Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00703
Original file (PD2009-00703.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: Marine corps

CASE NUMBER: PD0900703 SEPARATION DATE: 20070515

BOARD DATE: 20110510

______________________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Sgt/E-5 (0411, Maintenance Technician), medically separated from the Marine Corps. The medical basis for the separation was Herniated Intervertebral Disk Cervical Spine, C2-3 and C3-4, Status Post (S/P) Right C4 Facetectomy with Debridement of C3-C4 Herniated Disk and postoperative wound infection. He did not respond adequately to rehabilitation and treatment and was unable to perform within his Military Occupational Specialty or to participate in a physical fitness test. He was placed on Limited Duty (LIMDU) and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Herniated intervertebral disk cervical spine, C2-3 and C3-4, S/P right C4 facetectomy with debridement of C3-C4 herniated disk was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E. No other conditions appeared on the MEB’s submission. Other conditions included in the narrative summary and Disability Evaluation system (DES) packet will be discussed below. The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated the herniated intervertebral disk cervical spine, C2-3 and C3-4, S/P right C4 facetectomy with debridement of C3-C4 herniated disk as unfitting, rated 20%; with application of the SECNAVINST 1850.4E. The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 20% disability rating.

______________________________________________________________________________

CI CONTENTION: “Discrepancy between DoD and VA ratings. DoD 20%, VA 30% for same injury.” He additionally lists all of his VA conditions and ratings as per the rating chart below. A contention for their inclusion in the separation rating is, therefore, implied.

______________________________________________________________________________

RATING COMPARISON:

Service IPEB – Dated 20070305 VA (6 Mo. After Separation) – All Effective Date 20070516
Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
DDD C2-3, C3-4, s/p R C4 facetectomy w/debridement of C3-4 herniated disk 5237 20% Post op cervical laminectomy 5299-5237 10% 20071126
Scar s/p cervical laminectomy 7800 10% 20071126
↓No Additional MEB Entries↓ R cervical radiculopathy 8515 10% 20071126
0% X 2 / Not Service Connected X 2 20071126
Final Combined: 20% Total Combined: 30%

______________________________________________________________________________

ANALYSIS SUMMARY: While the DES considers all of the service member's medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those medical conditions that cut short a service member's career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of final disposition. However, the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws (Title 38, United States Code), is empowered to assign ratings for conditions that were not separately unfitting at separation and periodically re-evaluate veterans for the purpose of adjusting the disability rating should his degree of impairment vary over time.

Cervical spine condition: An EMG, 8 March 2006, showed electrophysiologic evidence for a mild, chronic right cervical radiculopathy predominately in the C6 nerve root distribution without evidence of ongoing denervation. MRI of his cervical spine, 30 March 2006, revealed right paracentral disk protrusions at C2-3 and C3-4. He underwent a right C3-4 medial facetectomy and decompression of the C4 nerve on 27 July 2006 without relief. There were two goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation. Both of these exams are summarized in the chart below. The MEB examination was closer to the time of separation, therefore, was considered to be of higher probative value; however, both exams result in the same rating based upon range of motion.

Cervical Spine Separation Date: 20070515
Goniometric ROM – Cervical

MEB - 3 Mo. Pre-Sep

20070208

VA C&P - 6 Mo. After-Sep

20071126

Flex (0-45 normal) 45⁰ 45⁰
Ext (0-45 normal) 35⁰ 30⁰
R Lat Flex (0-45 normal) 45⁰ 40⁰
L Lat Flex (0-45 normal) 35⁰ 40⁰
R Rotation (0-80 normal) 80⁰ 80⁰
L Rotation (0-80 normal) 80⁰ 80⁰
COMBINED (340 normal) 320⁰ 315⁰
§4.71a Rating 10%* 10%

*PEB granted 10% more for wound infection

The PEB examination documented ROM findings consistent with a 10% rating. The PEB notes indicated that an additional 10% was assigned due to his significant post-operative infection, for a 20% total rating. The VA rated 10% based upon range of motion. The VA additionally rated the surgical scar at 10% and the radiculopathy at 10%. Cervical radiculopathy was documented in this case. Board precedent is that a functional impairment tied to fitness is required to support a recommendation for addition of a peripheral nerve rating at separation. There was no functional impairment separately unfitting from the surgical scar or the radiculopathy secondary to the degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine. Thus the Board cannot support a recommendation for additional rating based on the scar or peripheral nerve impairment. Both the MEB/PEB and the VA examinations support a 10% rating for the only unfitting condition; however, by precedent the Board does not revoke ratings granted by the PEB and will not revoke the additional 10% granted for wound infection. In the matter of the cervical spine condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication.

Remaining Conditions: Other conditions identified in the Disability Evaluation System (DES) file were residual surgical scar post operative cervical laminectomy, right elbow pain, right foot pain, gastroesophageal reflux, obesity, poor sleep, asthma, right ear low frequency hearing loss, and impaired fasting glucose. None of these conditions were clinically active during the MEB period; none carried attached profiles; and, none were implicated in the Non Medical Assessment. These conditions were reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. It was determined that none could be argued as unfitting and subject to separation rating. Additionally, tinnitus was noted in the VA rating decision proximal to separation, but was not documented in the DES file. The Board does not have the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating recommendations for any condition not considered by the DES.

______________________________________________________________________________

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. In the matter of the herniated intervertebral disk cervical spine, C2-3 and C3-4, status post right C4 facetectomy with debridement of C3-C4 herniated disk condition the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication as not unfitting. In the matter of the right shoulder radiculopathy, to include right shoulder, right arm and right hand condition; the residual, surgical scar post operative cervical laminectomy condition: or any other medical conditions eligible for Board consideration, the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend any findings of unfit for additional rating at separation.

______________________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Degenerative Disc Disease -Cervical Spine 5237 20%
COMBINED 20%

______________________________________________________________________________

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20091126, w/atchs.

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.

Deputy Director

Physical Disability Board of Review

MEMORANDUM FOR DIRECTOR, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW

BOARDS

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR) RECOMMENDATION

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44

(b) PDBR ltr dtd 23 May 11

I have reviewed the subject case pursuant to reference (a) and, for the reasons set forth in reference (b), approve the recommendation of the PDBR xxxxxxxxx records not be corrected to reflect a change in either his characterization of separation or in the disability rating previously assigned by the Department of the Navy’s Physical Evaluation Board.

Assistant General Counsel

(Manpower & Reserve Affairs)

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00206

    Original file (PD-2014-00206.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20071129VA -Based on Service Treatment Records(STR)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Congenital Malformation523820%*Cervical Spondylosis w/DDD and Findings of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00193

    Original file (PD2011-00193.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the cervical herniated nucleus pulposus associated with intermittent pain despite no nerve impingement condition unfitting rated at 10% with application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). All evidence considered there is not reasonable doubt in the CI’s favor supporting addition of the right upper extremity radiculopathy condition as an unfitting condition for separation rating. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01535

    Original file (PD-2013-01535.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and when specifically requested by the CI, those conditions identified by the PEB, but determined to be not unfitting. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. After due deliberation in consideration of the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00166

    Original file (PD2013 00166.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI was then medically separated. Both the PEB and the VA coded the chronic neck pain condition 5241 for spinal fusion. The presence of functional impairment with a direct impact on fitness is the key determinant in the Board’s decision to recommend any condition for rating as additionally unfitting.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01637

    Original file (PD 2012 01637.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The InformalPEBadjudicated “C4-5 herniated nucleus pulposus and C6-C7 bulge with early myelopathy, status post foraminotomy, Aug 2000,” as unfitting, rated at 10%,with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI non-concurred with the IPEB findings/recommendations, and requested Formal PEB (FPEB), who re-adjudicated the CI’s neck condition increasing the rating from 10% to 20%.The CI non-concurred with the FPEB findings/recommendations further appealed to the Air...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00403

    Original file (PD2009-00403.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA rated his shoulder as a separate condition as described below. Right Shoulder Pain/Impingement: The VA examination on 20081105 documented Pain to palpation of the right shoulder, painful motion of right shoulder, and crepitation in right shoulder.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00419

    Original file (PD2009-00419.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The CI had symptoms of myelopathy in all four extremities. At this time the CI had symptoms of right upper extremity radiculopathy. The diagnoses in his finding of unfitness were cervical spondylotic myelopathy status post spinal fusion C3-6, rather than cervical spondylosis status post spinal fusion, VASRD code 5241, rated at 20%; right (dominant) upper extremity motor and sensory radiculopathy associated with cervical spondylotic myelopathy status post spinal fusion C3-6, VASRD code...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00409

    Original file (PD2011-00409.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Flex (0-45)No goniometrics45° (50°, 52°, 56°)35⁰*Ext (0-45)No goniometrics45° (50°, 50°, 52°)45⁰R Lat Flex (0-45)No goniometrics35° (35°, 40°, 45°)40⁰*L Lat Flex (0-45)No goniometrics35° (35°, 40°, 45°)40⁰*R Rotation (0-80)No goniometrics50° (52°, 54°, 56°)80⁰L Rotation (0-80)No goniometrics50° (52°, 54°, 56°)60⁰*COMBINED (340)260⁰300⁰C-spine MRI- degenerative disc disease, osteoarthropathyTenderness centrally C3-7; Mild paraspinal tenderness; sharp pain with lateral left bending; Mild pain...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00800

    Original file (PD2011-00800.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated the cervical spondylosis with neck pain and chronic mild left arm conditions as unfitting, rated at 20% for mild, incomplete paralysis. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was performed in 2002 and although the radiologist’s report is not present in the record, both the original MEB NARSUM in May 2002 and the updated MEB NARSUM in December 2002 noted this test documented diffuse spondylitic changes from C3-4 to C6-7, severe spinal stenosis at C5-6, moderate spinal stenosis...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01750

    Original file (PD2012 01750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA assigned a40% rating for the back condition rated 5292-5293 citing severe limitation of motion of the lumbar spine. The discussed the C&P examination report that the CI held on a chair and compared that examination with prior examinations and concluded the examination confirmed characteristic pain on motion but did not evidence muscle spasm.The Board also considered if additional disability rating was justified for peripheral nerve impairment due to radiculopathy.Although there was...