RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS
SEPARATION DATE: 20030731
NAME: X
CASE NUMBER: PD1201639
BOARD DATE: 20130306
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an active duty LCpl/E-3 (6173/CH-53 Crew Chief) medically
separated for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) of the right ankle. He was treated, but did not
improve adequately to fully perform his military duties or meet physical fitness standards. He
was placed on limited duty (LIMDU) and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The
MEB listed four ankle conditions on the NAVMED 6100/1, and referred him to a Physical
Evaluation Board (PEB). The PEB found him unfit due to tibial OCD of the right ankle, and rated
it 10%. The other three ankle conditions were all adjudicated as Category II (contributing to the
unfitting condition). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated with a 10% disability
rating.
CI CONTENTION: “The medical condition and subsequent surgery that forced me out of the
Marine Corps caused me daily pain at the time of discharge and continues to degenerate. In
addition to the original PEB, the VA found additional conditions that should have been
considered at the time. The VA found my total disability rating at 30% which would have made
me eligible for retirement.”
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review as defined in DoDI 6040.44, is limited to those
conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military
service or when requested by the CI, those conditions “identified but not determined to be
unfitting by the PEB.” The unfitting right ankle condition (osteochondritis dissecans of the tibia)
meets the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 and is addressed below. Since the other three
ankle conditions all contribute to the unfitting condition, they too are addressed below.
However, no other conditions are within the Board’s purview. Any condition outside the
Board’s defined scope of review may be eligible for future consideration by the Board for
Correction of Naval Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
Navy PEB – dated 20030604
Condition
Right Ankle OCD
Right Ankle Instability
Right Ankle Pain
Right Ankle Fracture
Code
5299-5003
Rating
10%
Category II
Category II
Category II
VA (2 weeks Pre-Separation) – All Effective 20030801
Condition
Code
Rating
Exam
Right Ankle Condition
5299-5271
10%
20030711
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓
Combined: 10%
Right Shoulder Condition
Tinnitus
5299-5203
6260
0% x 6 / Not Service Connected x 3
10%
10%
20030711
20030710
20030711
Combined: 30%
ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the sentiment expressed by the CI regarding
the impairment with which his conditions continue to burden him, and the significant impact
they have had on his quality of life. It is noted for the record that the Board is subject to the
same laws for disability entitlements as those under which the Disability Evaluation System
(DES) operates. The DES has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for
future severity or potential complications of conditions. That role and authority is granted to
the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). The Board evaluates DVA evidence in arriving at its
recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness and rating
determinations at the time of separation. While the DES considers all of the CI's medical
conditions, compensation can only be offered for those conditions that cut short a member’s
career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of separation. The DVA,
however, is empowered to compensate for all service-connected conditions and to periodically
re-evaluate conditions for the purpose of adjusting the Veteran’s disability rating should the
degree of impairment change over time.
Right Ankle Condition. This CI injured his right ankle in December 2001. Magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) showed a possible osteochondritis dissecans lesion of the distal tibia. He was
treated with touch down weight bearing (TDWB) for 7 weeks, but his pain persisted. Further
evaluation found an old talar fracture, as well as subtalar instability. He then had ankle surgery
to fix the problems with his right ankle. After surgery and post-operative rehabilitation his
symptoms were better. However, he continued to have persistent right ankle pain and an MEB
was initiated.
The MEB clinical evaluation was on 24 February 2003. At that exam, he had good range-of-
motion (ROM), and no numbness. His strength was improving and he was full weight-bearing.
Active dorsiflexion was 10 degrees and passive plantar flexion was 40 degrees, with good
inversion-eversion. Motor strength was normal. In July 2003, the CI had a VA Compensation
and Pension (C&P) exam. He reported that he was not able to run or do stairs because the right
ankle was painful and fatigued easily. On exam, the ankle was somewhat painful to lateral and
medial flexion. The CI could not hop on the right leg due to pain in the right ankle. There was
no objective evidence of motor weakness or other neurological findings. The two ROM
evaluations which the Board weighed in arriving at its recommendation are summarized below.
MEB ~5 Mo. Pre-Sep
(20030224)
VA C&P ~2 weeks Pre-Sep
(20030711)
Right Ankle ROM
Dorsiflexion (20⁰ is normal)
Plantar Flexion (45⁰ is normal)
§4.71a Rating
10⁰
40⁰
10%*
20⁰
45⁰
10%*
*10% based on VASRD §4.40 (Functional loss), §4.45 (The joints), and §4.59 (Painful motion)
The Board carefully reviewed all available evidence. The PEB and VA chose different coding
options for the right ankle condition, but both assigned a rating of 10%. Using clinical data in
the treatment record, the CI’s right ankle was non-compensable based on the Veterans’
Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) §4.71a codes for loss of ankle motion
(5270 through 5272). However, IAW VASRD §4.40, §4.45, and §4.59, a 10% rating is warranted
when there is satisfactory evidence of functional limitation due to painful motion of a major
joint. The Board tried to find a path to a higher rating for the right ankle, but there was not
sufficient evidence to justify a rating higher than 10%. After due deliberation, considering all of
the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability
rating of 10% for the unfitting right ankle condition (tibial osteochondritis dissecans).
Other PEB Conditions. Three other ankle conditions were adjudicated by the PEB as Category II
(related to and contributing to the unfitting condition). These three other conditions were:
right ankle subtalar functional instability, persistent right ankle pain, and right ankle lateral
process fracture of the talus. They were all reviewed by the action officer and considered by
the Board. The evidence in the treatment record supports the conclusion that these conditions
were indeed related to and contributed to the unfitting condition. It is therefore appropriate
2 PD1201639
that these three conditions be considered Category II. After due deliberation, considering all of
the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board unanimously
recommends no change to the PEB adjudication of these three other ankle conditions.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the
unfitting right ankle condition (OCD of the tibia), the Board unanimously recommends no
change to the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the other three PEB conditions (right ankle
subtalar functional instability, persistent right ankle pain, and right ankle lateral process
fracture of the talus) the Board unanimously recommends no change to the PEB adjudication.
There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of
the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:
Right Ankle Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Tibia
UNFITTING CONDITION
VASRD CODE RATING
5299-5003
COMBINED
10%
10%
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120731, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record
X
Acting Director
Physical Disability Board of Review
3 PD1201639
MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW
BOARDS
Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS
Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 04 Apr 13
In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and, for
the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandum, approve the recommendations of the PDBR
that the following individual’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either characterization
of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s
Physical Evaluation Board:
- xformer USMC
- xformer USN
- xformer USMC
- xformer USMC
- xformer USN
- xformer USMC
- xformer USMC
- xformer USN
- xformer USMC
- xformer USN
- xformer USMC
x
Assistant General Counsel
(Manpower & Reserve Affairs)
4 PD1201639
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01566
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS SEPARATION DATE: 20030615 NAME: X CASE NUMBER: PD1201566 BOARD DATE: 20130305 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty LCPL/E-3 (0341/Mortar Man), medically separated for right ankle osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) status post (s/p) scope and debridement right ankle. Right Ankle Condition. RECOMMENDATION: The...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00545
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW Code 5271 Exam STR BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS SEPARATION DATE: 20011231 NAME: XX CASE NUMBER: PD1200545 BOARD DATE: 20130201 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty L.Cpl./E-3 (9900/Recruit), medically separated for osteochondritis dissecans, left posteromedial talus, surgically treated twice. Both the PEB and VA rated the ankle at 10%,...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00722
The VA exam noted painful right ankle ROM, as listed above. The VA rated the left and right ankle conditions separately as follows; coded 5271 painful limitation of ROM at 10% each for an overall rating of 20%. In the matter of the chronic bilateral ankle pain, due to right talar OCD lesion and left ankle chondromalacia condition, the Board unanimously recommends that it be rated for two separate unfitting conditions as follows: left ankle chondromalacia condition coded 5014‐5271 and rated...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00874
The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the right ankle condition as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The PEB rated the ankle condition using the code 5271, limited motion of ankle with 10% disability. 2 PD1200874 RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION Osteochondritis Desiccans...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00009
Other PEB Conditions . The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES. In the matter of the osteochondritis dissecans condition of the right knee and IAW with VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00753
The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left ankle condition and that there was...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00718
The CI was then medically separated with a 20% combined disability rating. ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, Right Lower Extremity8799-872520%Healing Osteochondritis Dissecans s/p Arthroscopic Procedures with Reflux Sympathetic Dystrophy ligamentous injury, limitation of motion, muscle weakness and altered sensation of the right ankle, foot and lower leg, atrophy of the right calf, and residual tender scars5299-526250%*20090202Numbness/Nerve Pain In...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00784
The DVT condition was determined to be not unfitting. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44 (Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The right knee (all aspects) and the...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01438
The Board did not find evidence that supported more than a moderate deformity of the talus.The PEB listed sinus tarsi syndrome of the right ankle as a condition related to the primary unfitting right ankle condition but not separately ratable (Category II). Pes planus was noted on the MEB NARSUM examination however service treatment records reflect treatment for ankle pain but not for impairment due to pes planus.The condition was reviewed and considered by the Board. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01544
Right Ankle Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the right ankle condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously...