Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00015
Original file (FD-2015-00015.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AI R FORCE DISCHARG E REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAM E OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST. FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)     GRADE
(b) (6)

TYPE GEN         I        PERSONA L APPEARANCE     x        I        RECO RD REVIEW
COUNSEL  NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATI ON     ADDRESS ANO OR ORGAMZA TIONOF COUSSEL
YES      No
x




(b) (6)

M EM BER SITTING
VOTE OF THE BOARD










ISSUES   A67.IO   INDEX NUM OCR    A94.53   EXHlBITS SUBMlTTEO TO TUE BOARD
l ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LETI"ER OF NOTIFICATION
BRJEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMIHED AT T IME OF PERSONAL AP PEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HEARJSG DATE     CASE NLM BER

14 Apr 2015      FD-2015-00015
APPLICANT'S ISS\Jf AND THE BOARD'S DECISIONl\L RATIONl\LE A!UlDISCUSSfD ON nm ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCllAROC REVI1lW DOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE.

Case heard in Washi ngton, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to subm it an application to the AFBCMR.






+RE Code

(b) (6)



TNOORSEMENT l>ATl:: 412912015
TO:


550 C STREET WEST.SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB,TX 78150-4742
FROI :
SECRl:'l"ARY OF TH AIR 'ORCE PERSONNEi. rouw·11. AIR FORCE DISCllARGE REVIEW BOARD
1!-3 COMMAN D OR, F.F. WJ NC, JRO FLOOR
A.'IOREWSAFB. MD 20761-7001
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00      (EF-V2)
Previous



AIR FORCE DISCllARG E REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RAT ION ALE
CASE NIJ:\IBER

FD-2015-00015

GENERAL : The appl icant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the appl icant and the factors lead ing to the discharge.

FIN DING : The Board denies the upgrade of the d ischarge, and change of reenlistment code is denied .

The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equ i t y or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to ident i fy any that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSU E: The applicant recei ved a General discharge for Misconduct - Minor Disci pli nary Infractions

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibili ty to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is wan-anted. I n reviewing discharges, the Board presu mes regularity i n the conduct of governmental affa i rs unless there is substantial cred ible evidence to rebut the presumption. to incl ude evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board com pleted a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the perti nent standards of equity and propriety. The appl ican t"s record of service included three A rt icle I S"s recei ved. His misconduct incl uded mak ing a false officia l statement, violati ng a no contact order, and fail ure to obey a no contact order.

The applican t submitted no issues regard ing the ineq u i ty or im propriety of his discharge. The appl icant does submit that he wou l d l ike a second chance despite his d iscrepa ncies so t hat he may serve his country in the
U ni ted States Arm y. The Boa rd opined that through the administ ra t ive actions taken, the applicant had
ample opportuni ties to change his behavior. They found the seriousness of t he w il l fu l m isconduct offset any posi ti ve aspects of the appl ican t's duty perfonnance. The Board reviewed t he enti re record and found no evidence of im propriety or ineq uity to wan-ant an upgrade of the discharge. A discha rge is upgraded only i f the appl icant and t he Board can establ ish that an ineq u ity or impropriet y took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to just i fy an u pgrade of the discharge characteri zat ion or t he reenlistment code.

CONCLUSION : The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive req u irements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was pro\'idcd full administrat ive due process.

In view of the foregoi ng findi ngs, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remai n unchanged.



Attachment: Exami ner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00118

    Original file (FD-2015-00118.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appealsfor upgradeof discharge toHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)but declinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedonthe available service record. Theattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdata ontheapplicantandthefactorslead ing tothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00310

    Original file (FD-2014-00310.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeof dischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservice record. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00409

    Original file (FD-2014-00409.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GEN ERAL: The applicant appealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorslead ing tothedischarge.FIN DING:TheBoard -denies theupgradeof the discharge.ISSUE:Theapplicantreceived aGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-M inor Discipl inaryInfractions

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00101

    Original file (FD-2014-00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedand requeststhatthereview becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriercontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthed ischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -Minor Discipl inary Infractions.TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underi ts...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00101

    Original file (FD 2014 00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedand requeststhatthereview becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriercontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthed ischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -Minor Discipl inary Infractions.TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underi ts...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00758

    Original file (FD-2014-00758.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARD IIEARJ NGRECORD'IA;\lEOFSERVICE'lt:'•lllEn (L,\ST,tlllSr;\llDDLE INITlr\L) (;Jt,\Ot: ,\fN/SSAN(b) (6) (b) (6) TYPE GEN I l'ER!SO 'ALAPPEARANCE x I Rt..COROHEVlt..W C:O SU. '\\IIore()\"f I "I)ORORC "I/TIO\ IODRr\\ "DORORG "l/\110\Ot(01 "rt HS '• x\ \IE\IBERSITTI G llON GFN LO11K' OTllER DEN\ (b)(6) x i-xi-i- ISSlI'S A94.05 l\Of\ '-1\IOtR A67.10 t.XlllKII s SIJn"nTt:O TOTll £BOARD I ORDl R Al'POIN rINGI Ill·BOARD \PPI I('A110\JIORRI \IIW OF DISC'llARGE l11I fR 01...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00477

    Original file (FD-2014-00477.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethe reenlistmentcode. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. inviewoftheforegoing find ings:theBoardconcludesthatapplicanf sreenlistmentcodeis moreaccuratelyreflectedas 3Kandshouldbe changedunderthe provisionsof TitleI 0,USC1553.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00426

    Original file (FD-2014-00426.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepe1tinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorsleading tothe discharge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE:TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuse TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underitsresponsibilityto...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00750

    Original file (FD-2014-00750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforanupgradeofdischargetoHonorableandachangeofreasontothenarrative.The applicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl ined andrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe available servicerecord.Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinent data ontheappl icant and thefactors lead ing tothe discharge. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reason and autho1ity for discharge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00679

    Original file (FD-2014-00679.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReview Board(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontains availablepertinent dataonthe applicantandthefactorsleadingtothe discharge. FINDING: TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthe discharge.