Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00118
Original file (FD-2015-00118.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)      GRADE
(b) (6)
TYPE GEN         I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE     x        I        RECORD REVIEW
COUNSEL  NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZAT ION     ADORESS ANO OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
YES      No
x
VOTE OF THE BOARD
MEMBER SITTING   HON      GEN      UOTHC    OTHER    DENY
(b) (6)  x
x x x x
ISSUES   A94.53   INDEX NUM.BtR    A67.10   EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD
1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APPLICATION FOR REVlEW OF DISCHARGE
LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITIED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OFPERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HEARING llATE    CASt NU:l1BER

09 Jul 2015      FD-2015-00118
APPLCANT·s ISSUE ANDTHE BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONl\l.E ARE DISCUSSED ON 11lEATTACFIEDAIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DllClSIONAL RATIONALE.

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.








b) (6)

-...·-- -...-·.....,,r<o .         .-




.........


. ;U _..,.---y--a-              

TO:      FROM:
SECRETARY OFTl-IE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCii..
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REV!EW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40      1$35 COl\U\1.AJ'fD DR, ££ WING, JRD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742      ANDREWS AFB.MD!0762 7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077,JAN 00  (EF-Y2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARG E R EVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NIJ;\ BER

FD-20 IS-00118

GEN ERAL: The appl ican t appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a persona l appearance before the Discharge Review Board (ORB) but declined and req uests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors lead ing to the discharge.

FIN DING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant recei ved a General discharge for Misconduct -Minor Disci pl inary Infractions

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under i ts responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characteri zation of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regulari ty in the conduct of govern mental affairs unless there is substantial cred i ble evidence to rebut the presumption, to incl ude evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the perti nent standards of equity and propriety. The applicant's record of service i ncl uded seven Letters of Reprimand for failing to show for mandatory M-1 6 trai ning, a l tering an Ainnari's official PT test score, failing to show for mandatory med ical appointment, downloading unauthori zed software onto a government computer, fail ing to show up to work on time, and failing to go at t he prescribed time to his WAPS Testing; five Letters of Counseling for fai l ing to obey a lawful order to not use an electronic device while perfom1ing escort duties, failing to report to designated place of duty, fai ling to show for mandatory augmentee traini ng, tell ing co-workers that he smoked marijuana on leave and an investigation showed that he made the story up to sound ·'cool", and failing to perfonn PT duties by not completi ng the exercises.

The member stated he was told his discharge would automatically be upgraded after a certain amoun t of t ime. The mem ber also cited his desire to receive the G.I. Bi ll benefits as justification for upgrad e. The OR B noted that when the appl icant applied for these benefits, he signed a statement (DD Form 2366, on Ju ne 5, 2009) that he understood he m ust receive an Honorable discharge to recei ve futu re educational entitlemen ts. The Boa rd also noted the issue in regards to the automatic upgrade was common result of miscomm unication, at the t ime of discharge, when the applicant is briefed that thei r discharge wi ll automaticall y be upgraded after six months. While a d i charge may be upgraded after six months, the
upgrade is by no means automat ic. A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establ ish that an ineq ui ty or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. The Board wa sympathetic to the impact from the loss of these benefi ts to the appl icant; however, this is not a matter of inequ i ty or impropriety wh ich woul d warrant an upgrade.

CONCLUSION: The Discha rge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent wi th the proced ural and substanti ve req u irements of the discharge regulation, was wi thi n the discretion of the discharge authori ty, and that the appl icant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determi nes the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attach ment: Exami ner's B1ief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00666

    Original file (FD-2014-00666.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERA L: Theapplicant appeals foranupgradeofthedischarge to Honorable;a changetothereasonand authorityforthedischargeandtochangethere-enlistmentcode.TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard DRB,withcounsel,atAndrewsAFBonMarch 10, 2015. The followingwitnessalsotestifiedontheapplicant'sbehalf:(wife)(b) (6)Thefollowingadditionalexhibits weresubmittedatthe hearing:Exhibit #4: Applicant'sContentionsExhibit#5:CharacterreferencelettersThe...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00679

    Original file (FD-2014-00679.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReview Board(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontains availablepertinent dataonthe applicantandthefactorsleadingtothe discharge. FINDING: TheBoard deniestheupgradeofthe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00761

    Original file (FD-2014-00761.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedon theavailable servicerecord.The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniesthe upgradeofthe discharge. ISSUE: Theapplicantreceiveda GeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDiscipl inaryInfractionsTheAirForce...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00409

    Original file (FD-2014-00409.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GEN ERAL: The applicant appealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorslead ing tothedischarge.FIN DING:TheBoard -denies theupgradeof the discharge.ISSUE:Theapplicantreceived aGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-M inor Discipl inaryInfractions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00758

    Original file (FD-2014-00758.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARD IIEARJ NGRECORD'IA;\lEOFSERVICE'lt:'•lllEn (L,\ST,tlllSr;\llDDLE INITlr\L) (;Jt,\Ot: ,\fN/SSAN(b) (6) (b) (6) TYPE GEN I l'ER!SO 'ALAPPEARANCE x I Rt..COROHEVlt..W C:O SU. '\\IIore()\"f I "I)ORORC "I/TIO\ IODRr\\ "DORORG "l/\110\Ot(01 "rt HS '• x\ \IE\IBERSITTI G llON GFN LO11K' OTllER DEN\ (b)(6) x i-xi-i- ISSlI'S A94.05 l\Of\ '-1\IOtR A67.10 t.XlllKII s SIJn"nTt:O TOTll £BOARD I ORDl R Al'POIN rINGI Ill·BOARD \PPI I('A110\JIORRI \IIW OF DISC'llARGE l11I fR 01...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00019

    Original file (FD-2015-00019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable;achangetothenarrativereasonandachangetothereenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataon theapplicantandthefactors lead ingto the discharge. FINDJNG: TheBoarddenies theupgradeof the discharge;reasonandauthorityfor discharge andchangeofreenlistmentcode. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00101

    Original file (FD-2014-00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedand requeststhatthereview becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriercontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthed ischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -Minor Discipl inary Infractions.TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underi ts...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00101

    Original file (FD 2014 00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedand requeststhatthereview becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriercontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthed ischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -Minor Discipl inary Infractions.TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underi ts...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00750

    Original file (FD-2014-00750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforanupgradeofdischargetoHonorableandachangeofreasontothenarrative.The applicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl ined andrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe available servicerecord.Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinent data ontheappl icant and thefactors lead ing tothe discharge. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reason and autho1ity for discharge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00581

    Original file (FD-2014-00581.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GE ERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeof discharge toIlonorablc.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequests thatthe reviewbecompletedbasedonthe avai Iableservice record.Theattachedbriercontai nsavailable pertinentdata onthe applicantandthefactors lead ingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniesthe upgradeofthe discharge. ISSUE: The applicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforM iscondu<.