RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
SEPARATION DATE: 20031216
NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
CASE NUMBER: PD1101003
BOARD DATE: 20130130
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this
covered individual (CI) was an active duty PFC/E-4 (11B/Infantryman), medically separated for
chronic right shoulder pain. He injured his right shoulder during a field training exercise.
Despite surgical repair and 14 months of physical therapy he did not respond adequately to
treatment and was unable to perform within his Military Occupational Specialty or meet
physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent U3/H2/E2 profile and underwent a
Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Chronic right shoulder pain was forwarded to the Physical
Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. Total hearing loss, right ear
status post (s/p) resection of acoustic neuroma, right facial paresis, s/p resection of acoustic
neuroma, neuropathic keratitis right eye, post-surgical headaches, mild intermittent positional
vertigo, and mild nerve root dysfunction right upper extremity as identified in the rating chart
below, were forwarded on the MEB submission as medically acceptable conditions. The PEB
adjudicated the chronic right shoulder pain condition as unfitting, rated 10% with application of
the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The remaining conditions were
determined to be not unfitting. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a
10% combined disability rating.
CI CONTENTION: “All medical conditions have exacerbated. I also feel that the rating I was
given is incorrect. I gave the military 110% and they gave me 10%. Everyone from the
beginning told me to appeal but it could take 1-3 years.”
SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI
6040.44 Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2) is limited to those conditions which were determined
by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the
CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The ratings
for unfitting conditions will be reviewed in all cases. The total hearing loss; right ear s/p
resection of acoustic neuroma; right facial paresis, s/p resection of acoustic neuroma;
neuropathic keratitis right eye; post-surgical headaches; mild intermittent positional vertigo;
and mild nerve root dysfunction right upper extremity conditions requested for consideration
and the unfitting right shoulder pain condition meet the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for
Board purview, and are accordingly addressed below. Any conditions or contention not
requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain
eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.
RATING COMPARISON:
Service IPEB – Dated 20030827
Code
Condition
Chronic Right Shoulder
5099-5003
Pain
Mild
Positional Vertigo
Right Facial Paresis
Intermittent
Not Unfitting
Not Unfitting
Rating
10%
Nerve
Surgical
Post
Headaches
Mild
Root
Sensory Dysfunction
Right Upper Extremity
Neurotrophic Keratitis,
Right Eye,
Not Unfitting
Not Unfitting
Not Unfitting
Hearing Loss
Not Unfitting
30%*
Persistent
Code
5203
VA (3 Mo. Pre Separation) – All Effective Date 20031217
Rating
Condition
Right Shoulder Acromioclavicular
20%
Separation Status Post Repair
7th Cranial (facial) Nerve Palsy
with
Headache,
Vertigo and Diminished Sense of
Smell on the Right Side of the
Nose Associated with Right Side
Acoustic Neuroma, Status Post
Craniotomy
Sensory Dysfunction Right Upper
Extremity Associated with Right
Shoulder Surgical Repair
Neuropathic Keratitis Right Eye
Associated with Right
Side
Acoustic Neuroma
Total Hearing Loss Right Ear
Assoc. w/ Right Side Acoustic
Neuroma,
Post
Craniotomy
0% x 1/Not Service Connected x 0
Combined: 80%*
6209-6100
Status
20%
10%
10%
8207
8510
6001
Exam
20030923
20030923
20030923
20030923
20030923
20030923
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓
Combined: 10%
*Separate 30% rating for headache added per VARD 20050107 effective 20031217.
ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Disability Evaluation System (DES) is responsible for maintaining a fit
and vital fighting force. While the DES considers all of the member's medical conditions,
compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short a member’s
career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of final disposition. The DES
has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity
or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation nor for conditions
determined to be service-connected by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) but not
determined to be unfitting by the PEB. However the DVA, operating under a different set of
laws (Title 38, United States Code), is empowered to compensate all service-connected
conditions and to periodically re-evaluate said conditions for the purpose of adjusting the
Veteran’s disability rating should the degree of impairment vary over time. The Board’s role is
confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB
rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on severity at the time of
separation. The Board has neither the jurisdiction nor authority to scrutinize or render opinions
in reference to the CI’s statements in the application regarding suspected DES improprieties in
the processing of his case.
Chronic Right Shoulder Pain Condition. The CI injured his right shoulder during training in July
2001 incurring an acromioclavicular (AC) joint separation and compression fracture of the
clavicle. The CI experienced persisting right shoulder pain due to AC joint degenerative arthritis
with impingement syndrome due to an AC joint osteophyte. The CI subsequently underwent
right shoulder surgery in March 2003 with resection of the distal end of the clavicle at the AC
joint. Following recovery from surgery, pain recurred with wearing his rucksack and when he
was detailed to picking up trash. He was unable to tolerate load bearing equipment, fire a rifle
due to impact on the shoulder, or perform push-ups due to his shoulder pain condition. The
MEB examination performed on 13 May 2003 was remarkable for tenderness of the right
shoulder over the mid to distal two-thirds of the right clavicle without deformity, redness or
warmth. Range-of-motion (ROM) was flexion to 160 degrees, abduction 160 degrees, internal
rotation 75 degrees and external rotation 75 degrees. Motor strength was normal. Deep
tendon reflexes were normal and symmetrical. There was decreased sensation in the right
upper extremity over ulnar hand, forearm and biceps considered a residual from surgery. On
the general VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination on 23 September 2003, 3 months
before separation, the musculoskeletal system examination was noted as unremarkable
without detail referring to the MEB examination; “see medical evaluation board and claimant’s
medical record for details of this problem and associated functional limitations.” As a residual
of the surgery it was noted that there was a mildly diminished sensation to simple touch and
sharp over the right upper extremity from the biceps area to the proximal forearm. Muscle
strength of both upper extremities was normal.
The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. There
was no ankylosis, limitation of movement, or instability to warrant a minimum compensable
rating under respective VASRD diagnostic codes (5200, 5201 5202). The condition correlated
with the 10% rating under 5202, impairment of clavicle or scapular malunion or non-union
without loose movement. Alternatively a 10% rating was supported for painful motion or
functional impairment with application of §4.59 or §4.40. The VA granted a 20% rating citing
loose movement and sensory loss; however the Board noted that the MEB examination did not
document loose movement, that strength was reported as normal, and sensory changes did not
interfere with duties. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of
VASRD §4.3 (Resolution of reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient
cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the right shoulder pain condition.
Contended PEB Conditions. The contended conditions adjudicated as not unfitting by the PEB
were total hearing loss, right ear s/p resection of acoustic neuroma, right facial paresis, s/p
resection of acoustic neuroma, neurotrophic keratitis right eye, post-surgical headaches, mild
intermittent positional vertigo, and mild nerve root dysfunction right upper extremity. The
Board’s first charge with respect to these conditions is an assessment of the appropriateness of
the PEB’s fitness adjudications. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is
higher than the VASRD §4.3 (Resolution of reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating
recommendations, but remains adherent to the DoDI 6040.44 “fair and equitable” standard.
During the MEB examination in November 2002, a marked right sided hearing loss was
detected leading to diagnosis of a right sided acoustic neuroma. MEB proceedings were
suspended pending evaluation and treatment. The CI underwent surgical removal of the right
sided acoustic neuroma on 5 February 2003 resulting in complete hearing loss in the right ear,
right cranial nerves VII and VIII injury with right facial paralysis, decreased sense of taste and
smell. The total hearing loss of the right ear resulted in an H2 profile which is non-disqualifying
for continued military service. The residual right facial paresis (paralysis and loss of sensation),
decreased sense of smell and taste also did not interfere with duty. The CI developed chronic
dry right eye with inflammation of the cornea secondary to incomplete closure of the right eye
lid (neurotrophic keratitis) and underwent eye lid surgery in June 2003 to enable full closure.
At the time of the MEB, his vision met retention standards and examination showed good eye
closure. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination, visual acuity was unchanged,
and examination of the cornea, lens, and retina was normal. The CI experienced worsening of
headaches following surgery. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) 31 July 2003 noted
intermittent headaches three times per day lasting up to an hour aggravated by wear of the
helmet or bending over. The headaches required restriction from Kevlar and head gear,
however the examiner noted the headaches were improving and expected to meet retention
standards. The C&P examination, September 2003, recorded a similar history for the headaches
without report of incapacitation. The commander’s letter reported excellent performance of
duties in an office setting. The majority of the Board concluded the evidence was not sufficient
to overcome the PEB not-unfit determination for the headache condition. The NARSUM noted
post-operative episodes of vertigo characterized as “mild intermittent positional vertigo
improving.” The condition did not require medications. The physician notes from the 13 May
2003 MEB history and physical examination notes headache without any mention of vertigo.
The otolaryngology NARSUM, dictated 21 May 2003 also makes no mention of vertigo. On
examination, there was no eye nystagmus to suggest a vestibular problem. At the time of the
C&P examination in September 2003, tests for balance and coordination were all normal.
Board members concluded the evidence was not sufficient to overcome the PEB not-unfit
determination for the vertigo condition. Following right shoulder surgery the CI experienced
decreased sensation of the right upper extremity ulnar hand/forearm and biceps without
weakness. Examinations documented intact strength reflexes. The decreased sensation did
not interfere with performance of duties. Board members concluded the evidence was not
sufficient to overcome the PEB not-unfit determination for the mild nerve root dysfunction
right upper extremity condition. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance
of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change
in the PEB fitness determinations for the any of the contended conditions; and, therefore, no
additional disability ratings can be recommended.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or
guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were
inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the right
shoulder pain condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no
change in the PEB adjudication. In the matter of the contended total hearing loss, right ear s/p
resection of acoustic neuroma, right facial paresis, s/p resection of acoustic neuroma,
neurotrophic keratitis right eye, mild
intermittent positional vertigo, mild nerve root
dysfunction right upper extremity conditions, the Board unanimously recommends no change
from the PEB determinations as not unfitting. In the matter of the contended post-surgical
headaches, the Board by a vote of 2:1 recommends no change from the PEB determination as
not unfitting. The single voter for dissent (who recommended unfit with a 0% rating did not
elect to submit a minority opinion. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of
review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of
the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:
VASRD CODE
5099-5003
RATING
RATING
10%
10%
UNFITTING CONDITION
Chronic Right Shoulder Pain
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20111024, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF
Director
Physical Disability Board of Review
SFMR-RB
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB / XXXXXXXXXX), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20130003090 (PD201101003)
I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of
Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the
subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a,
I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of
Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision
by mail.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00544
The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), determined unfit for Deafness in Left Ear with Tinnitus, and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force and Department of Defense regulations. At this time he no longer had any vertigo, incoordination, or headaches but continued to have tinnitus, absolute hearing loss in the left ear, and left facial nerve palsy. The 2008 PEB determined the CI was unfit...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02096
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Left shoulder arthrography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the left shoulderwere normal.A neurologic physical examination in January 2006 reported findings suggestive of thoracic outlet syndrome (upper...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00348
Nevertheless, given the CI’s history of starting college prior to separation, employment after separation, and normal performance on tests of “intellectual abilities, memory, executive control, language, and visual-spatial functioning,” the Board agreed that the CI’s level of functioning at separation best fit the VASRD §4.130 10% criteria, “occupational and social impairment due to mild or transient symptoms which decrease work efficiency and ability to perform occupational tasks only...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00021
Other Conditions . In the matter of the Bell’s Palsy and anomalous CN regeneration condition, the Board recommends by a vote of 2:1 a rating of 20% coded 8399-8307 (Neuritis CN VII as incomplete, severe) IAW VASRD §4.124a. In the matter of the Hypertension, Hypercholesterolemia, Herpetic Whitlow, Hip, Knee Shoulder and Wrist Pain, Neck Pain, Left Shoulder Pain, PRK, Rectal bleeding, Pain in Chest, Migraine Headaches and Allergic Rhinitis conditions or any other medical conditions eligible...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 02363
The PEB also adjudicated surgical scar of residual of amputation 5th ray, moderately disfiguring, persistent digital neuroma and loss of grip strength secondary to 5th ray resection as Category II (contributing to unfit) conditions. It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. In addition to rating the 5th digit...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00095
Despite the CI’s remarks of pain during portions of flexion of both knees, the VA C&P noted that examination of his knee on 10 June 2003 “ was grossly unremarkable” the examiner of on to state that the knee examination revealed “ no soft tissue swelling, no point tenderness, or joint effusion and there was no ligamentous instability appreciated.” After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded there was insufficient cause to recommend a...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00596
The PEB adjudicated the mild cognitive dysfunction condition as unfitting, rated 10%; with application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). A general C&P exam 10 months prior to separation, stated that in addition to his daily headaches and dizziness, the CI had experienced ten episodes of syncope over the past year, had not been able to work since the head injury, and had “significant functional impairment as he cannot concentrate,” although he was...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00251
Chronic Neck Pain Condition . Other PEB Conditions . Service Treatment Record
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00431
The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), found unfit for the condition, determined unfit for continued military service and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Navy and Department of Defense regulations. While chronic vertigo with associated ataxia was the condition for which the CI was initially placed on TDRL, further diagnostic work-up revealed that her symptoms were due to chronic B12...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01563
There were no other conditions on the MEB submission.The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the post-operative neuroma versus scar neuritis of the right medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve with loss of pronation conditions as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI appealed to the Formal PEB (FPEB), which affirmed the Informal PEB (IPEB)rating but changed the VASRD code.The CI also filed a petition for relief to...