RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME:
BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS
CASE NUMBER: PD1200214 SEPARATION DATE: 20050430
BOARD DATE: 20121114
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an activated Reserve CPL/E-4 (3112, Traffic Management Specialist),
medically separated for posttraumatic osteochondritis desiccans, right talar dome, and
posttraumatic right ankle arthrosis. The CI sustained a severe right ankle inversion injury when
he was under fire in Iraq, ran for protection and jumped into a three foot deep hole. Despite
three cortisone injections; non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS); rehabilitation and
orthopedic consults; a diagnostic arthroscopy abrasion chondroplasty and a right ankle
reconstruction surgery by arthroscopy; aggressive physical therapy (PT) and use of an ankle
brace and cane, the CI failed to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational
Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued placed on light duty and
referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The PEB adjudicated the posttraumatic
osteochondritis desiccans, right talar dome, condition as unfitting, rated 20%, with application
of the Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1332.39 and Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for
Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The PEB also adjudicated the posttraumatic right ankle arthrosis
condition as related Category II diagnosis (“contributing to the unfitting condition”). The CI
made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 20% disability rating.
CI CONTENTION: “THEY RATED ME FOR THE RIGHT ANKLE TRAUMA AFTER THE MEDICAL
BOARD WAS DONE I HAD ANOTHER ANKLE SURGERY WITHOUT IT BEEN TAKEN IN
CONSIDERATION AT THE PEB. ALSO I WAS BEING THREATED FOR PTSD, BACK PAIN AND
SHOULDER PAIN. THE OTHER CONDITION WHERE CONNECTED BY VETERANS ADMINISTRATION
BUT I HAD SINCE BEING MEDICALLY DISCHARGE I HAD TO SPEND AROUNG $ 500 A MONTH FOR
MEDICAL INSURANCE FOR ME AND MY FAMILY. THE MAJORITY WAS FOR ME. I HAD THE
FOLLOWING CONDITIONS CONNECTED TO THE SERVICE SINCE MAY 1, 2005 ONE DAY AFTER MY
END OF ACTIVE SERVICE: 1. DYSTHTMIC DISORDER 2. RIGHT ANKLE Arthritis 3. LOW BACK
PROBLEMS 4. KNEE PROBLEMS (sic).”
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI
6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the
CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The unfitting right ankle trauma condition
meets the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview, and is accordingly addressed
below. The other requested conditions are not within the Board’s purview. Any conditions or
contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of
review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
Condition
Posttraumatic
Osteochondritis
Desiccans, Right Talar
Dome
Posttraumatic Right Ankle
Arthrosis
Service PEB – Dated 20050224
VA (~3 Mos. Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20050501
Code
Rating
Condition
Code
Rating
Exam
5099-5003
20%
Category 2
S/P Right Ankle Sprain w/ Residual
FX & Ligament Rupture;
Posttraumatic Osteochondritis,
Posttraumatic Arthrosis
5271
20%
20050808
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
Combined: 20%
Dysthymic Disorder . . . . .
Discogenic Disease, Spondylosis, &
Posterior Disc Protrusion T11-T12
Left Knee PFS
9433
5243
5260
0% X 2 / Not Service-Connected x 4*
Combined: 60%*
30%
10%*
10%*
20050829
20061207*
20061207*
20050808
* VARD 20050908 (Original) granted combined rating of 40%. CI appealed two non-service connected conditions (LBP & Lt Knee
PFS). After new C&P exam on 20061207, VARD 20070319 awarded full grant of appeal, adding both conditions and raising
combined rating to 60%, all retroactive to DOS.
ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges that the MEB was not available in the evidence
before it; and, could not be located after the appropriate inquiries. Further attempts at
obtaining the relevant documentation would likely be futile. The missing evidence potentially
relates only to the scope of the Board discussed above; and, it is not suspected that the missing
evidence would significantly alter the Board’s recommendations. The Board also acknowledges
the CI’s assertions that the PEB did not take his second right ankle surgery into consideration
when adjudicating his case. It is noted for the record that the Board has neither the jurisdiction
nor authority to scrutinize or render opinions in reference to the CI’s statements in the
application regarding suspected service-improprieties in the processing of his case. The Board’s
role is confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness
of PEB rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on severity at the time of
separation. It must also judge the fairness of PEB fitness adjudications based on the fitness
consequences of conditions as they existed at the time of separation.
Right Ankle Condition (Posttraumatic Osteochondritis Desiccans, Right Talar Dome; and
Posttraumatic Right Ankle Arthrosis). Both of the PEB right ankle conditions were considered in
rating the right ankle condition. There were three goniometric range-of-motion (ROM)
evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board
weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the chart below.
Right Ankle ROM
MEB ~4.5 Mo. Pre-Sep
Rehab consult ~2 Mo. Post-Sep
VA C&P ~3 Mo. Post-Sep
Dorsiflexion (0-20⁰)
Plantar Flexion (0-45⁰)
Comment: Surgery
20050418; 2 mo. after
the PEB and .5 mo. prior
to separation
§4.71a Rating
5⁰
“full”
Lace up brace; antalgic gait;
effusion; global tenderness
to palpation(TTP); pain with
resisted ankle motions; well
healed incisions;
sensation/motor intact
20%
17⁰
25⁰
Diffuse tenderness; “Right leg
appears thinner - Right 34cm
Left 39.5cm; “uses cane/brace
at times”
20%
10⁰
15⁰
Limping gait; tenderness ankle;
ankle brace; TTP; unable to
repetitively stand on heels/toes
due to pain; manual muscle
testing dorsiflexors/plantar
flexor 3/5
20%
The right ankle pain condition was well documented in the service treatment record (STR). The
CI fractured the right ankle in March 2003 which was confirmed by an X-ray in May 2003 that
demonstrated a fracture of the lateral malleolus. The CI continued with right ankle inversion,
pain and laxity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in December 2003 indicated a tear in the
calcaneofibular ligament and a small avulsion fracture in the posterior aspect of the distal
2 PD1200214
fibula. The CI underwent a diagnostic arthroscopy and abrasion chondroplasty in March 2004.
There was minimal improvement in the right ankle and an MRI indicated an occult fracture
involving the posterolateral aspect of the talus.
The MEB examination performed
approximately 4 months prior to separation, noted continued pain when walking; an inability to
run or jump; intermittent swelling; pain worse with cold and activity; and mild pain relief with
NSAIDS. The MEB physical exam findings summarized in the chart above.
In May 2005, the CI underwent right ankle reconstruction surgery by arthroscopy (PEB dated
24 February 2005). The rehabilitation consult 2 months after to separation noted that the right
ankle joint had been injected three times with cortisone and the CI required a cane and
ankle/foot supports for ambulation due to the sharp pain. The exam findings are summarized
in the chart above. The VA Compensation & Pension examination, performed 3 months after
separation, noted right ankle swelling, stiffness; weekly flare-ups; instability and give-way
sensation, fatigue ability and lack of endurance; precipitating factors of prolonged standing,
ambulation or trying to jog which exacerbated pain and use of an ankle brace for ambulation.
The exam findings are summarized in the chart above with ROM testing including additional
functional loss due to pain.
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The
PEB coded the right ankle condition as 5099 analogous to 5003 arthritis, degenerative
(hypertrophic or osteoarthritis) rated 20%. The VA coded this condition 5271 Ankle, limited
motion of: marked and rated 20%. All exams in evidence supported a 20% rating and the VA
exam was following the post-PEB ankle surgery.
The Board considered that the coding of 5099-5003 at 20% would require “occasional
incapacitating exacerbations” while the VA coding schema using 5271 focused on limitation of
motion which would be more ideal coding for the right ankle condition. Although the 5271
coding would be closer to “ideal,” neither coding is incorrect, nor would any change of coding
increase the rating level or benefit the CI.
After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable
doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the
PEB adjudication for the posttraumatic osteochondritis desiccans, right talar dome condition.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB
reliance on DoDI 1332.39 and VASRD for rating posttraumatic osteochondritis desiccans, right
talar dome condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently
of that instruction by the Board. In the matter of the posttraumatic osteochondritis desiccans,
right talar dome and associated posttraumatic right ankle arthrosis conditions and IAW VASRD
§4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no
other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.
3 PD1200214
RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of
the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:
UNFITTING CONDITION
Posttraumatic Osteochondritis Desiccans, Rt Talar Dome (and
Posttraumatic Right Ankle Arthrosis Cat 2)
VASRD CODE RATING
5099-5003
COMBINED
20%
20%
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120228, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
4 PD1200214
MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL
OF REVIEW BOARDS
Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATIONS
Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44
(b) CORB ltr dtd 26 Nov 12
In accordance with reference (a), I have reviewed the cases forwarded by reference (b), and,
for the reasons provided in their forwarding memorandum, approve the recommendations of
the PDBR that the following individual’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in either
characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department
of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board:
- former USN
- former USMC
- former USMC
- former USMC
- former USMC
Assistant General Counsel
(Manpower & Reserve Affairs)
5 PD1200214
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00626
The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES. The Board determined therefore that none of the stated conditions were subject to service disability rating. I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of Review Mr. XXXX’s records not be corrected to reflect a change in...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00810
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: navy CASE NUMBER: PD1100810 SEPARATION DATE: 20061201 BOARD DATE: 20120511 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty CTT2/E-5 (1733, Electronic Warfare Systems Technician), medically separated for a right ankle condition (osteochondral defect, right talar dome). Right Ankle Condition. CI elected not to have surgery...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00631
Although there was limitation of motion, the normal gait on multiple examinations was not consistent with a moderate limitation of motion for the minimum rating under this code. It noted that the VASRD states that the intent is that the painful joint is “entitled to at least the minimum compensable rating for the joint.” After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.59 (painful motion) and VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01306
No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “right ankle pain secondary to osteochondral fracture and surgery” as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. At the MEB/NARSUM evaluation approximately 7months prior to separation, physical examination noted right ankle dorsiflexion of 5 degrees with crepitus without significant associated pain on motion. ...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00566
The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the stiffness of the right ankle with calcific tendonitis of the Achilles tendon as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board considered if the Achilles tendonitis was a separately unfitting condition. The Board then considered the ankle condition and noted that ankylosis of a joint indicates fusion and that there is no motion with joint fusion.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01566
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS SEPARATION DATE: 20030615 NAME: X CASE NUMBER: PD1201566 BOARD DATE: 20130305 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty LCPL/E-3 (0341/Mortar Man), medically separated for right ankle osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) status post (s/p) scope and debridement right ankle. Right Ankle Condition. RECOMMENDATION: The...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00724
The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) and was found unfit for continued military service due to the left ankle condition. As noted above, the Navy PEB (June 2004) adjudicated the left ankle condition as unfitting and rated it at 10%. This condition was judged by the Board to be not unfitting at the time of separation from service, and is not relevant for disability rating.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00566
He was placed on limited duty (LIMDU) and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Left Ankle Condition . Ankle motion was mildly limited, and painful.
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01820
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The gait was noted as being normal at the time of the VA C&P, over 5 months after separation and almost 11 months after the second surgery. The PEB and VA both adjudicated a 10% rating, the former citing the pain...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00753
The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the left ankle condition and that there was...