Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01830
Original file (PD-2013-01830.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2013-01830
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20150326
SEPARATION DATE: 20060210


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty E-6 (Unit Supply Specialist) medically separated for left knee pain. The left knee condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). “Osteoarthritis of the left knee with diffuse chondromalacia” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic left knee pain” as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) . The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “When I received my rating my paperwork went to Walter Reed and came back in ‘two days’ with a rating of 0%. The VA gave me rating of 10% during my medical out processing with them. The explanation was that knees only were priority at 0% to 10%, and they gave me the lowest possible rating.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. Any conditions outside the Board’s defined scope of review and any contention not requested in this application may remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military/Naval Records. Furthermore, the Board’s authority is limited to assessing the fairness and accuracy of PEB rating determinations and recommending corrections, where appropriate. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board has neither the role nor the authority to compensate for post-separation progression or complications of service-connected conditions. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board gives consideration to VA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation.


 RATING COMPARISON :

IPEB – Dated 20051129
 VA* ~1 Month Pre-Separation
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Left Knee Pain 5003 0% Osteoarthritis & Chondromalacia,
Left Knee		 5010-
5260		 10% 20051228
Other x 0 (Not In Scope)
 Other x 1
RATING: 0%
 RATING: 10%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 60726 (most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] ) .

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Chronic Left Knee Pain. The narrative summary notes the CI had a history of knee pain following a twisting injury and aggravated it 3 years later in November 2002 while walking. Magnetic resonance imaging on 30 August 2002 noted medial and lateral meniscus tears, sprain of the medical collateral ligament, chondromalacia of the medial femoral condyle, and a ganglion cyst near the posterior cruciate ligament. Surgery was recommended but the CI was preparing for deployment. Following his return from deployment the CI reported worsening knee pain and X-rays showed osteoarthritis. An orthopedic evaluation on 4 April 2005 noted tenderness along the medial joint line and positive testing for meniscal injury (McMurray’s), without instability and recommended surgery. Arthroscopy on 14 April 2005 was performed with repair of medial and lateral meniscus tears, debridement, and repair of Grade III-IV chondromalacia of the knee and Grade II of the patella. Following the surgery the CI continued to report knee pain and an MEB was initiated.

At the MEB examination on 18 August 2005, 6 months prior to separation, the CI reported knee pain, aggravated by activity, and swelling after prolonged walking. The MEB physical exam noted joint line tenderness without effusion. There was pain with patellar compression and McMurray’s maneuver. Knee range-of-motion was 0-120 degrees (normal 0-140). Lower extremity strength and sensation were normal. The DD Form 2808, Report of Medical Examination performed the same day, noted swelling and pain with flexion greater than 45 degrees.

At the VA Compensation and Pension examination on 28 December 2005, a month prior to separation, the CI reported knee pain. The exam noted a normal gait. Knee ROM was full with pain at 130 degrees of flexion. There was a mildly positive McMurray’s sign and no evidence of instability.

The Board directed its attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the knee condition 0%, coded 5003 (degenerative arthritis) and the VA rated it 10%, coded 5010-5260 (limited flexion with traumatic arthritis). The evidence in record supports a 10% rating coded with any of multiple §4.71a codes-5503 for painful limited motion of a single joint with imaging evidence of degenerative arthritis; 5260 IAW VASRD 4.59 (painful motion); or 5259 for symptomatic semilunar cartilage. The Board reviewed to see if a higher evaluation was achieved with any coding approach. There was no evidence of ankylosis; instability or dislocation; frequent “locking”, joint pain and effusion into the joint; impairment of the tibia/fibula or femur; or sufficient limitation of ROM to provide higher or additional rating of the knee. Members agreed that the disability due to the knee condition did not meet rating criteria for a rating higher than 10% with any applicable code and chose to code as 5003. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the left knee condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the left knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5003 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Left Knee Osteoarthritis 5003 10%
RATING 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20131024, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans Affairs Treatment Record






XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
DoD Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150011066 (PD201301830)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                    Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                    (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01562

    Original file (PD-2013-01562.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pre-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Left Knee Pain5099-50030%Degenerative Changes Left Knee5260-501010%20040915Other x 0 (Not in Scope) Combined: 0%Combined: 20% *Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD)dated 20041230(most proximate to date of separation (DOS)) Left Knee Pain with Chondromalacia Grade 1/2 Condition . At the MEB exam, 6 months prior to separation, the CI reported continuing left knee pain and recurrent episodes of locking. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01933

    Original file (PD-2013-01933.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to DVA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. The examination on 5March 2009 (5 years after separation) showed...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01061

    Original file (PD2011-01061.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FPEB convened 26 April 2007 and after reviewing newly provided medical documents, adjudicated the right knee chondromalacia osteoarthritis of the medial compartment as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). In January 2005 surgical arthroscopy was performed on the knee revealing right knee chondromalacia of the patella with lateral patellar mal-tracking and chondromalacia of the medial femoral condyle and lateral tibial...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00096

    Original file (PD 2014 00096.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition, characterized as “chondromalacia of patella,” “tear of medial cartilage or meniscus of knee,” “pain in joint involving lower leg” and “unspecified orthopedic aftercare” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. Post-SepFlexion (140 Normal)115105Extension (0 Normal)-0Commentantalgic gait; crepitus;painful motion; antalgic gait§4.71a Rating10%10%The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01745

    Original file (PD-2014-01745.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Hyperlipidemia was submitted by the MEB as medically acceptable.The Informal PEBadjudicated “right knee pain” as unfitting at 10%, and “left knee pain” as unfitting at 10%, with likely application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). On PE of the knees, the left knee was normal in appearance. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02188

    Original file (PD-2013-02188.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left Knee Condition . Post-SepFlexion (140 Normal)13014095Extension (0 Normal)00-10CommentMild effusion; left thigh atrophy; neg lachman and posterior drawer; no valgus or varus instability; crepitus notedOccasional use of an assistive device.Painful motion noted; Four months post-operative from post separation surgery.§4.71a Rating10%10%10%The Board directed attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The VA and PEB both rated the knee at 10% based on examinations...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01935

    Original file (PD 2012 01935.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The rating for the unfitting chronic left knee pain condition is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Chronic Left Knee Pain Condition . invalid font number 31502 SAMR-RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency (AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20140020828 (PD201201935) 1.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00504

    Original file (PD2011-00504.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was rated on one knee condition at 10%. Both knees R and L have laxity was not rated on both conditions. In the matter of the right and left knee condition (anterior patellofemoral pain), the Board unanimously recommends a separate disability rating of 10% for each knee, coded 5299-5260 IAW VASRD §4.71a.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01771

    Original file (PD-2014-01771.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There was pain during evaluation of ROM and stress of the meniscus. The post separation MRI did not report any abnormality of the PCL and orthopedic examination and arthroscopy did not show any abnormality of the PCL.The Board noted the VA C&P examination report of moderate laxity of the medial collateral ligament upon which the VA based its 20% rating under VASRD code 5257. All Board members agreed that the examinations summarized above reported sufficient evidence of painful motion and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00776

    Original file (PD2012-00776.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44 (Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the...