Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01992
Original file (PD-2013-01992.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2013-01992
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20140603
SEPARATION DATE: 20050215


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (35R/Avionics System Repair Person) medically separated for a polyarticular arthritis condition. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the occupational requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty. She was issued a permanent P3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The polyarticular arthritis condition, characterized as “polyarticular arthritis due to lupus erythematosus” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic polyarticular symptoms secondary to lupus erythematosus” as unfitting, rated 10%. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “My condition has worsened over the years and at this time there is no cure for my disease.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting polyarticular symptoms secondary to lupus erythematosus condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20041008
 VA – (2 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Polyarticular Symptoms Secondary to Lupus Erythematosus 6350 10% Lupus Erythematous L/Wrist 6350-5215 10%* 20041215
Lupus Erythematous R/Wrist 6350-5215 10%* 20041215
Lupus Erythematous L/Finger Joints 6350-5229 10%* 20041215
Lupus Erythematous R/Finger Joints 6350-5229 10%* 20041215
Other MEB/PEB Entries x 0
 Other x 1 20041215
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 40%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 50407 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ). *VARD 20060420 corrected coding effective day after separation. Each condition was originally coded 6350-5002.


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which her service-connected condition continues to burden her; but, must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.

Chronic Polyarticular Symptoms Secondary to Lupus Erythematosus Condition. Review of the available service treatment record revealed that the CI first developed joint symptoms in April 2003. She presented in September 2003 with complaints of morning stiffness and pain and swelling of her hands wrists and shoulders. The presence of finger joint inflammation on examination prompted laboratory evaluation which revealed the presence of a marker of inflammatory arthritis. Hand X-rays were normal. The CI was managed by a rheumatologist beginning in December 2003, but those records are not in evidence.

The narrative summary (NARSUM) examiner on 2 June 2004 (8.5 months prior to separation) reported that the CI’s functional limitations were due to polyarticular (multiple joint) arthritis due to lupus. Involved areas were the fingers of both hands and the wrists. Sporadic episodes of bilateral knee swelling were reported, but were self-limited. Symptomatic relief with an anti-inflammatory medication (Vioxx) was noted. The examiner was silent about other possible manifestations of lupus, except to note that there was no skin involvement (i.e. no rash). Physical exam showed swelling of the joints of the fingers and of both wrists.

At the separation exam on 2 June 2004 the CI indicated that she was currently in good health. The examiner noted swelling of the wrists and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints (middle knuckles) of the fingers. Blood pressure was normal and protein was absent from the urine (normal). On the Report of Medical Assessment, the CI indicated that arthritis limited her ability to work in her primary specialty. Lab testing for anemia was negative. The commander’s statement on 2 June 2004 indicated that the CI initially continued to perform her normal duties “at a moderate pace” but more recently was hampered by joint swelling and stiffness. She was reduced to performing administrative duties. At an outpatient visit on 31 August 2004 (5.5 months prior to separation) the CI indicated that she was not in any pain.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam on 15 December 2004 (2 months prior to separation), the CI reported that her symptoms were controlled on a different anti-inflammatory medication (Mobic). The examiner stated: “She really does not have any polyarticular symptoms at all.” Examination showed no evidence of joint inflammation or enlargement. At a C&P exam on 1 February 2006 (11.5 months after separation) the right hand dominant CI reported more involvement of her fingers and wrists. Swelling and pain interfered with her ability to lift luggage at her job as a ramp agent for an airline and in writing long papers or using the computer for long periods of time as a full-time college student. She also complained of generalized morning stiffness that made it difficult to dress in the morning. Fatigue also occurred throughout the day but did not significantly interfere with her life. She denied loss of appetite or weight, or fever, chills or night sweats. The CI was now being treated with an anti-rheumatologic medication (methotrexate). The most recent laboratory studies in September 2005 revealed the presence of indices suggesting rheumatologic disease (anti-nuclear antibodies and rheumatoid factor); but were negative for systemic inflammation or anemia. X-rays demonstrated narrowing of some joints in the hands suggestive of rheumatoid arthritis; and the examiner reported that a VA rheumatologist had recently diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis. Physical examination revealed synovial thickening and tenderness of both wrists (suggesting joint inflammation). Range-of-motion (ROM) measurement of the right wrist showed dorsiflexion of 75 degrees (normal to 70 degrees) and palmar flexion of 55 degrees (normal to 80 degrees). There was “little pain” with motion. The left wrist showed dorsiflexion of 20 degrees and palmar flexion of 28 degrees, with painful motion present at endpoints of ROM. On the right hand there was swelling and thickening of the 2nd, 3rd and 5th digits (index, middle and little fingers) and they lacked full extension at the PIP joints by 13, 5 and 10 degrees respectively. Swelling was also present at the 2nd and 3rd MCP joints (knuckle at the junction of hand and finger) and flexion of these joints was limited to the fingertips falling one centimeter (less than half an inch) from the transverse crease of the palm. The left hand showed synovial thickening only of the left 3rd PIP joint. It lacked full extension by 15 degrees; flexion was limited to the fingertip falling one centimeter from the transverse palm crease. The examiner’s impression was the likely diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis, given clinical findings and absence of other symptoms of lupus.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB assigned a 10% rating under the 6350 code (lupus erythematosus, systemic), which is justified for “exacerbations once or twice a year or symptomatic during the past 2 years.” The next higher 60% rating requires “exacerbations lasting a week or more, 2 or 3 times per year.” Board members agreed that the evidence does not support a rating higher than 10% via this pathway. Another option however is to combine the evaluation of disease residuals. This was the approach taken by the VA, who assigned separate 10% ratings under a combination 6350-5002 code (5002 – rheumatoid arthritis) for each wrist and each hand (identified as right finger joints and left finger joints, or “group of minor joints”). In deliberating this pathway, Board members acknowledged that each residual so rated must, by a preponderance of evidence standard, be identified as separately unfitting. Members agreed that the functional limitations in evidence justified the conclusion that impairment from each wrist and the fingers of each hand were independently unfitting; and, accordingly a separate rating for each is recommended. Although the NARSUM and MEB examinations identified joint swelling of bilateral wrists and fingers, they were silent regarding ROM, tenderness or painful motion, key elements in rendering a rating recommendation IAW §4.71a. However, the C&P exam 2 months prior to separation noted completely normal physical findings in the context of absent symptoms. Based on this exam, which was the closest to the time of separation and therefore assigned higher probative value by the Board majority, members agreed that a 0% rating was justified for each of the four identified areas. The Board acknowledged there was diagnostic uncertainty in this case, and that rheumatoid arthritis was diagnosed by a VA rheumatologist after separation. At the time of separation; however, the likely diagnosis was thought to be lupus; and a minimal rating under 5002 stipulates “a well-established diagnosis.” Board members concluded therefore that the 6530 code was the appropriate code to use. Given the rating recommendation as just elaborated, the Board concluded that there is no benefit to the CI in rating residuals of the disease. Therefore, after due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the chronic polyarticular symptoms secondary to lupus erythematosus condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the chronic polyarticular symptoms secondary to lupus erythematous condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board by a vote of 2:1 recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.



The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131025, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





                                   
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review



 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150002525 (PD201301992)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)
                                                     
CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00732

    Original file (PD2011-00732.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    There was also swelling of the ankles noted. The Board noted that the VA subsequently rated the joints individually on the 23 November 2011 decision, over 4 years after separation and considered whether there were chronic residuals at the time of separation warranting rating separate from the arthritis condition. The Board considered the final rheumatologic examination, three months prior to separation, which documented excellent control of her RA with “no signs of active synovitis”, and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02475

    Original file (PD-2013-02475.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The internal medicine evaluation on 6 January 2006, noted symptoms resolving and a normal examination with “no evidence of overt arthritis,” “no signs of SLE flare and all signs of prior flare now resolved.” There are no further service treatment record entries prior to...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01650

    Original file (PD-2013-01650.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The record indicated that the CI developed pain in the hands, wrists,knees, and feet with morning stiffness in December 2002. Exam documented bilateral wrist swelling and tenderness with painful ROM to VA normal limits.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01081

    Original file (PD 2014 01081.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the rheumatology evaluation on 24 February 2009, she was doing well and her joint examination was normal (without swelling, tenderness or limitation of motion of any joint).The MEB narrative summary dated 31 March 2009 reported the CI had responded well to treatment and had no symptoms or pain at that time. The examination of the joints was normal (no swelling, tenderness, limitation of motion or guarding of movement) and the examiner concluded there was no evidence of active rheumatoid...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01170

    Original file (PD2010-01170.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : The CI states: “Low Back Fusion, Chronic Right side Radiculpathy, Migraine Headaches, Arthritis, Nephrolithiasis and Lupus.” She additionally lists all of her VA conditions and ratings as per the rating chart below. The rating was upheld by the FPEB on 4 August 2006, 2 months prior to separation, noting the CI’s contention for medical retirement, but finding no evidence supporting a rating of greater than 20%. In the matter of the radiculopathy right lower extremity,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01236

    Original file (PD 2012 01236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the RA condition as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The examiner noted swelling and tenderness of wrists as well as hands, knees, ankles, feet, and decreased strength testing, (2/5) due to extremely painful joint movement. The PEB and VA both coded the RA as 5002 (arthritis rheumatoid) and rated it 20% using the service treatment records (STRs).

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01080

    Original file (PD2011-01080.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pre-Separation) – All Effective Date 20060215 Condition Rheumatoid Arthritis Coccidioidomycosis Code 5002 6835 Rating 20% 0% ↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓ Rheumatoid Arthritis Coccidioidomycosis Condition Code 5002 6835 Not Service-Connected x 4 Rating 10%* 50%** Exam 20090115 20090310 20090115 Combined: 20% Combined: 60% *Initially not service connected and not associated with 6835. The NARSUM states the CI continued to have pain affecting multiple joints and was unable to perform the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00081

    Original file (PD2012-00081.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the bilateral knee condition as unfitting, rated 10% for each knee with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00689

    Original file (PD2009-00689.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    All evidence considered, there is not reasonable doubt in the CI’s favor supporting a change from the PEB’s 20% rating decision for the rheumatoid arthritis condition. Service Treatment Record. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01046

    Original file (PD2011-01046.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded rheumatoid arthritis to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. The PEB adjudicated the rheumatoid arthritis condition as unfitting, rated 20% with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The examiner concluded: “Although she is capable of performing her duties within her MOS, she cannot participate sufficiently in field training and is non-deployable, her overall performance of duty as a soldier...