RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: xxxxxxxxxx. BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army
CASE NUMBER: PD1100123 SEPARATION DATE: 20020901
BOARD DATE: 20111116
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSG/E-6 (92A/Logistical Specialist) medically separated for left knee pain with grade II chondromalacia of the medial femoral condyle (arthroscopy) and radiographs showing a narrow tibiofemoral joint consistent with osteoarthritis. The CI initially presented with left knee pain in October 1993 when he injured himself while playing soccer. After conservative management, he underwent an arthroscopic decompression of a meniscal cyst. The CI was diagnosed with grade II chondromalacia of the medial femoral condyle. Despite medication, surgery, physical therapy and the use of a cane, the CI was unable to perform within his military occupational specialty (MOS) or meet physical fitness standards. The CI was issued a permanent L4 profile and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The MEB forwarded “post traumatic osteoarthritis of the left knee” to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. The PEB adjudicated “left knee pain with grade II chondromalacia” condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and possible application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency pain policy and DoDI 1332.39. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 10% disability rating.
CI CONTENTION: “The rating that I received from the Department of the Army was 20% lower than the rating I received with the Department of Veteran Affairs. I believe that my disability rating with the Army should have been higher than what I received.” He elaborates no specific contentions regarding rating or coding and mentions no additionally contended conditions.
RATING COMPARISON:
Service IPEB – Dated 20020610 | VA (3 Mo. Pre-Separation) – All Effective Date 20020902 | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Condition | Code | Rating | Condition | Code | Rating | Exam |
L/Knee Pain w/Grade II Chondromalacia | 5010-5003 | 10% | Post operative Residuals Osteoarthritis of Left Knee | 5262-5010 | 10% | 20020625 |
↓No Additional MEB/PEB Entries↓ | Migraines | 8100 | 10% | 20020625 | ||
Exercise Induced Asthma | 6602 | 10% | 20020625 | |||
0% x 1/Not Service Connected x 0 | 20020625 | |||||
Combined: 10% | Combined: 30% |
______________________________________________________________________________
ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Disability Evaluation System (DES) is responsible for maintaining a fit and vital fighting force. While the DES considers all of the service member's medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short a service member’s career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of final disposition. However the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA), operating under a different set of laws (Title 38, United States Code), is empowered to compensate service connected conditions and to periodically re-evaluate said conditions for the purpose of adjusting the veteran’s disability rating should the degree of impairment vary over time.
Left Knee Condition. There were two goniometric range of motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation. These exams are summarized in the chart below.
Goniometric ROM – Left Knee |
MEB ~ 6 Mo. Pre-Sep | VA C&P ~ 3 Mo. Pre-Sep |
---|---|---|
Flexion (140 ⁰normal) | 120⁰ | 120⁰ |
Extension (0⁰ normal) | 0⁰ | 0⁰ |
Comment | Hx intermittent locking and give away; mild tenderness to palpation (TTP) anterolateral, patella; patella grinding, pain; no marked crepitus; stable to varus/valgus, Lachman's, anterior drawer and posterior drawer testing, patellar appears to tract normally; uses cane; “antalgic gait…with or without cane”; x-ray early osteoarthritis tibiofemoral joint space | Hx intermittent locking and give away and intermittent swelling; TTP joint line and behind patella; flexion decreased due to pain slight antalgic gait favoring left knee; positive patellar grinding; negative McMurray; “osteoarthritis, condition will deteriorate over time” |
§4.71a Rating | 20% (PEB 10%) | 20% (VA 10%) |
The CI injured his left knee playing soccer in October 1993 and developed chronic knee pain. The CI had two subsequent emergency room visits for the left knee pain. The CI underwent a left knee arthroscopy cyst removal and partial medial meniscectomy in July 1997. The CI underwent several courses of physical therapy. A magnetic resonance imaging in March 2001 indicated a strain of the posterolateral corner of the knee without a distinct tear. X-ray found a narrow tibiofemoral joint space consistent with early osteoarthritis, and bone scan demonstrated a mild diffuse stress reaction in the left knee medial compartment.
The commander’s statement noted that the CI had severe leg pains and he was unable to perform many of the physical tasks inherent to his MOS. The MEB exam six months prior to separation documented persistent severe knee pain causing a lack of sleep, inability to stand/walk for a prolonged period, pain on knee bending, locking, give away, swelling, grinding, use of a cane for ambulation, and loss of full ROM. The VA compensation and pension (C&P) exam, three months prior to separation, documented a history of constant knee pain ranging from 3/10 to 8/10, with walking, standing, running or stair climbing; intermittent locking, giveaway and swelling. Key findings were an antalgic gait, pain-limited ROM and a negative McMurray exam for meniscal tear. The examiner further noted that the CI had osteoarthritis and this condition would “deteriorate over time.”
The PEB coded the left knee pain with grade II chondromalacia 5010-5003 (arthritis due to trauma, analogized to arthritis, degenerative [hypertrophic or osteoarthritis]) rated at 10%. The VA coded the post-operative residuals osteoarthritis of left knee 5262-5010 (tibia and fibula, impairment of with slight knee or ankle disability, analogized to arthritis due to trauma) rated at 10%. The PEB and the VA chose different coding options, but this did not bear on rating. Both exams documented history of give away, locking, and swelling and pain with objective antalgic gait. At the MEB exam, the CI required the use of a cane for ambulation. The CI had partial medial meniscectomy and symptoms of swelling and give-way, in addition to pain limited ROM. The Board considered dual rating the knee with coding of 5010-5003 at 10% and the addition of 5099-5259 cartilage, semilunar, removal of, symptomatic at 10%. However, coding all of the CI’s knee pathology and disability under 5010-5262 (tibia and fibula, impairment of) with moderate knee disability rated at 20% appeared predominate. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a separation rating of 20% coded as 5010-5262 for the left knee pain with grade II chondromalacia and history of meniscal repair condition.
Remaining Conditions. Other conditions identified in the DES file were anemia, beta thalassemia and inguinal hernia repair, right knee pain, chronic low back pain, asthma (VA 10%), hearing loss right ear, insomnia, leg cramps, chest pain and frequent severe headaches (VA 10%). Several additional non-acute conditions or medical complaints were also documented. None of these conditions were significantly clinically or occupationally active during the MEB period. The unilateral sensorineural hearing loss carried a permanent H2 profile; however, none of the other conditions carried attached profiles and none of the conditions were implicated in the commander’s statement. These conditions were reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. The Board considered if any right knee pain limitations were overshadowed by the unfitting left knee condition but there was scant evidence in the record for complaints or treatment of the right knee. It was determined that none of the conditions could be argued as unfitting and subject to separation rating.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the left knee pain with grade II chondromalacia condition, the Board unanimously recommends a rating of 20% coded 5010-5262 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the frequent severe headaches, asthma, anemia, beta thalassemia, inguinal hernia repair, right knee pain, chronic low back pain, hearing loss right ear, insomnia, leg cramps, and chest pain, or any other medical conditions eligible for Board consideration, the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend any findings of unfit for additional rating at separation.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:
UNFITTING CONDITION | VASRD CODE | RATING |
---|---|---|
Left Knee Pain w/Grade II Chondromalacia w/History of Meniscal Surgery | 5010-5262 | 20% |
COMBINED | 20% |
______________________________________________________________________________
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20110323, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
..~
SFMR-RB
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
ARMY REVIEW BOARDS AGENCY
1901 SOUTH BELL STREET 2ND FLOOR
ARLINGTON, VA 22202-4508
05 DEC 2011
MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB I 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202
SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for AR20110023312 (PD201100123)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of
Review (000 PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the
subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a,
I accept the Board's recommendation to modify the individual's disability rating to 20%
without recharacterization of the individual's separation. This decision is final.
2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.
3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided
to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have
shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this
memorandum without enclosures.
BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:
Encl
CF:
( ) 000 PDBR
( ) OVA
Deputy Assistant Secretary
(Army Review Boards)
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01562
Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Knee Pain5099-50030%Degenerative Changes Left Knee5260-501010%20040915Other x 0 (Not in Scope) Combined: 0%Combined: 20% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20041230(most proximate to date of separation (DOS)) Left Knee Pain with Chondromalacia Grade 1/2 Condition . At the MEB exam, 6 months prior to separation, the CI reported continuing left knee pain and recurrent episodes of locking. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00229
The single voter for dissent (who recommended a separate left knee 20% and right knee 10% rating)submitted the appended minority opinion.In the matter of the contended asthma, LBP and OSA conditions, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the determinations as not unfitting.There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration. The AO therefore recommends that each joint be separately rated as follows: an unfitting left knee condition coded 5010-5258...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01882
The right knee condition, characterized by the MEB as “tricompartmental chondromalacia of the right knee,” “lateral meniscus tear” and “left knee neuroma” (Board believes this to be an error and should have been right knee), were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The Informal PEB adjudicated “tricompartmental chondromalacia of the right knee” as unfitting, rated at 10%, with likely application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00143
Osteoarthritis and Chondromalacia of Both Knees .The PEB combined the right and left knee conditions under a single Service disability rating, coded 5003. If the members judge that separately ratable conditions are justified by performance based fitness criteria and indicated IAW VASRD §4.7 (higher of two evaluations), separate ratings are recommended; with the stipulation that the result may not be lower than the overall combined rating from the PEB. Physical Disability Board of Review
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01933
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to DVA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. The examination on 5March 2009 (5 years after separation) showed...
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00832
The FPEB and VA each coded the individual knees at 10% using the criteria for arthritis (5003), with the VA indicating a traumatic onset by using code 5010. Left Knee : With regards to the left knee, the Board considered that the preponderance of the record supported the 10% rating for the left knee for limited motion. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00494
Flexion (140⁰ normal)“approximately 0 to 125⁰”100⁰110⁰Extension (0⁰ normal)0⁰0⁰CommentVarus deformity, palpable femoral osteophytes, scar, crepitus, TTP, no instability (including Lachman’s), neg McMurray’s, mildly pos patellar grind3+ effusion, TTP (medial joint line & lat epicondyle), 30 ml normal joint fluid aspirated, steroid injected; Hx incr pain & effusion due to moving over last 2-3 wks, no lockingPainful motion, crepitus, scar nontender, no instability (including Lachman’s), neg...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01830
The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RATING COMPARISON : IPEB – Dated 20051129VA*~1 Month Pre-SeparationConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Knee Pain50030%Osteoarthritis & Chondromalacia,Left Knee5010- 526010%20051228Other x 0 (Not In...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00688
The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB rated the knee condition as 5099‐5003 at 10% for pain “rated as slight /constant.” The VA rated 10% under 5010 for painful motion and tenderness. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record SFMR‐RB XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF President Physical Disability Board of Review MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency (TAPD‐ZB / XXXXXXXXX), 2900...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00344
SEPARATION DATE: 20060405 Left Knee Condition . By the time of separation, the CI’s condition had improved such that he had a full ROM, albeit that knee pain persisted in spite of treatment.