Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014187
Original file (20090014187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 January 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090014187 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that multiple transcripts from a college be removed from her official military personnel file (OMPF).

2.  The applicant states that she has been trying to update her records prior to promotion board consideration by having the older transcripts from the college removed and leaving the most recent transcripts therein.  She states that when she contacted Army officials to have the duplicates removed she was told that they could not be removed because they are dated differently.  She states that some transcripts are older than others and need to be removed.

3.  The applicant provides an electronic mail message from an Army official pertaining to her transcripts, dated 30 July 2009; a transcript from Cochise College, dated 28 June 2005; and a transcript from Cochise College, dated 31 August 2005.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 January 1999 and is currently serving on active duty in the rank of sergeant first class.

2.  The applicant provided copies of Cochise College transcripts issued on 28 June 2005 and 31 August 2005 which show her last semester as the Fall semester in 2004.  Her cumulative credits totaled 85.00.

3.  A review of the applicant’s OMPF on the interactive Personnel Electronic Records Management System revealed copies of Cochise College transcripts dated 28 June 2005, 11 August 2005, and 5 October 2005.

4.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) provides policies, operating tasks, and steps governing the OMPF.  Table 2-1 of this Army regulation shows that transcripts of credit from civilian colleges are filed in the performance section of the OMPF.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends, in effect, that the Cochise College transcripts dated 31 August 2005 and 28 June 2005 should be removed from her OMPF.

2.  The evidence of record supports the applicant's contention that there are multiple Cochise College transcripts filed on her OMPF.  However, they all reflect different dates and they are properly filed in accordance with the applicable regulation.  There is no viable reason for removing the documents from her OMPF.  To the contrary, the appearance of multiple, differently-dated transcripts in her OMPF give the impression that she is making steady progress on attaining a college degree.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014187



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090014187



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020012

    Original file (20080020012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the removal of a civilian education transcript dated 11 October 2005 from her official military personnel file (OMPF). The applicant states that the transcript in question is an old transcript and she has since added one from the same college showing her degree awarded. The transcript in question is properly filed in the applicant's OMPF in accordance with the applicable regulations and she has failed to show through evidence submitted with her application and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000072

    Original file (20090000072.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the 4 June 2003 orders for her first award of the Good Conduct Medal and the 4 December 2008 revocation orders for this award be removed from her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant provides Permanent Orders 320-006, dated 18 November 2002; Permanent Orders 155-056, dated 4 June 2003; Permanent Orders 339-01, dated 4 December 2008; and copies of Central Carolina Community College transcripts issued on 17 April 1996 and 11 October...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011528

    Original file (20130011528.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests removal of the Cochise College Associates Degree Diploma, dated May 2010, from his official military personnel file (now known as Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing the Cochise College Associates Degree Diploma, dated May 2010, from his AMHRR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040007301C070208

    Original file (20040007301C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the military records be corrected to reflect a gender and name change. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to changing the applicant’s military records, to include the DD Form 214, to reflect the name and gender change.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005242

    Original file (20130005242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of her request to remove her Saint Regis University college transcript from her Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant states the transcript was removed from her AMHRR by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) on 3 September 2010; however, on 7 March 2013, 2 years and 6 months later the HRC re-posted it to her AMHRR because they lacked the supporting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001028

    Original file (20090001028.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following documents be removed from her official military personnel file (OMPF): Department of the Army (DA) Appointment Letter [APPT LTR], effective 2006-11-27; Application for Appointment [DA Form 61], Application for Active Duty [DA Form 160]; and Transcript of Credit for Civilian College/University/Trade/Business Schools [TRNSCPTS], effective 2003-06-23. The applicant's military personnel records show she reenlisted in the Regular Army on 28 February 2008 in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012401C070205

    Original file (20060012401C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records show that he enlisted in the Maine Army National Guard on 28 November 1995 and was ordered to active duty for training on 7 August 1996. The evidence of record shows that the governing Army regulation authorizes the filing of college transcripts in the OMPF. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant's college transcripts are filed in the performance section of his OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004435

    Original file (20130004435.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's contention that she was required to take another MS course to make up her grade in MS 302 was noted. The applicant's ROTC disenrollment proceedings show she was disenrolled for failure to maintain a minimum semester GPA of 3.0 or higher in all ROTC courses (she received a "C" grade in MS 302, spring semester 2004) and breach of contract as evidenced by her failure to enroll in MS 401, fall semester 2005 and her refusal to attend the LDAC 2005. Although the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003353

    Original file (20140003353.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his first transcript from Penn State University be removed from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as Official Military Personnel File (OMPF)). However, the second transcript is an official document that confirms his degree completion and provides an up-to-date version of his military records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing his first Penn State...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018488

    Original file (20140018488.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This NGB Form 78, dated 8 July 2014, did not recommend him for 1LT due to his having 36 months TIG. The NGB Form 78 stated [The Applicant] was not recommended for promotion and should be discharged upon his 36 month TIG date of 28 July 2014, due to his disenrollment from the ECP at his school. The evidence of record and the documents he provided confirmed that from the time he entered the GAARNG as an ECP 2LT on 28 July 2011 through the date of his discharge just over 36 months later on 12...