Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00047
Original file (PD2009-00047.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: BRANCH OF SERVICE: USMC

CASE NUMBER: PD0900047 BOARD DATE: 20100407

SEPARATION DATE: 20060810

________________________________________________________________

SUMMARY OF CASE: This covered individual (CI) was a Staff Sergeant/Counter Intelligence Specialist medically separated from the Marine Corps in 2006 after more than 10 years of service. The medical basis for the separation was Lumbago. The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), found unfit for continued military service, and separated at 20% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Naval and Department of Defense regulations.

________________________________________________________________

CI CONTENTION: The CI states: “The board missed the fact that there were two other disks that were damaged due to the injury. I am requesting the PDBR look into this matter for accuracy and possible clarification if at all.”

________________________________________________________________

RATING COMPARISON:

Service PEB VA (3 months Pre-Separation)
Condition Code Rating Date Condition Code Rating Exam Effective
Lumbago 5242-5243 20% 20060713 Low Back Musculotendinous Strain Secondary to Rupture of L5-S1 Disk with Sciatica on Left with Residual Surgical Scar 5237 20% 20060515 20060811
Lumbar Disk Degeneration Cat 2 Conditions that contribute to the unfitting condition(s)
Lumbar Disk Herniation, Status Post Surgery Cat 2
Lumbar Radiculopathy Cat 2

Radiculopathy, Left Lower Extremity Associated with Low Back Musculotendinous Strain Secondary to

Rupture of L5-S1 Disk with Sciatica on Left with Residual Surgical Scar

5237-8520 10% 20060515 20060811
Not in DES Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) 7399-7346 0% 20060515 20060811
Not in DES Tinnitus 6260 10% 20060515 20060811
TOTAL Combined: 20% TOTAL Combined (Includes Non-PEB Conditions): 40%

________________________________________________________________

ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

The CI has had back issues intermittently since 1997 when he jumped out of a helicopter. He had several years of low back pain and occasional left leg radiculopathy that continued to increase in severity. In December 2005, he had exacerbation of his symptoms and was unable to do his activities of daily living, including ambulation. He was loading his vehicle for the drive back to Djibouti when his back gave out. The CI felt the pain shoot down his left leg followed by numbness. He had severe pain radiating down the posterior aspect of his left thigh and posterior calf. This occurred while he was deployed in Africa; he was eventually MEDEVACed after Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was performed, and was not able to return to his active duty status. His symptoms continued to increase and his symptoms were not improved with activity modification, including physical therapy.

Clinical examination as well as radiographic examination at that time revealed lumbar disk degeneration at L5-S1 along with a large left paracentral disk herniation. MRI confirmed this, revealing a large left paracentral disk at L5-Sl. His clinical examination at that time was significant for decreased motor strength graded at 4/5 in the L5 dermatomal distribution. The remainder of his lower extremities were graded as a 5/5. He had a positive straight leg raise and a positive contralateral straight leg raise. He had normal reflexes and normal bowel and bladder function.

Treatment options were discussed with him to include nonoperative and operative intervention. The patient eventually underwent operative intervention with a lumbar decompression and diskectomy surgery. This was performed on 01/17/2006. After surgery, the CI continued to have symptoms and an MRI documented protrusion of L1-L2, L2-L3 disks as well as L5-S1 disk bulge.

Prior to surgery motor strength was 4/5 in L5 distribution, but after surgery it was 5/5 throughout. Reflexes were normal before and after surgery. Straight leg raise was positive prior to surgery but result after surgery was not documented in the NARSUM. Sensation prior to surgery was not documented in the NARSUM, but after surgery sensation to light touch was decreased in the L5 dermatomal distribution of the left leg. Range of motion (ROM) measurements are in the chart below.

(Separation 20060810)

Movement

Thoracolumbar

Normal ROM

ROM Mil

20050522

ROM VA

20060515

ROM Mil

20050302

Flex 0-90 30-50 0-50 (pain) restricted 25%
Ext 0-30 10 0-30 restricted 25%
R Lat flex 0-30 10 0-30 Full lateral flexion
L lat flex 0-30 10 0-30 Full lateral flexion
R rotation 0-30 10 0-30
L rotation 0-30 10 0-30
COMBINED 240 80-100 200
Notes:

Motor strength of both lower extremities is 5/5.

Deep tendon reflexes are 2+. Sensation to light touch is decreased in the L5 dermatomal distribution of the left leg. The remainder of his light touch sensation is intact.

Positive muscle spasm with abnormal spinal contour.

Positive straight leg raise.

Decreased sensation lateral left leg, calf, and foot. No motor loss.

The CI did have herniated disks at multiple levels and repair of one level.

At the time of separation he continued to have some mild low back pain as well as intermittent lumbar radiculopathy. His symptoms were exacerbated by high impact exercises, carrying heavy loads, climbing, bending, twisting, and torquing. There was no improvement despite a high level of motivation and an intensive rehabilitative program.

The CI had another compensation and pension exam done in 2008 but no Veterans Administration Rating Decision (VARD) is available for this evaluation. This evaluation showed thoracolumbar flexion limited to 70 degrees with pain at 20 degrees. This appears to be a worsening over time, not an erroneous exam in 2006.

Radiculopathy:

The CI did have radiating pain and postural abnormalities with decreased feeling on the lateral part of the left leg down onto the left calf, and on top of the left foot. It was mostly a slight sensory loss with no loss of motor function. However, this condition does not appear to have affected the CI’s ability to perform his required tasks and there are no duty restrictions attributable to this condition. Radiating Pain is included in the overall spine rating.

Other Conditions Not in the Disability Evaluation System (DES):

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) and Tinnitus

________________________________________________________________

BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. After careful consideration of all available information the Board unanimously determined that the CI’s condition is most appropriately rated as 20% for 5243 Intervertebral Disc Syndrome.

Spine conditions are rated using the VASRD General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine. This formula is based on the limitation of range of motion (ROM) of the spine with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness, or aching in the area of the spine affected. While having multiple herniated disks could cause a greater limitation of ROM, having multiple herniated disks would not be cause for a higher rating unless there was, in fact, a greater limitation in the ROM. The CI’s back condition is rated at 20% based on thoracolumbar flexion limited to 50 degrees and a combined range of motion of less than 120 degrees that was present when he separated from service.

The Board also considered the condition of Radiculopathy, Left Lower Extremity and unanimously determined that this condition was not unfitting at the time of separation from service and therefore no rating is applied. While a radiculopathy was present at the time of separation as evidenced by decreased sensation in the L5 distribution, this condition did not interfere with satisfactory performance of any required duties. No duty restrictions or limitations are attributable to this condition.

The other diagnoses rated by the VA (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Tinnitus) were not mentioned in the Disability Evaluation System (DES) package and are therefore outside the scope of the Board. The CI retains the right to request his service Board of Correction for Naval Records (BCNR) to consider adding these conditions as unfitting.

________________________________________________________________

RECOMMENDATION: The Board therefore recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.

________________________________________________________________

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20090120, w/atchs.

Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record.

Exhibit C. Department of Veterans' Affairs Treatment Record.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

SECRETARY OF THE NAVY COUNCIL OF REVIEW BOARDS
720 KENNON STREET SE STE 309
WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20374-5023

IN REPLYREFER TO

1850 CORB:003 26 April 2010

From: Director, Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

To:

Subj: PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW (PDBR)

Ref: (a) DoDI 6040.44

(b) PDBR ltr of 12 Apr 10

1. Pursuant to reference (a), the PDBR reviewed your case and forwarded its recommendation (reference (b)) to the Department of the Navy for appropriate action.

2. On 23 April 2010, the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower & Reserve Affairs) took action in your case by accepting the recommendation of the PDBR that no change be made to the characterization of separation or disability rating assigned by the Department of the Navy's Physical Evaluation Board.

3. The Secretary's decision represents final action in your case by the Department of the Navy and is not subject to appeal or further review by the Board for Correction of Naval Records.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 00470

    Original file (PD 2014 00470.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain due to back injury with findings of a disc protrusion at L5/S1” as unfitting, rated at 10%with likely application of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20060421VA -(3 Days Pre-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Chronic LBP w/ disc protrusion at L5/S1523710%L5/S1...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02528

    Original file (PD-2013-02528.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The back condition, characterized as “persistent L5 radiculopathy”, was the forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW SECNAVINST 1850.4E.The Informal PEB adjudicated “persistent L5 radiculopathy failing surgical decompression”as unfitting, rated at0%,with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00525

    Original file (PD2009-00525.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : The CI states: ‘VA rated disability at 40% Service connection on May 28, 1997 and considered me unemployable on 4-22-04 for the back condition military discharged me with at 10%. Follow-up for back pain. The frequency and severity of the CI’s back pain and radicular pain increased significantly during his time on TDRL and this was consistent with the increasing severity of degenerative disc disease and herniated discs with impingement on the right S1 nerve root documented...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00823

    Original file (PD2011-00823.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However both the NARSUM and the treatment record document the radicular pain and weakness continued at the same level of severity after the second surgery and at least until the time of the MEB NARSUM in April 2006. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record VASRD CODE RATING 20% 10% 30% 5243 8620 COMBINED XXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF President Physical Disability Board of Review 6 PD1100823 SFMR‐RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01062

    Original file (PD2011-01062.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in DoDI 6040.44 (4.a) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; and, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” In addition to a review of the ratings for the unfitting conditions, all of the conditions requested for consideration meet the criteria prescribed in...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01583

    Original file (PD2012 01583.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ThePEB adjudicated “chronic pain, low back and left leg due to L4-5 herniated nucleus pulposus”as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy, noting that this decision was based on all three MEB conditions . The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence.Both the PEB and the VA rated the condition using the 5293 code (intervertebral disc syndrome). Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00218

    Original file (PD2009-00218.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The condition was determined to be medically unacceptable and the CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), found unfit for continued military service, and separated at 20% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Air Force and Department of Defense regulations. Additional 5 degrees loss ROM with repeated motion; 5/5 motor; negative straight leg raise; decrease in sensation to pinprick and light touch on left leg and great...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01462

    Original file (PD-2014-01462.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. RATING COMPARISON : Service IPEB – Dated 20060331VA -(> 6 Years Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Back Pain status post (S/P) L5-S1 Discectomy w/o Neurologic or Electrodiagnostic Abnormality...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00411

    Original file (PD2009-00411.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), found unfit only for the Low Back Pain condition determined unfit for continued military service and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Navy and Department of Defense regulations. The Board also considered the condition of Sciatica and unanimously determined that as the CI only had radiating pain and no motor or sensory deficits, no rating may be applied. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01273

    Original file (PD-2013-01273.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Straight leg raises were negative for radicular symptoms and muscle strength and reflexes were normal.The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM)on24June 2004, noted the back pain was aggravated by bending, twisting, stooping, running and interfered with carrying heavy loads while marching.During examination thoracolumbar flexion ranged from 57 degrees anddecreased to 63 degrees, by the third repetition (57, 60, and 63). The Board directed attention to its rating recommendationbased on the above...