RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
CASE NUMBER: PD0900160 SEPARATION DATE:
20021106
BOARD DATE: 20110310
____________________________________________________________________________
__
SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record
reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSG (95B,
Military Police) medically separated from the Army in November 2002. The
medical basis for separation was low back pain, neck pain, and left
shoulder pain. At his Medical Evaluation Board (MEB), the low back pain,
cervical pain (with bilateral radicular symptoms) and left shoulder pain
were determined to be medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. Three other
conditions (palpitations, atrial fibrillation, and left foot pain) were
forwarded as medically acceptable conditions. The CI was referred to the
Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) and was found unfit for continued military
service due to low back pain, neck pain and shoulder pain. The low back
pain and neck pain were rated 10% each and the left shoulder pain was
rated 0%. The CI accepted the PEB findings, and was separated at 20%
combined disability using the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating
Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Army and DoD regulations.
____________________________________________________________________________
_________
CI’s CONTENTION: The CI states, “I have 4 disqualifying conditions that
should be rated, as these conditions made me unfit for duty as established
by law: 1) L5-SI disc herniations and discectomy; 2) C5-C6 herniation pain
with bilateral radicular symptoms; 3) Impingement, post-operative left
shoulder pain; and 4) Left foot sesamoid bone fracture, post-sesamoidectomy
(chronic left foot pain).”
____________________________________________________________________________
__
RATING COMPARISON:
|Army PEB – dated 20020716 |VA ( 1 mo. Pre-Separation) – All |
| |Effective 20021107 |
|Condition |Code |Rating |
|TOTAL Combined: 20% |TOTAL Combined: 70% |
____________________________________________________________________________
__
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:
Low Back Pain. The CI injured his back while moving furniture in September
1995. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in October 1995 revealed left
paracentral disc herniation at L5-S1, displacing the left S1 nerve root.
Despite treatment, the CI continued to experience low back pain and
subsequently underwent three more MRIs and numerous evaluations.
Conservative management for his back included activity modification, non-
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physical therapy (PT), and strengthening
exercises. He was evaluated by neurosurgery in March 2001, but the planned
surgery was cancelled due to the surgeon transferring to another base. In
January 2002, he was having increased back pain and was sent to a German
neurosurgeon, where he had a L5-S1 discectomy. After the surgery, the CI
reported a 75% decrease in pain, but he still experienced some pain in the
left buttock and small toe. He could not lift objects heavier than 25 lbs.
without having pain. He had trouble stretching and bending over. He was
able to run and ruck, but as soon as he did he experienced pain that
prevented him from performing other activities for the rest of the day. He
had difficulty firing in the prone position, and after shooting had pain
for the rest of the day. He was able to continue in his military
occupational specialty after the surgery, but he had pain whenever he would
sit or stand for periods longer than two hours.
The 1 July 2002 VASRD was in effect at the time of the CI’s separation from
service. In 2002, lumbar spine range of motion (ROM) impairment was judged
to be slight (10%), moderate (20%), or severe (40%), based upon the rater’s
opinion regarding degree of severity. In this case, the CI had a MEB
examination on 3 June 2002 which demonstrated full thoracolumbar ROM, with
no limitation of motion. Four and a half months later on 18 October 2002,
he had a VA compensation and pension (C&P) goniometric ROM evaluation,
which was just three weeks prior to separation. The Board felt that the VA
exam had greater probative value because it was much closer to separation.
The results of his back exams are summarized in this table:
|Thoracolumbar |Separation Date: 20021106 |
|Goniometric ROM |MEB – 20020603 |VA C&P – 20021018 |
|Flexion (90⁰ normal) |90⁰ |46⁰ |
|Combined (240⁰ |240⁰ |229⁰ |
|normal) | | |
|Comments |5 mos. |3 wks. |
| |Pre-separation |Pre-separation |
The Board evaluated the CI’s limitation of motion, with application of the
2002 VASRD coding and rating criteria, not the current coding and rating
criteria. The Board unanimously agrees that the 5292 code would be the
most appropriate code for the CI’s limitation of lumbar spine motion.
After careful review of all available evidentiary information, the Board
unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20% for low back pain IAW
VASRD 4.71a. It is appropriately coded 5292, and meets criteria for the
20% (moderate) rating.
Neck Pain. The CI injured his neck performing weight training in July
1998. He was doing 25 pound lifts when he felt a sharp pain in his neck.
Within three weeks, he was experiencing radicular symptoms going down both
arms into the thumb, index and middle fingers. An MRI was done in July
1999 and revealed loss of disc height at C5-C6. The CI was offered a
fusion of the C5-C6 vertebrae, by neurosurgery at Madigan Army Medical
Center. However, the CI was transferred to another base before the surgery
could be performed. By January 2000, the CI had worsening of the neck pain
when wearing kevlar and load bearing equipment (LBE). An MRI at that time
revealed a C5-C6 herniated disc, and he had no improvement with cervical
steroid injection. In March 2000, he completed a course of PT, involving
cervical traction. In August 2001, a third cervical MRI was performed and
he was re-evaluated by neurosurgery. Neck surgery was offered to the CI,
but not performed as the surgeon was transferred. Since then, the CI has
not felt confident that surgery would help him, and he has declined any
further surgical management. The CI has still experienced pain, numbness,
and tingling going down both arms. The pain is most noticeable in the left
arm around the elbow region. He reported being awakened at night with pain
and difficulty feeling his fingers in the morning.
As mentioned above, the 1 July 2002 VASRD was in effect at the time of the
CI’s separation from service. The MEB orthopedic neck exam on 3 June 2002
revealed excellent forward flexion, but some limitation of neck motion in
other planes of movement. The pre-separation VA examination documented
pain with motion as well as some tenderness to palpation of the lower
cervical spine. No radicular signs were noted and strength was 5/5 for
both upper extremities. The CI’s two goniometric ROM neck evaluations are
summarized in this table:
|Cervical Spine |Separation Date: 20021106 |
|Goniometric ROM |MEB – 20020603 |VA C&P – 20021018 |
|Flexion (45⁰ normal) |90⁰ |44⁰ |
|Combined (340⁰ normal) |195⁰ |288⁰ |
|Comments |No mention of |Pain with motion |
| |pain | |
The Board evaluated the CI’s limitation of motion, with application of the
2002 VASRD coding and rating criteria, not the current coding and rating
criteria. The Board unanimously agrees that the 5290 code would be the
most appropriate code for the CI’s cervical spine condition. After careful
review of all available evidentiary information, the Board unanimously
recommends a disability rating of 10% for the painful neck condition. It
is appropriately coded 5290 IAW VASRD 4.71a and meets criteria for the 10%
(slight) rating. The Board then directed its attention to the issue of
cervical radiculopathy. The CI clearly had a history of subjective upper
extremity complaints (pain, numbness, and tingling). However, his muscle
strength was normal, and there was no motor impairment. Furthermore, there
was no clearly documented evidence that his radicular symptoms caused any
significant interference with the performance of required military duties.
All evidence considered, the Board cannot find sufficient evidence to
support recommending cervical radiculopathy as an additional unfitting
condition.
Left Shoulder Pain. The CI had left shoulder pain in 1985 which he felt
was due to wearing LBE and a pistol belt. He had increasing pain in
February 1994. His X-rays of the left shoulder were unremarkable. The CI
reported that the pain in the shoulder also radiated down the left arm. In
February 1997, MRI revealed no pathology in the glenohumeral joint, but
possible shoulder impingement syndrome and possible pathology in the
acromioclavicular (A-C) joint. He had several injections into the
shoulder, with no improvement. In May 1997, he underwent left distal
clavicle resection. He had some improvement post-operatively, but over
time the pain returned. In June 1999, he was re-operated on and had a
spike of bone removed from the A-C joint. He continued to have left
shoulder pain which was worse when he wore his LBE, pistol belt or
rucksack. He could not perform pushups and had difficulty firing a rifle.
His goniometric shoulder ROM evaluations are summarized below:
|Left Shoulder |Separation Date 20021106 |
|Goniometric ROM |MEB – 20020603 |VA C&P – 20021018 |
|Fwd Flexion (180⁰ |160⁰ |140° |
|normal) | | |
|Abduction (180⁰ normal) |Not measured |125⁰ |
|Comments |Pain not clearly |Pain with motion |
| |stated | |
The Board examined all of the evidentiary information available. Based on
ROM alone, the left shoulder is essentially non-compensable, using the
VASRD §4.71a shoulder and arm codes (5200 to 5203). However, the VASRD
makes it clear that painful motion of a major joint warrants a rating of
10% IAW §4.40 and §4.59. After due deliberation, considering all of the
evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board
unanimously recommends a separation rating of 10% for left shoulder pain.
It is appropriately coded 5099-5019, and meets criteria for the 10% rating.
Left Foot Condition. The CI had a tibial sesmoidectomy in August of 1999,
with good results. The MEB foot exam was normal. The VA C&P exam
documented a full weightbearing, non-antalgic gate. The left foot
condition was not profiled and was not implicated in the commander’s
statement. The left foot condition was reviewed in detail by the action
officer, and was considered by the Board. There was no indication from the
treatment record that this condition significantly interfered with the
performance of CI’s military duties. All evidence considered, there is not
reasonable doubt in the CI’s favor supporting reversal of the PEB fitness
adjudication for the left foot condition.
Other PEB Conditions. Atrial fibrillation and palpitations were judged to
be within AR 40-501 standards, were not profiled, and were not identified
as disabling in the commander’s statement. All evidence considered there
is not reasonable doubt in the CI’s favor supporting reversal of the PEB
fitness adjudication for these two cardiac conditions.
Remaining Conditions. Nasal deformity, numbness in hands, and several
additional conditions were documented in the Disability Evaluation System
(DES) file. None of these conditions were clinically significant during
the MEB/PEB period, carried permanent duty limiting restrictions, or were
implicated in the commander’s statement. These other conditions were all
reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. It was
determined that none could be argued as unfitting and subject to separation
rating. Additionally, several other conditions were service connected by
the VA, but were not documented in the DES file. The Board does not have
the authority under DoDI 6040.44 to render fitness or rating
recommendations for any conditions not considered by the DES. Therefore,
there is no reasonable basis for recommending any additional unfitting
conditions for separation rating.
____________________________________________________________________________
_
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department
regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by
the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at
the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, Army PEB reliance on the
USAPDA pain policy may have been operant in this case and the CI’s
conditions were adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In
the matter of the low back pain IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously
recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5292. In the matter of the
neck condition IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends a
disability rating of 10%, coded 5290. In the matter of the left shoulder
pain IAW VASRD §4.71a, §4.40, and §4.59, the Board unanimously recommends a
disability rating of 10%, coded 5099-5019. In the matter of the left foot
pain, atrial fibrillation, palpitations, or any other conditions eligible
for Board consideration, the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot
recommend any findings of unfit for additional rating at separation.
____________________________________________________________________________
_
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be
modified as follows, and that the discharge with severance pay be re-
characterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of
the date of his prior medical separation.
|UNFITTING CONDITION |VASRD CODE |RATING |
|Low Back Pain |5292 |20% |
|Neck Condition (Pain and Subjective Radicular |5290 |10% |
|Symptoms) | | |
|Left Shoulder Pain |5099-5019 |10% |
|COMBINED |40% |
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20090201, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.
[pic]
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00767
The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated neck and shoulder pain with degenerative cervical spondylosis as unfitting and rated 0% IAW the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Boards authority as defined in DoDI 6040.44, resides in evaluating the fairness of Disability Evaluation System (DES) fitness determinations and rating decisions for disability at the time of separation. RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CIs prior...
AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00077
Although the VA rating exam cited above would yield a 30% rating, no repeat rating decision is in evidence. The VA rating examination 11 months later did not provide full goniometric ROM measurements for the thoracolumbar spine, stating the CI was too unsteady to cooperate with them. In the matter of the chronic neck pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a rating of 20% coded 5242 IAW VASRD §4.71a.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01412
The PEB coded chronic low back pain 5295 (lumbosacral strain and pain on motion) and rated it 10% based on IAW DOD and VASRD guidelines. At the MEB exam of 25June2002 the CI reported no neck pain or cervical paresthesias. Neither charted exam was compensable based on ROM limitations.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00344
1207A, rated 10% IAW the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD); and adjudicated the chronic left shoulder pain condition as unfitting, rated 0% with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. An examination by a consulted civilian neurosurgeon (on 14 August 2006) 10 months after separation also showed a “full ROM” of the left shoulder with a normal motor and sensory exam; it appeared that the neurologist considered the CI’s...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00366
Neck Condition. He rated the neck pain as 7/10. Knee Condition.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00346
The CI was then medically separated with a 0% disability rating. Right Shoulder Pain . In the matter of the neck and right shoulder condition, for a separation rating after TDRL, the Board unanimously recommends that it be rated as two separate unfitting conditions with rating, by a vote of 2:1, as follows: a cervical spine condition coded 5290 and rated 10%; and, a right shoulder condition coded 5099-5003 and rated 10%; both IAW VASRD §4.71a.
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-01184
The VA rated the same knee condition at 20% disability effective the date of separation from the Army. The Army PEB had adjudicated the neck pain, upper back pain, and arm pain as a single unfitting condition using VASRD code 5293-5003. The evidence clearly shows that the CI had pain in his neck and left arm, as well as his upper back region.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00365
Degenerative joint disease of the cervical spine and mechanical low back pain were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable conditions IAW AR 40-501. The Board also noted that both the PEB and VA ratings were based on this exam, and that there was no subsequent VA data within the DoDI 6040.44 prescribed 12-month period in evidence. Other PEB Conditions .
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01305
As reflected in the cervical spine ROM chart above, at the time of separation, the CI had a moderate to severe limitation of motion in her cervical spine. The data contained in the NARSUM, the PEB requested addendum, the MEB history and exam and the C&P exam documented in the chronic neck pain section above equally applies to the right arm radiculopathy condition discussed below. They later changed the code to 8513 and rated it 40% for a moderate paralysis of all radicular groups in the...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01186
Additionally, members agreed that the chronic low back pain and left shoulder pain conditions, as isolated conditions, would have rendered the CI incapable of continued service within his MOS and therefore each is separately unfitting and merits a separate rating. Physical Disability Board of Review Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical...