Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01562
Original file (PD-2013-01562.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX    CASE: PD-2013-01562
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20141022
SEPARATION DATE: 20041221


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (92F/Petroleum Supply Specialist) medically separated for left knee pain. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). “Left knee pain secondary to meniscal tear and chondromalacia grade 1/2” conditions, characterized as medically acceptable, were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other condition was submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “left knee pain” which included chondromalacia as unfitting rated 0% with likely reliance on AR 635-40, B29 citing “as analogous to arthritis of one major joint.”


CI CONTENTION: “BASED ON THE WOUNDED WARRIOR ACT JANUARY 28 2008.” [sic]


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting left knee pain condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any condition or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040826
 VA* - (3 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Left Knee Pain 5099-5003 0% Degenerative Changes Left Knee 5260-5010 10% 20040915
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 20%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 20041230 (most proximate to date of separation ( DOS ) )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Left Knee Pain with Chondromalacia Grade 1/2 Condition. The narrative summary noted an initial left knee injury during basic training in 2001 with swelling and intermittent locking symptoms. He continued training with increasing left knee pain that was not responsive to conservative therapy. Imaging (magnetic resonance imaging and plain films) demonstrated a lateral meniscus tear and tibial plateau chondromalacia. Surgery was recommended, but reasonably declined. Treatment notes from 2002 through April 2004 had sporadically documented full range-of-motion (“FROM”), without evidence of formal goniometric ROM testing or consideration of repetitive motion.

At the MEB exam, 6 months prior to separation, the CI reported continuing left knee pain and recurrent episodes of locking. The MEB physical exam noted the CI wearing a brace, an antalgic gait and having moderate swelling of the knee. There was an effusion and a positive McMurray’s test (for meniscal tear) and patellar apprehension. There was no instability and neurovascular exam was normal with no muscle atrophy noted. Goniometric ROM performed the same day indicated an ROM of 0-112 degrees (normal 0-140) with pain on motion. The diagnoses were meniscal tear and chondromalacia of the left knee.

At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed 3 months prior to separation, the CI reported similar history and symptoms. Exam documented a normal gait with ROM of 0-60 degrees including DeLuca criteria with repetition (normal 0-140). There was positive crepitus and McMurray’s test. A second VA C&P exam performed 7 months after separation noted continued use of a brace, significant tenderness and pain on manipulation or motion. ROM was 0-100 degrees and there was no laxity or effusion noted.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the knee at 0% noting the meniscal tear and chondromalacia and specifying normal ROM without joint laxity. Coding was coded analogous to 5003 [arthritis, degenerative (hypertrophic or osteoarthritis)]. All formal ROM evaluations in evidence documented painful motion and the Board considered that the PEB may have applied AR 635-40, B29 for rating. The VA rated the knee at 10% coded 5260-5010 (leg limitation of flexion - arthritis, due to trauma, substantiated by X-ray findings). All formal exams in evidence proximate to separation documented painful motion below the level for separate compensation under the specific knee flexion or extension ratings. There was no objective evidence of knee recurrent subluxation or lateral instability and history was consistent with “locking” due to meniscal tear. The Board therefore considered coding analogously to codes 5258 or 5259 for the semilunar cartilage. The Board adjudged that the record did not sufficiently support “frequent episodes of ‘locking,’ pain, and effusion into the joint” to warrant a 20% rating under the criteria of 5258. Although coding analogous to 5259 at 10% was supportable, this rating includes painful motion, and did not offer any benefit to coding as 5260-5010 at 10% with application of VASRD §4.59 (painful motion). After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the left knee condition coded 5260-5010.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on AR 635-40, B29 for rating the left knee was likely operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that regulation by the Board. In the matter of the left knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 5260-5010 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Left Knee Pain 5260-5010 10%
COMBINED 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130924, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record







XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review
SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20150007002 (PD201301562)


1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                       XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                           Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                           (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00093

    Original file (PD-2014-00093.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00229

    Original file (PD2012 00229.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The single voter for dissent (who recommended a separate left knee 20% and right knee 10% rating)submitted the appended minority opinion.In the matter of the contended asthma, LBP and OSA conditions, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the determinations as not unfitting.There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration. The AO therefore recommends that each joint be separately rated as follows: an unfitting left knee condition coded 5010-5258...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00096

    Original file (PD 2014 00096.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The left knee condition, characterized as “chondromalacia of patella,” “tear of medial cartilage or meniscus of knee,” “pain in joint involving lower leg” and “unspecified orthopedic aftercare” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. Post-SepFlexion (140 Normal)115105Extension (0 Normal)-0Commentantalgic gait; crepitus;painful motion; antalgic gait§4.71a Rating10%10%The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01830

    Original file (PD-2013-01830.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RATING COMPARISON : IPEB – Dated 20051129VA*~1 Month Pre-SeparationConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Left Knee Pain50030%Osteoarthritis & Chondromalacia,Left Knee5010- 526010%20051228Other x 0 (Not In...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00688

    Original file (PD2012-00688.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB rated the knee condition as 5099‐5003 at 10% for pain “rated as slight /constant.” The VA rated 10% under 5010 for painful motion and tenderness. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record SFMR‐RB XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF President Physical Disability Board of Review MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency (TAPD‐ZB / XXXXXXXXX), 2900...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02188

    Original file (PD-2013-02188.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Left Knee Condition . Post-SepFlexion (140 Normal)13014095Extension (0 Normal)00-10CommentMild effusion; left thigh atrophy; neg lachman and posterior drawer; no valgus or varus instability; crepitus notedOccasional use of an assistive device.Painful motion noted; Four months post-operative from post separation surgery.§4.71a Rating10%10%10%The Board directed attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The VA and PEB both rated the knee at 10% based on examinations...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00139

    Original file (PD-2014-00139.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. His left knee pain continued following his surgeries. The DD Form 2808, dated the day of the NARSUM addendum (and by the same examiner), documented tenderness to palpation, no effusion, no crepitus or grinding and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01882

    Original file (PD 2014 01882.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The right knee condition, characterized by the MEB as “tricompartmental chondromalacia of the right knee,” “lateral meniscus tear” and “left knee neuroma” (Board believes this to be an error and should have been right knee), were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The Informal PEB adjudicated “tricompartmental chondromalacia of the right knee” as unfitting, rated at 10%, with likely application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00832

    Original file (PD2011-00832.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FPEB and VA each coded the individual knees at 10% using the criteria for arthritis (5003), with the VA indicating a traumatic onset by using code 5010. Left Knee : With regards to the left knee, the Board considered that the preponderance of the record supported the 10% rating for the left knee for limited motion. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01933

    Original file (PD-2013-01933.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board gives consideration to DVA evidence, particularly within 12 months of separation, but only to the extent that it reasonably reflects the severity of the disability at the time of separation. The examination on 5March 2009 (5 years after separation) showed...