battalion Permanent Orders 26-226, dated 26 January 2002; and Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Brigade, 3rd Infantry Division, Fort Stewart, GA, Permanent Orders 163-01, dated 12 June 2006, in support of her request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s records show she enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on
26 May 1998 and she continues to serve on active duty.

2.  The applicant’s OMPF contains the following sequential orders awarding her the Army Good Conduct Medal:

	a.  Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), Fort Campbell, KY, Permanent Orders 131-00058, dated 11 May 2001, awarding her the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 26 May 1998 through 25 May 2001;

	b.  Headquarters, 3rd Soldier Support Battalion (Provisional), Camp Liberty, Kuwait, Permanent Orders 262-05, dated 13 April 2005, awarding her the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for the period 26 May 2001 through 25 May 2004; and

	c.  Headquarters, Task Force 2-7, 1st Heavy Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division, Fort Stewart, Permanent Orders 323-01, dated 19 November 2009, awarding her the Army Good Conduct Medal (3rd Award) for the period
26 May 2004 through 25 May 2007.

3.  A Detachment, 516th Personnel Services Battalion, Permanent Orders 
26-226, awarded the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 27 May 1998 to 26 May 2001.  These orders cite an incorrect period of service and duplicates correct orders shown in paragraph 2a, above.

4.  Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Brigade, 3rd Infantry Division, Fort Stewart, Permanent Orders 163-01, awarded the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) for the period 25 May 2003 through 26 May 2006.  These orders cite an incorrect period of service and duplicates correct orders shown in paragraph 2b, above.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The subject orders are incorrect as to dates and/or periods of service, and duplicate correct orders previously published.  Therefore, these incorrect orders should be removed from the applicant's OMPF.









BOARD VOTE:

____X___  _____X__  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  revoking A Detachment, 516th Personnel Services Battalion, Permanent Orders 26-226, dated 26 January 2002; and Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Brigade, 3rd Infantry Division, Fort Stewart, Permanent Orders 163-01, dated 12 June 2006;

   b.  removing the two revoked orders from her OMPF; and

	c.  not filing the revocation orders in her OMPF.



      ___________X___________
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021439



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090021439



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023180

    Original file (20100023180.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states PO 26-886, dated 26 January 2001, is the appropriate order for the AGCM (2nd Award) that covers the period 2 October 1997 to 1 October 2000. A review of his record shows the following awards are filed in the performance section of his OMPF: a. AGCM (1st Award) for the period 6 October 1994 to 5 October 1997 per PO 029-00014 issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Signal Center and Fort Gordon, on 29 January 1998; b. AGCM (2nd Award) for the period 2 October 1997 to 1 October 2000 per PO...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009232C070206

    Original file (20050009232C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: a. The applicant’s request to have a memorandum, dated 19 November 1996 pertaining to denial of award to the AGCM removed from his records was carefully considered. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing Department of the Army, 2nd Battalion, 14th Infantry, Fort Drum, New York, memorandum dated 19 November 1996 and titled Denial of Good Conduct Medal, be removed from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028983

    Original file (20100028983.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of duplicate orders awarding her the Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) from her official military personnel file (OMPF). The evidence of record shows the applicant was issued two orders awarding her the second award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the same period of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. revoking Permanent Orders 103-09, issued by Charlie...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007611

    Original file (20080007611.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He goes on to state that one order for the 3rd award and one order for the 6th award of the GCMDL should be removed from his OMPF and revoked. The applicant provides a personnel records request form and copies of all orders awarding him the GCMDL. Accordingly, action should be taken to revoke Permanent Orders 101-689 dated 11 April 2001 (3rd Award) and Permanent Orders 085-03 dated 31 March 2008 (6th Award), which are both duplicate orders contained in his OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008208

    Original file (20090008208.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 July 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090008208 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests removal of a duplicate document, with no permanent order number, dated 26 March 2009, for award of the Good Conduct Medal (6th Award), from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The evidence of record shows that the applicant's OMPF contains two documents, one with a permanent orders number and the other without, awarding her the Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010726C071029

    Original file (20060010726C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Permanent Orders 295-20, which awarded her the Good Conduct Medal, and which were rescinded, be removed from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant's request for removal of Permanent Orders 109-18 and Permanent Orders 295-20, which awarded her the Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award and 3rd Award), for an incorrect period of good conduct, from her OMPF, has merit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000030

    Original file (20150000030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His OMPF contains the following orders that awarded him the AGCM, listed chronologically by order date: * Headquarters, NTC and Fort Irwin Permanent Orders 90-46, dated 26 August 1993 (AGCM 1st Award, for the period 11 July 1990 to 10 July 1993) * Headquarters, NTC and Fort Irwin Permanent Orders 31-60, dated 4 April 1994 (AGCM 1st Award, for the period 11 July 1990 to 10 July 1993) * Detachment A, 90th Personnel Service Battalion (PSB) Permanent Orders 131-12, dated 4 November 1996 (AGCM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008304

    Original file (20080008304.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Permanent Orders Number 84-01 and 84-03 dated 25 March 1999, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the 2nd and 3rd award be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). This regulation also provides that once filed such documents become a permanent part of the OMPF and may only be removed by one of several agencies, one of which is the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). It is evident that the orders which the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001909

    Original file (20110001909.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) the duplicate set of orders awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL). There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's OMPF to show that either of the orders awarding him the GCMDL (1st Award) were revoked. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. filing in his OMPF Permanent Orders 026-01, 1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050008277C070206

    Original file (20050008277C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his OMPF has 5 different orders for his AGCM (4th Award) and he requests that 4 of the awards be removed from his OMPF. These orders awarded the applicant the AGCM (4th Award) for the period 29 January 1997 to 28 January 2000. Orders awarding the applicant the AGCM (1st through 3rd Award) are correct for those time periods in which the applicant served.