RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW
NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: air force
CASE NUMBER: PD0900058 COMPONENT: GUARD
BOARD DATE: 20090709 SEPARATION DATE: 20050915
________________________________________________________________
SUMMARY OF CASE: This covered individual (CI) was active duty Technical Sergeant Aerospace Maintenance Craftsman medically separated from the Air Force in 2005 after almost fourteen total years of service.
He suffered multiple injuries to his right knee and underwent seven knee arthroscopies from 1991 to 2004 for repeated torn medial meniscus and various other chondroplasties as well as an open high tibial osteotomy with iliac bone graft. At the Tibial osteotomy surgery he had a plate inserted. He was called to active duty, deployed to Iraq and injured his right knee on 20 July 2003. This injury was severe enough to warrant returning to CONUS for definitive care. A line of duty investigation determined that his injury was incurred in the line of duty.
Despite the surgeries and appropriate care, he continued to have significant pain and swelling as well as marked tenderness over the medial joint and crepitus and he was referred to the Air Force Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). Despite the line of duty investigation, the Informal PEB determined he was unfit for continued military service but that his injury had existed prior to service and was not aggravated by service. However, the formal PEB determined there was insufficient evidence to overturn the line of duty investigation. He was then separated with a 20% disability rating for 5258 Chronic right knee pain secondary to meniscal injury using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force and Department of Defense regulations.
Using an evaluation completed prior to the time separation from the Air Force, the Veterans Administration (VA) rated this disability as 5010-5260 Status post meniscal tear repair, right knee with degenerative joint disease at 10%. The VA also rated 7805 Scar, right knee at 0% and degenerative joint disease, thoracolumbar spine 5242 initially at 0% and later increased this to 20%.
The CI contends that the formal board did not consider all of his medical evidence as they repeatedly referred to his meniscal repair which was a removal not a repair and they did not specifically address the tibial osteotomy. He may not have been aware that when a meniscus is repaired, the loose portion is removed.
________________________________________________________________
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board used the VASRD as the most favorable basis for rating. After careful consideration of all available information, the Board unanimously concluded that the CI’s condition is appropriately rated at a 30% for 5299-5262 Tibia and fibula, impairment of, Malunion with marked knee disability. While the CI did have multiple surgeries to repair, that is remove the loose portions of, his right medial meniscus he also had various chondroplasty procedures and a high tibial osteotomy to clean up his knee joint and his residual symptoms appear to be more closely related to the osteotomy and to degenerative changes. He did have slightly decreased range of motion and painful motion of his knee but this was not sufficient to warrant a rating under VASRD 5260 Leg, limitation of flexion. His right lower leg had a valgus deformity of six degrees, his right knee had degenerative changes, decreased ROM, and significant pain on motion. He also had a marked amount of tenderness over the tibial osteotomy site and hardware as well as significant pain at rest and crepitus. He continued to have severe problems and required more surgeries after separation.
The Board considered rating this disability under 1) 5258 Cartilage, semilunar, dislocated with frequent episodes of locking, pain and effusion, 2) 5259 Cartilage, semilunar, removal of, symptomatic or 3) 5260 Leg limitation of flexion of or analogous to 4) 5257 Knee, other impairment of but rated analogous to 5262 IAW VASRD 4.7: When there is a question as to which of two evaluations shall be applied, the higher evaluation will be assigned if the disability picture more nearly approximates the criteria required for that rating. Otherwise the lower rating will be applied.
The Board also examined each of the other conditions rated by the VA and did not find any to be unfitting.
________________________________________________________________
RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows and that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation.
Unfitting Condition | VASRD Code | Rating |
---|---|---|
Tibia and fibula, impairment of, Malunion with marked right knee disability | 5299-5262 | 30% |
Combined | 30% |
________________________________________________________________
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20090121, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.
Exhibit C. Department of Veteran's Affairs Treatment Record.
PDBR PD-2009-00058
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON, DC
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
SEP 1 2009
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Physical Disability Board of
Review and under the authority of Section 1554, Title 10, United States Code (122 Stat. 466) and
Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat. 116) it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to XXXXXXXXXXXbe corrected to show that:
a. The diagnosis in his finding of unfitness was tibia and fibula, impairment of,
malunion with marked right knee disability, VASRD code 5299-5262, rated at 30%, rather than
chronic right knee pain secondary to meniscal injury, V ASRD code 5258, rated 20%.
b. On 11 September 2005, he elected spouse-only coverage under the Survivor Benefit
Plan (SBP) based on full retired pay, naming Evelyn M. O'Neal as the eligible beneficiary.
c. He was not discharged on 12 September 2005 with entitlement to disability severance
pay; rather, on that date he was released from active duty and on 13 September 2005 his name was
placed on the Permanent Disability Retired List.
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00064
It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The Board will consider the Category II condition as stated above, in its review of the unfitting right knee condition. Right Knee Condition .
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01316
The lower extremity pain, characterized as “bilateral proximal tibial stress fractures, symptomatic on the right,” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic lower extremity pain, due to bilateral proximal tibial stress fractures, symptomatic on the right”as unfitting, rated at 0%, citing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy.The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. In support...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02796
The physical examination noted normal ROM of the left knee, presence of a scar, and a general comment of “Stable.”The final diagnosis was reported as,“Left knee tibial plateau fracture with ligament injury.”At the MEB NARSUM exam on 6 February 2007, the CI was still using crutches in accordance with the post-operative recovery plan for 8 to 12 weeks of limited weight bearing. Although the ACL and PCL were intact, there was evidence of residual laxity at the time of the PT examination and...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01133
The PEB recommended placement on TDRL since additional surgery had been recommended for the knee condition indicating the condition was not stabilized for rating.At an interim TDRL evaluation in October 2005, the CI had not been able to obtain the recommended surgeries. Examination during the surgery indicated no ligament laxity or instability and the remainder of the joint was normal as at the time of the 2003 arthroscopic surgery. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00591
His condition involved more an injury to his knee; the midshaft of the left knee and ankle, peroneal nerve, weakness and antalgic gait contributed to his pain. Left Lower Leg Condition. Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.
AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00494
Flexion (140⁰ normal)“approximately 0 to 125⁰”100⁰110⁰Extension (0⁰ normal)0⁰0⁰CommentVarus deformity, palpable femoral osteophytes, scar, crepitus, TTP, no instability (including Lachman’s), neg McMurray’s, mildly pos patellar grind3+ effusion, TTP (medial joint line & lat epicondyle), 30 ml normal joint fluid aspirated, steroid injected; Hx incr pain & effusion due to moving over last 2-3 wks, no lockingPainful motion, crepitus, scar nontender, no instability (including Lachman’s), neg...
AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00128
The CI appealed to the formal PEB (FPEB), which made no rating changes and the CI was medically separated with a 20% disability rating. The VA coded using 5262 (impairment of tibia and fibula) and rated the condition as malunion with marked knee disability. In the matter of the right knee condition, the Board unanimously recommends a rating of 30% coded 5262 IAW VASRD §4.71a.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01303
The knee condition, characterized as “right knee anterior cruciate ligament tear, surgically...” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated right knee anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear, surgically reconstructed, as unfitting, rated 10% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated. A pivot shift test...
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00344
SEPARATION DATE: 20060405 Left Knee Condition . By the time of separation, the CI’s condition had improved such that he had a full ROM, albeit that knee pain persisted in spite of treatment.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00784
The DVT condition was determined to be not unfitting. SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44 (Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The right knee (all aspects) and the...