Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01204
Original file (PD-2013-01204.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX        CASE: PD - 20 1 3 - 0 1204
BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS   BOARD DATE: 201 5 0113
Separation Date: 20051130


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-5 (Helicopter Mechanic, CH-46) medically separated for a left leg muscle injury caused by rocket shrapnel. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was placed on limited duty and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The condition, characterized as “other open fracture of lower end of femur” and “late effects of other accidents,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated the muscle injury as unfitting and rated it at 10%. The PEB also identified two other Category II conditions: “shortening left femur, 2cm” and “open left distal femur fracture, status post (s/p) open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) and iliac crest bone grafting – now with healed fracture.” The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION : The CI elaborated no specific contention in his application.


 SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting muscle injury condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.


RATING COMPARISON :
invalid font number 31502
Service IPEB – Dated 20050822
 VA - (2 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Late Effects of Injuries Related to Fracture of Lower Extremity 5314 10% Residuals, Postoperative Shrapnel Injury Left Lower Extremity 5255-5314 50% 20051007
Shortening Left Femur 2cm. Category II
Open Left Distal Femur Fracture s/p ORIF and Iliac Crest Bone Grafting Category II
Other x0
 Other x9 20051007
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 80%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20060130 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS])


ANALYSIS SUMMARY : The PEB adjudicated s hortening l eft f emur 2cm. and o pen l eft d istal f emur f rac ture s/p ORIF and i liac c rest b o ne g rafting as Category II conditions ( “ Conditions that contribute to the unfitting condition”). The Category II conditions will be discussed under the l ate e ffects of i njuries r elated to f racture of l ower e xtremity Category I unfitting condition.

Late Effects of Injuries Related to Fracture of Lower Extremity Condition . On 14 January 2005, t he CI sustained a shrapnel injury to his left femur from a 122 mm rocket . The shrapnel injury resulted in a fist sized soft tissue defect over the anterior aspect of the distal left femur with a bone fracture. While in theater, t he CI underwent emergent treatment of the wound and then he was evacuated by air to a tertiary care facility in Germany for additional care. He was then evacuated state-side for surgical treatment. The CI underwent several procedures for advanced wound care and ultimately underwent ORIF of the left femur on 27 January 2005 . H e was discharged on 1 February 2005. He returned 6 week s later for bone grafting material to be placed in the 3cm bone defect to promote healing. He healed well and presented for re-evaluation 6 weeks after the bone graft . That evaluation revealed that the CI had been able to walk pretty well , had gone to physical therapy (PT) and had good range - of - motion (ROM). The physical exam findings were well healed scars, excellent motion with full extension, flexion of 120 degrees (140 degrees normal), and no tenderness. He was able to hold his knee extended against resistance without problems. X-rays performed at this visit demonstrated a large plate in good position, bone graft in place with good callous formation and no significant ossification within the quadriceps muscle. The examiner ordered that the CI could progress to weight bearing and low level walking ; however , he c ould not do any running, or jumping . Over the ensuing 2 months the CI continued PT with his final PT evaluation 4 months prior to separation. At that evaluation he had an antalgic gait with a leg length discrepancy, decreased pain, atrophy of the lower left leg, full flexion of his hips with reduced internal rotation, and knee flexion of 103 degrees. His left leg strength was normal and his balance was fair to good. The MEB n arrative s ummary exam approximately 5 months prior to separation documented that CI was able to walk without assistance but was unable to run. The examiner documented that a s o nogram confirmed a 2 cm leg length discrepancy , left shorter than the right. There was left knee grinding when riding a bike or performing an exercise with knee flexion to 90 degrees or greater with significant quadriceps weakness. There were physical exam findings of a gait abnormality , a palpable defect with weakness in the quadriceps musculature ; and left knee ROM flexion of 120 degree s . There was normal strength , pulses and sensation in the left lower leg .

The VA Compensation and Pension exam approximately 2 months after separation documented that the CI could not exercise, lift heavy objects , and had problems walking up stairs. The physical exam revealed significant scaring of the left thigh with tenderness but no instability, adherence, or keloid formation. The examiner documented a normal gait in spite of the leg length discrepancy. Muscle palpation demonstrated impairment of muscle tone and some signs of lower endurance and strength of 4/5 in the thigh muscle groups . After repetitive joint function on the left side, the joint function was additionally limited by pain. The left knee had crepitus , flexion of 110 degrees with pain which was additionally limited by pain after repetitive motion. The left ankle had full ROM; however , there was pain after repetitive motion. His hip ROM was normal except for an external rotation of 40 degrees (60 degrees is normal). The CI required corrective shoes for the difference in leg length. Lower leg sensation and pulses were normal.

The Board directed attenti on to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence . The PEB coded the l ate e ffects of i njuries r elated to f racture of l ower e xtremity condition as 5314 ( Group XIV Muscle Injury ) and rated i t 10%. The VA coded the r esiduals, p ost - operative s hrapnel i njury l eft l ower e xtremity condition as 5255 ( femur impairment ) with 5314 and rated it 50% . The VARD documented that they applied a “non-schedular” evaluation “…because there is involvement of muscle groups that are in the same anatomical region interfering with more than one joint (left hip, knee, and ankle). ” The Board reviewed the record for evidence related to the hip and ankle in an effort to understand the VA’s rating scheme. The evidence documents that at the time of separation the CI’s hip had a slight decrease in internal rotation as the only impairment. His ankle had a normal ROM with pain only after repetitive use. His gait was described as normal in spite of the leg length discrepancy. After discussion, Board members agree that the evidence does not support any additionally compensable impairment to the hip or ankle from the Group XIV muscle injury. The Board agrees that VASRD code 5314 is the most appropriate code for rating the CI’s disability as applied by the PEB and VA. In preparing the recommendation, the Board reviewed VASRD § 4.56 , e valuation of muscle disabilities , and noted the following entry:

“ An open comminuted fracture with muscle or tendon damage will be rated as a severe injury of the muscle group involved unless, for locations such as in the wrist or over the tibia, evidence establishes that the muscle damage is minimal. ”

The record contains w ell documented evidence of significant left thigh muscle injury with an open, comminuted femur fracture that required ORIF and subsequent bone grafting. Although the CI had a reasonably good recovery, he still manifested a leg discrepancy, palpable defect in the quadriceps musculature with weakness, and limited knee ROM with pain. After due deliberation, considering all of the evide nce and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (r easonable doubt) and §4.56 , the Board recommends a disability rating of 40 % for the l ate e ffects of i njuries r elated to f racture of l ower e xtremity condition.


 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the l ate e ffects of i njuries r elated to fr acture of l ower e xtremity condition, the Board by a majority vote recommends a disability rating of 40% , coded 5314 IAW VASRD §4.7 3 . The single voter for dissent elected not to submit a minority opinion. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows ; and , that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Late Effects of Injuries Related to Fracture of Lower Extremity 5314 4 0%
COMBINED 4 0%
invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 130904 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record






                          
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review
MEMORANDUM FOR COMMANDER, NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
         DEPUTY COMMANDANT, MANPOWER & RESERVE AFFAIRS
        
Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) PDBR ltr dtd 26 May 15 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         (c) PDBR ltr dtd 7 May 15 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         (d) PDBR ltr dtd 7 May 15 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

1. Pursuant to reference (a) I approve the recommendations of the Physical Disability Board of Review set forth in references (b) through (d).

2. The official records of the following individuals are to be corrected to reflect the stated disposition:

a. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC: Entitlement to disability severance pay with a disability rating of 20 percent (increased from 10 percent) effective date of discharge.

b. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USN: Entitlement to disability severance pay with a disability rating of 20 percent (increased from 10 percent) effective date of discharge.

c. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, former USMC: Placement on the Permanent Disability Retired List with a 40 percent disability rating effective date of discharge.

3. Please ensure all necessary actions are taken to implement these decisions, including the recoupment of disability severance pay, if warranted, and notification to the subject members once those actions are completed.



                           XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Assistant General Counsel
                 (Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00497

    Original file (PD2009-00497.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was separated with a 10% disability rating determined by the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Naval and Department of Defense regulations. The VA diagnoses included: Focal atrophy of the vastus medialis muscle, minimal; right femur fracture requiring open reduction internal fixation, retrograde insertion of rod; anesthesia of strip below the knee medial aspect from the medial knee to the medial ankle, approximately two inches wide, decreased pin...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | pd2009-00563

    Original file (pd2009-00563.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES. Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record. I recommend coding and rating 8599-8520 at 40% as an accurate rating of the CI's left lower extremity disability.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01511

    Original file (PD-2013-01511.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Right Femoral Shaft Stress Fracture Condition . The diagnoses were listed asright femoral shaft stress fracture; bilateral medial tibial plateau stress reactions; right second metatarsal stress reaction; and bilateral...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01887

    Original file (PD-2013-01887.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The thigh condition, characterized as “chronic left thigh pain secondary to abundant callus and quadriceps adhesion” and “saphenous nerve palsy (sensory) after gunshot wound,” were the only two conditions forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic left thigh pain secondary to abundant callus and quadriceps adhesion” and “saphenous nerve palsy (sensory) after gunshot wound to left thigh” as unfitting, rated 0% and 0%, respectively,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00821

    Original file (PD2012-00821.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20040131 Code Rating Exam Service FPEB – Dated 20030625 Condition Comminuted Right Intertrochanteric and Subtrochanteric Fractures, Status Post ORIF Left Clavicular Fracture 5299-5003 Code CAT III Combined: 20% Rating 20% Condition Residual, Fracture; Femur, Right, Post-Operative with DJD Right Hip, and Right Knee Loss of motion Residual Fracture left Clavicle 5255 20% 20040402 5201-5010 10% 20040402 Combined: 30% ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board’s authority...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016919

    Original file (20080016919.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests the applicant be medically retired from active duty with a disability rating of not less the 30 percent. Counsel states the formal physical evaluation board (PEB) failed to provide the applicant and counsel adequate time to prepare for the formal hearing. The formal PEB corrected the informal PEB by separating the two muscle groups and rating each as 10 percent disabling.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01579

    Original file (PD2012 01579.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    His fracture healed but he had pain in his left femur and his left hip at the bone graft site. **Limited extension.The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The PEB rated the chronic pain left femur fracture condition at 10% using an analogous 5003 code (degenerative arthritis) based on the USAPDA pain policy.The VA separately rated the left lower extremity for twoinjuries: 5262 (impairment of tibia and fibula) and 5257 (knee, other impairment of)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00755

    Original file (PD2012-00755.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronic Pain Left Hip Condition. 3 PD1200755 RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: VASRD CODE RATING 5003 COMBINED 10% 10% Chronic Pain Left Hip UNFITTING CONDITION The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120605, w/atchs Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00790

    Original file (PD2011-00790.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    Left Thigh Muscle Condition . All members agreed that the thigh muscle injury and open comminuted fracture of the femur with IM rod and nails was an integral part of the CI’s injury and disability that rendered the CI incapable of continued service within his MOS; and, accordingly merits a separate service rating. Painful Thigh Scars Condition .

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00029

    Original file (PD2012-00029.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Hip pain was also noted on knee ROM testing. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20120020004 (PD201200029)