Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00170
Original file (PD2009-00170.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: MARINE CORPS

CASE NUMBER: PD0900170 BOARD DATE: 20100811

SEPARATION DATE: 20030315

________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY OF CASE: This covered individual (CI) was an active duty Staff Sergeant (0369, Infantry SNCO) medically separated from the Marine Corps in 2003 after more than 17 years of service. The medical basis for the separation was Heat Injury. He was not able to perform all the required duties of his military occupational specialty (MOS) or participate in the Physical Fitness Test (PFT), and underwent a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). His case was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) and the PEB determined he was unfit for continued Naval service due to his three serious heat injuries. He was then separated with a disability rating of 0% determined by the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Naval and Department of Defense regulations.

________________________________________________________________

CI CONTENTION: The CI states: ‘I was discharged for Heatstroke/Seizures. I received a 0% rating and found unfit for duty. I served 18 years in the military and felt that they should have let me complete the last two years to retire. I feel that the 0% rating should have been higher. I had marine in my unit who served less then seven years getting 30% retirement for a knee injury. I feel that my condition was more life treating. The code that they place on my PEB was for thyroids. From my understanding they did not have a way to rate an heatstroke or seizure. (Heat injuries x3, least two qualify as heatstroke (9920) VA diagnostic code 7999-7900). The heat injury was to cause for finding me unfit for duty. They also listed that the disability my be permanent. Which I have had other episodes over the past few years. I have been reading articles where military members are being kept on duty with missing limbs. I feel that I was unjust in giving a chance to retire with full benefits. I have been told not to drive by my doctor at the VA due to my condition and I have also been give Levetiracetam 500 MG tablets to help with the seizures.’

________________________________________________________________


RATING COMPARISON:

Service IPEB – Dated 20021029 VA (4 Months Prior to Separation) – All Effective 20030316
Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Heat Injuries X 3 Least Two Qualify as Heatstroke 7999-7900 0% Residuals, Status Post Heatstroke X Three 8911 0% 20021118
Status Post C5/6, C6/7 Discectomies with Fusion Category III: Conditions that are not separately unfitting and do not contribute to the unfitting condition(s) Residuals, Postoperative Cervical Discectomy and Fusion at C5-C6 and C6-C7, Cervical Disc Disease with Radiculopathy (Claimed as Neck Condition) 5293-5290 10% 20021118
MEB H&P Residuals, Lumbar Spine Strain 5292 10% 20021118
Not in DES Residuals, Right Shoulder Strain 5203 10% 20021118
Not in DES Residuals, Left Shoulder Strain 5203 10% 20021118
Not in DES Residuals, Left Ankle Sprain 5271 10% 20021118
MEB H&P Right, Patellofemoral Syndrome 5299-5019 10% 20011118
MEB H&P Residuals, Right Little Finger Sprain 5230 0% 20011118
MEB H&P Residuals, Left Little Finger Sprain 5230 0% 20011118
Not in DES Left, Middle Finger Fracture 5229 0% 20011118
Not in DES Right, Foot Bunion with Hallux Valgus at the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint 5280 0% 20011118
Not In DES Left, Foot Bunion with Hallux Valgus at the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint 5280 0% 20011118
TOTAL Combined: 0% TOTAL Combined (Includes Non-PEB Conditions): 50%

________________________________________________________________

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

The Navy MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) was unavailable for review. Neither the Navy nor the CI was able to provide a copy. However, other Disability Evaluation System (DES) documents were available as well as multiple service treatment record (STR) progress notes and the hospital discharge summary from July 2000. VA rating decisions, Compensation and Pension (C&P) exams, and treatment records were also available.

Heat Stroke

The CI had three episodes of heat injury (July 2000, April 2001, and April 2002) and at least two were designated as Heat Stroke. The first two episodes included loss of consciousness and convulsions in July 2000 and April 2001 and the CI was evaluated by neurology. In July 2000 the CI’s Corpsman witnessed him collapse and develop generalized tonic clonic movements of all extremities which lasted for approximately two minutes. The CI appeared confused and had a headache after he regained consciousness. He had been hiking in full gear in 90-95 degree heat at Camp Lejeune, NC. He had previously been exercising in similar heat for the previous one to two weeks without any difficulties. This heat injury, more likely than not, caused the CI to be more susceptible to heat injuries in the future. He had two more incidents while on active duty and had heat intolerance after he separated from service. He was limited in his outdoor activities to include yard work and playing with his children. He was limited to approximately 25 to 30 minutes maximum before he would begin to feel dizzy and overheated. He also noted that he would overheat easily doing general tasks around the house. There is no evidence of any cardiac, neurologic or cognitive residual problems related to heat injury. There is no also evidence of liver or kidney problems related to heat injury.

As part of the cardiac work-up a treadmill stress test was done 20010820 and the results were normal. The CI achieved 12.9 METs and exercised for 9 minutes and 55 seconds. He also had a normal echocardiogram, electroencephalogram (EEG), head CT scan, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well as multiple normal neurologic and mental status examinations. No abnormal hepatic or renal blood tests were in evidence. Multiple examinations and tests performed by the VA before and after separation from service also failed to show any residual problems due to heat injury except for heat intolerance. He did develop a seizure disorder five years after he separated from service. A VA C&P examiner determined this condition was due to an aneurysm, not to his history of heat strokes.

The Navy PEB determined the CI was unfit for continued Naval service due to the three heat injuries and resultant heat intolerance and inability to engage in strenuous activities in the field or deployed environments. There is no VASRD code for heat exhaustion and the PEB rated this condition analogous to 7900 Hyperthyroidism. This analogous code is included in the Army Physical Disability Agency’s list of analogous codes and is used to rate this condition. The VA used 8911 Epilepsy, petit mal to rate the condition and this also seems reasonable. However, the VA determined a rating of 0% and an argument could be made for a 10% rating. The 10% criteria for Petit mal seizures is a confirmed diagnosis of epilepsy with a history of seizures. The 20% criteria require at least two minor seizures in the last six months. If each heat injury were considered equivalent to a minor seizure, the CI would meet the 10% criteria because he had no episodes of heat injury in the six months prior to separation. If any residual conditions were present they could also be rated but there is no evidence any were present at the time of separation from service.


C5/6, C6/7 Discectomies with Fusion

The CI initially had neck pain with pain radiating into the left shoulder and arm. An MRI showed a left sided C5-6 herniated disc and a more centralized C6-7 herniated disc. On 20020117 the CI underwent C5-6 and C6-7 anterior cervical discectomies and interbody fusion. At his VA C&P exam in November 2002 the CI reported that the pain that had extended down his arm had resolved, but he then had pain in his neck, which radiates laterally into the shoulders and radiates down his back as well. The physical examination documented slightly decreased range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine. The VA rated this at 10% for painful motion.

There is no evidence this condition was unfitting at the time of separation from service. There is no evidence of any duty restrictions or interference with ability to perform required duties due to this condition. Also, only the heat injuries were referred to in the Commander’s letter of 20020802.

Separation Date: 20030315

Cervical Spine

ROM

PT 20011227 MEB H&P 20020701

Neurosurgery

January 2002

(Pre-op)

VA C&P - 20021118

Flexion

0-45⁰ normal

60 Reduced fwd flexion/ext 60 0-45

Combined

340⁰ normal

170⁰
§4.71a Rating 10%
Comments The range of motion of the cervical spine is additionally limited by pain, but not by fatigue, weakness, lack of endurance, or incoordination.

Other Conditions

Residuals, Lumbar Spine Strain; Right, Patellofemoral Syndrome; Residuals, Right Little Finger Sprain; and Residuals, Left Little Finger Sprain. There is no evidence these conditions were unfitting at the time of separation from service. There is no evidence of any duty restrictions or interference with ability to perform required duties due to any of these conditions. Also, only the heat injuries were referred to in the Commander’s letter of 20020802.

Other Conditions Not in the DES

Residuals, Right Shoulder Strain; Residuals, Left Shoulder Strain; Residuals, Left Ankle Sprain; Left, Middle Finger Fracture; Right, Foot Bunion with Hallux Valgus at the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint; and Left, Foot Bunion with Hallux Valgus at the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

________________________________________________________________

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. After careful consideration of all available information the Board unanimously determined that the CI’s condition is most appropriately rated as 8911 Residuals, Status Post Heatstroke X Three at 10% disability. The CI had three serious heat injuries and became heat intolerant. He will always have increased susceptibility to heat injuries. However, he did not have any residual cardiac, neurologic, liver, kidney, or cognitive problems due to this condition. As there is no VASRD code for heat injury, an analogous code must be used. The CI had loss of consciousness and seizure-like activity and 8911 Epilepsy, petit mal is the code that most closely resembles his condition. He had no episodes of heat injury in the six months prior to his separation from service and therefore a 10% rating is warranted.

The Board also considered the following conditions and unanimously determined that none were unfitting at the time of separation from service and therefore no disability rating is applied: Residuals, Postoperative Cervical Discectomy and Fusion at C5-C6 and C6-C7, Cervical Disc Disease with Radiculopathy; Residuals, Lumbar Spine Strain; Right, Patellofemoral Syndrome; Residuals, Right Little Finger Sprain; and Residuals, Left Little Finger Sprain. None of these conditions interfered with performance of required duties and no duty restrictions can be attributed to them. Only conditions that cause a servicemember to be unfit for continued Naval service are eligible to be rated.

The other diagnoses rated by the VA (Residuals, Right Shoulder Strain; Residuals, Left Shoulder Strain; Residuals, Left Ankle Sprain; Left, Middle Finger Fracture; Right, Foot Bunion with Hallux Valgus at the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint; and Left, Foot Bunion with Hallux Valgus at the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint) were not mentioned in the Disability Evaluation System package and are therefore outside the scope of the Board. The CI retains the right to request his service Board of Correction for Naval Records (BCNR) to consider adding these conditions as unfitting.

________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation.

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Residuals, Status Post Heatstroke X Three 8911 10%
COMBINED 10%

________________________________________________________________

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20090217, w/atchs.

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW BOARDS
720 KENNON STREET SE STE 309
WASHINGTON NAVY. YARD DC 20374-5023

IN REPLY REPER TO

1850 CORB:003 10 Sep 2010

From: Director, Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Board~

To:

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR)

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44

(b) PDBR ltr of 19 Aug 2010

1. Pursuant to reference (a), the PDBR reviewed your case and forwarded its recommendation (reference (b)) to the Department of the Navy lor appropriate action.

2. On 9 September 2010, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower & Reserve Affairs) took final action in your case by accepting the recommendation of the PDBR. Your records will be corrected to reflect your separation from {he naval service with a disability rating of 10 percent effective 15 March 2003.

4. The Secretary's decision has been forwarded to the Deputy Commandant of the Marine Corps (Manpower & Reserve Affairs), who will make the appropriate changes to your military records and notify you once they have been completed.

Copy to: PDBR

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00398

    Original file (PD2011-00398.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : The CI states: “I was only rated for Narcolepsy. All evidence considered, there is not reasonable doubt in the CI’s favor supporting recharacterization of the PEB fitness adjudication for the low back pain condition. The C&P examiner stated that the CI was able to perform normal activity during a headache.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00194

    Original file (PD2011-00194.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    ROMs were relatively consistent between examinations although the earlier MEB examination in April 2004 documented a significantly better flexion than the later examinations. The VA C&P examination referred to the MEB examination, and the VA rating of 10% cited the high variability in the flexion examination. In the matter of the left hand numbness condition, right shoulder condition, or any other medical conditions eligible for Board consideration; the Board unanimously agrees that it...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00808

    Original file (PD-2014-00808.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic Cervical Strain523710%Cervical Strain523710%20060620Bilateral Knees and 1 st Metatarsophalangeal Joint, DJD500310%Left Knee Strain526010%20060620Right Knee Strain526010%20060620DJD, Bilateral Great Toes500310%20060620Chronic Right Shoulder Pain Secondary to Impingement Syndrome5099-50030%Right Shoulder Impingement Syndrome520110%20060620Depressive Disorder, NOSNot UnfittingAnxiety Disorder941330%20060607Other x 2 (Not in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01725

    Original file (PD-2012-01725.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Heatstroke 7999-7900 10% Heat Exhaustion 8999-8911 NSC 20020729 No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Nephrolithiasis 7508 0 20020729 Combined: 10% Combined: 0% Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20020807 (most proximate to date of separation [DOS]). Heatstroke Condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01382

    Original file (PD 2012 01382.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    ROM limitation after repetitive use charted above§4.71a Rating20%20%40%* Later VA exams documented similarly limited forward flexion ROMs (June 2011 at 28 degrees [30]; June 2012 at 25).The Board directs attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.The CI underwent a lumbar discectomy of L5-S1 on the left approximately 7 weeks prior to discharge, which was less than 3 weeks after his PEB determination. Pain was rated as 0/10. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00357

    Original file (PD-2014-00357.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board directed attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above evidence.Although not specified, it appeared that the PEB and VA combined both (surgical) feet as a single unfitting condition, coded as a peripheral nerve condition coded 8727 (neuralgia) and rated at 0%.The Board first agreed that there was sufficient evidence to support the unbundling of the feet based on the necessity for bilateral surgery and constant post-operative pain as well as abnormal sensation in each...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00136

    Original file (PD2009-00136.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Board majority determined the Commander’s letter which stated the CI’s knee, neck, shoulder, and hand conditions prevented him from performing the duties of his rating and the required physical fitness test was sufficient evidence to determine both cervical spondylosis and C6 radiculopathy were unfitting at the time of separation. This Board member determined there was insufficient evidence to consider either Cervical Spondylosis with C5-C6 Left Foraminal Stenosis and Arthritis or...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00592

    Original file (PD2009-00592.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), determined unfit for the Sinus Tarsi Syndrome condition, and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Naval and Department of Defense regulations. The CI was separated on 20020814 for Sinus Tarsi Syndrome with chronic bilateral foot and ankle pain rated analogously as code 5279, Metatarsalgia, anterior, (Morton’s Disease), unilateral or bilateral, which assigns...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00036

    Original file (PD2012-00036.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (44B/Welder), medically separated for bilateral bunion pain status post surgical correction of the left and of the right foot (joint at base of big toe). The PEB combined the right foot bunion pain condition and left foot bunion pain condition as a single unfitting condition, coded analogously to 5280 and rated 0%. I direct that all the Department of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01688

    Original file (PD-2014-01688.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The VA also granted a 0% service-connected rating for right radiculopathy associated with the cervical spine disease, citing the normal neurologic examination at the time of the pre-separation VA C&P examination. The...