Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01316
Original file (PD-2013-01316.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX   CASE: PD-2013-01316
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army         BOARD DATE: 20140919
SEPARATION DATE: 20011116


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty PVT/E-2 (Basic Trainee) medically separated for chronic lower extremity pain. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The lower extremity pain, characterized as “bilateral proximal tibial stress fractures, symptomatic on the right,” was the only condition forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic lower extremity pain, due to bilateral proximal tibial stress fractures, symptomatic on the right” as unfitting, rated at 0%, citing the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “THE MEDICAL STAFF AT IRELAND ARMY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL IN FORT KNOX, KY FAILED TO PROVIDE ME WITH THE NECESSARY MEDICAL CARE IN ORDER TO DETECT DAMAGE DONE TO MY ACL AND MENISCUS BESIDES BILATERAL STRESS FRACTURES. MRI WAS NEVER OFFERED WHICH MORE THAN LIKELY WOULD HAD CLEARLY SHOWN THE WHOLE SPECTRUM OF MY INJURIES. THIS IS WHY I BELIEVE, I WAS TREATED UNFAIRLY WHEN GIVEN ONLY A 10%. AT THE PRESENT, MY CONDITION HAS ONLY WORSENED, MAKING MY DAILY LIFE A VERY PAINFUL ONE BECAUSE I WASN'T PROPERLY DIAGNOSED THEN.” The CI also writes “I never denied laxity or giving way of the knee, much less twisting it. I showed up to the appointments with a swollen knee which was cause during a running exercise. (As stated on examination’s records). Also, pain level was and is significant & constant. High dosis of pain killers is required daily. Examiner’s findings were biased and careless. He showed a lot of discontent when treating because he said that: “I was faking my conditions in order to go home and that if that’s what I wanted I should get kick out.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting chronic lower extremity pain is addressed below; no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

The Board acknowledges the impairment with which the CI’s service-connected condition continues to burden him but notes the Disability Evaluation System has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs, operating under a different set of laws. The Board further acknowledges the CI’s assertions that his disability disposition was not properly attended to by medical personnel. It is noted for the record that the Board has no jurisdiction to investigate or render opinions in reference to such allegations; redress in excess of the Board’s scope of recommendations (as noted above) must be addressed by the Board for Correction of Military Records and/or the United States judiciary system.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20011029
 VA - based on Service Treatment Records (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam

Chronic Lower Extremity Pain
 5099-5003 0% S/P Stress FX of the R Proximal Tibia 5299-5262 10% STR
S/P Stress FX of the L Proximal Tibia 5299-5262 0% STR
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 0
Combined: 0%
 Combined: 10%
* Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 20117 ( most proximate to date of separation )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The PEB combined left and right tibial plateau stress fracture conditions as a single unfitting condition coded 5099-5003 and rated at 0%. The PEB’s approach likely reflected its judgment that the constellation of conditions was unfitting, not that each condition was separately unfitting. The Board’s initial charge was to determine if the PEB’s approach of combining conditions under a single rating was justified in lieu of separate ratings. The Board does not recommend separate codes and ratings in this circumstance unless members agree that one or more conditions were separately unfitting independently of overall effect. In support of a recommendation for two or more separation ratings derived from such PEB adjudication, members must be satisfied based on a preponderance of the evidence that each condition recommended for separate rating would have independently resulted in MEB referral and a PEB finding that the member was unfit due to physical disability. When the Board recommends separate fitness recommendations in this circumstance, its recommendations may not produce a lower combined rating than that of the PEB.

Chronic Lower Extremity Pain. According to service treatment records (STRs), the CI presented for care of right knee pain after a hard landing during basic training in July 2001. An orthopedic evaluation on 7 August 2001 recorded onset while running and experienced a popping sensation. On examination, tests for instability and meniscus problems were negative. A nuclear bone scan obtained on 17 August 2001 demonstrated increased tracer uptake in both knees at the medial tibia, right more than left. The radiologist concluded there was “suggestion of an early right medial tibial plateau stress fracture.” According to STRs there were no left knee symptoms. A primary care clinic examination on 28 August 2001 noted a positive McMurray sign on the right knee, suggestive of a medial meniscus tear. Follow up with orthopedic surgery on 30 August 2001 noted complaint of pain with crepitus and on examination there was full active range-of-motion (ROM). There was tenderness at the medial joint line and pain with McMurray testing but without any associated click (presence of click with the maneuver would be more indicative of a meniscus tear). Tests for ligamentous instability were negative.

The orthopedic MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) dated 2 October 2001 noted the right knee was symptomatic but not the left. The right knee examination demonstrated full active ROM, without swelling. Strength was normal. There was tenderness of the medial joint line of the right knee. The McMurray test was noted to cause pain but not clicking. No pain was induced while executing a squat or duck walking (provocative maneuvers for meniscus tears). There was no ligamentous instability.

There was no VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) examination proximate to separation. The first VA C&P examination was in May 2007, over 5 years post-separation.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated the chronic lower extremity pain at 0% with application of the USAPDA pain policy. The VA rated the right proximal tibial stress fracture at 10% and the left proximal tibial stress fracture at 0% (each coded 5299-5262). The Board first considered whether the left tibial plateau stress fracture condition and right tibial plateau stress fracture condition, when considered independently, were each separately unfitting for continued military service and therefore warranted separate ratings. The Board noted that the left knee and tibia were asymptomatic and that the bone scan was not interpreted by the radiologist as showing a stress fracture of the left tibial plateau of the knee. The Board concluded there was no impairment of the left tibia or left knee that would be considered unfitting for continued military service. Members agreed therefore, that the left knee condition was not reasonably justified as separately unfitting and accordingly it cannot be recommended for separate disability rating.

All members agreed however that the symptomatic right knee tibial plateau stress fracture was unfitting. The right proximal tibial stress fracture was of the tibial plateau, the surface of the tibia at the knee joint and therefore the Board considered its rating recommendation based on VASRD diagnostic codes for the knee as well as the tibia. There was no limitation of knee motion to support a minimum rating under the VASRD diagnostic codes 5260 or 5261 (limitation of motion codes). Although there was concern the CI may have had a torn meniscus, there was no evidence of a dislocated meniscus with frequent locking or effusion to support a minimum rating under VASRD diagnostic code 5258 (dislocated meniscus). There was no evidence of ligamentous instability to support a minimum rating under the code 5257 (instability).

The Board noted the anterior cruciate ligament tear requiring surgery 5 years after separation. Examination in May 2007 demonstrated a markedly abnormal Lachman test (showing ligamentous instability) which had been normal (no ligament instability) prior to separation. The diagnostic code for impairment of the tibia and fibula indicate disability due to non-union or malunion, neither of which was present. Although an uncomplicated stress fracture is usually expected to resolve completely, the Board noted the possible injury to the meniscus. Therefore all Board members agreed a 10% rating was supported based on VASRD §4.40 (functional loss). The Board noted granting a separate rating for functional loss due to the possible meniscus injury and the tibial plateau stress fracture would be based on the same impairment and is prohibited by VASRD §4.14 (avoidance of pyramiding).

After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a separately unfit determination with a disability rating of 10% for the right knee tibial plateau stress fracture condition (5299-5262) and recommends a not unfit determination for left knee condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the bilateral lower extremity pain was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the right knee pain with tibial plateau stress fracture condition, the Board unanimously recommends a separately unfitting disability rating of 10% coded 5299-5262 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the left tibial plateau condition, the Board unanimously agrees that it cannot recommend a separately unfit determination for additional disability rating. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation.

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Right Knee Pain With Tibial Plateau Stress Fracture 5299-5262 10%
Left Knee Tibial Plateau Condition Not Unfit
COMBINED 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130905, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record





                          
         XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
         President
         Physical Disability Board of Review


 SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20150004177 (PD201301316)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 10% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
                                                      (Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02796

    Original file (PD-2013-02796.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The physical examination noted normal ROM of the left knee, presence of a scar, and a general comment of “Stable.”The final diagnosis was reported as,“Left knee tibial plateau fracture with ligament injury.”At the MEB NARSUM exam on 6 February 2007, the CI was still using crutches in accordance with the post-operative recovery plan for 8 to 12 weeks of limited weight bearing. Although the ACL and PCL were intact, there was evidence of residual laxity at the time of the PT examination and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01532

    Original file (PD-2012-01532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    If he known he had caught something in the shower he would’ve filed for it at [the] time.” SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44 (Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.2) is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The rating for...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00225

    Original file (PD2013 00225.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There were no clinical records or VA C&P examinations proximate to TDRL exit in evidence. The CI was not tender on examination and subsequent neurological examinations were normal and also documented normal gait and posture. Again, there was no proximate C&P examination to TDRL exit, but the gait and posture were noted as normal on a 2010 neurology examination.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01179

    Original file (PD2012 01179.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RATING COMPARISON : ServiceIPEB – Dated 20030221VA -( 2 weeks Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Bilateral Medial Tibial Plateau Stress FractureR-5003-5262 L-5003-526210% 0%Stress Fracture, Lt. Medial Tibial Plateau and FemoralCondyle526220%*20030303Bilateral Medial Femoral Condyles Stress FractureCAT IIIStress Fracture, Right. It is noted for the record that the Board is subject to the same laws for disability entitlements as those under which the Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01332

    Original file (PD-2014-01332.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The bilateral stress fractures, characterized as “chronic bilateral leg pain” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “bilateral tibial stress fractures”as unfitting;each rated 10% for a combinedrating of 20%. Bilateral leg X-rays on 14 January 2009 noted chronic stress changes along both tibiae.At the MEB examination performed on 12 March 2009, 2 months prior to separation, the CI reported...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01224

    Original file (PD-2013-01224.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Bilateral Knee Pain Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the bilateral knee pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00695

    Original file (PD2012 00695.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEB adjudicated “multiple stress reactions/healing stress fractures”as unfitting rated20%,with likely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions,left cuboid stress fracture, bilateral medial tibial plateau stress fracture and right femoral shaft stress fracture, were determined to be Category II (contributing to unfit condition). Bone scan on 22 August 2001 demonstrated healing stress...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01787

    Original file (PD2012 01787.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Left Leg and Right Knee Conditions. The Board opined that the totality of the available evidence supports that the CI’s left leg condition of healed fractures of the femur and tibia resulting in valgus deformity with painful, limited ROM and mild to moderate instability most nearly met the 30% disability rating at the time of permanent separation.After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01090

    Original file (PD-2014-01090.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated “bilateral medial tibial stress fracture” as unfitting, rated 20%, citing application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). invalid font number 31502 SAF/MRB 1500 West Perimeter Road, Suite 3700 Joint Base Andrews, MD 20762Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Section 1554, 10 USC), PDBR Case Number PD-2014-01090.After careful consideration of your application and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00527

    Original file (PD2012-00527.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW BRANCH OF SERVICE: NAVY SEPARATION DATE: 20040305 NAME: CASE NUMBER: PD1200527 BOARD DATE: 20121204 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Petty Officer Second Class/E-5 (IT2/Information Systems Technician), medically separated for a left knee tibial plateau fracture. Condition Tibial Plateau Fracture Full-Thickness Skin and Subcutaneous...