Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00439
Original file (FD-2014-00439.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARJN C RECORD
NA.\'IE OF SERVICE MEl\IBER (LAST, Fl RST i\llOOLE IN ITIAL)        GRADE
(b) (6)
TYPE GE         I        PERSONAL APPEARANCE     x        I        RECORD REVIEW
COl'!\SEL         ""\1[ or C'OL'iS(L \,\0 OR ORCASIZATIO;\     \OORESSA\D OR ORC,\,\11.ATIO.S OF tot:EL
\ES
x
VOTEOF fH.E BOARD
M EM BER SITTING         llON     GL'I     UOTllC   OTllER   DENY
(b) (6X*

X*











ISSUt,S







A94.53












li\Ut.. i\ l,,_\ 161;.K






A66.00
X*

x
x
EXHIBITS SUBMlTIED TO TUE BOARD
J ORIJH{Al' l'OIN I IN(j I Ht BOARIJ
APPUCAl ION I-OR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
LEnl:.R OF NOTIFICATION
BRll:.F or Pl:RSONNl:L FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO TllE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXl llBITS SUBIITTED ATTIME OF PERSONAL APPEARA.l\C'E
TAPE RECORDING or PERSONAL APPEARANCE HtARl:-.G


H[A.Rl \ C O\T[    C'\E 1'l\IBER

24 Apr 20 15     FD-20 14-00439
AfPLICA. TS !:;Sl..t."- 0 IHt.DOARln l>t<.C>IU.ALKA 110 "1.,1,AJ\.t DISCUSSEDO\ THE ATIACl!ED AIR FORCt. UHl\R(,b IU:Vl w (j()Al) lk(.'IAL RAI IO'IAU.

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an appl ication to the AFBCM R.
*Narrative








(b) (6)


!;\'OORSE.'\tE'.'T         DATE: 4 28/ZOlS
TO:      FR01:
HIUTAR\ Ort1£AIR>ORCL PCRSO SEL COt:CIL
AIR fORC'L Ol(llARCE RE\'IE\\ BOARD
550 C STRFET \'v'ESI. SU Tl 40    tS C-0\l\l \'0 DR. EC \\l,C,JRO FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB. I X 78150-4742     A"DRE\\ S i\f 8, MD 20762-7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077,JA ' 00         (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00439

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct - Drug Abuse

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant 's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The applicant's record of service included one Article 15 marijuana use.

Applicant contends discharge was inequi table because it was based on an isolated , one time incident in 60 months of service. The record indicates that the applicant was discharged for Misconduct- Drug Abuse. He received an Article 15 for wrongful use of marijuana. After review of the record, the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that in his five years of service was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use. Notwithstanding the applicant's claim that this was an isolated incident, the Board found the seriousness of drug abuse affords the commander the authority to pursue administrative discharge to uphold good order and discipline, regardless of whether or not the member has an otherwise clear record . The Board found the negative aspects of the willful misconduct outweighed the positive aspects of the applicant's perfo1mance and concluded that the discharge was appropriate.

A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record , the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation , was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00761

    Original file (FD-2014-00761.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedon theavailable servicerecord.The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataonthe applicantandthe factorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniesthe upgradeofthe discharge. ISSUE: Theapplicantreceiveda GeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDiscipl inaryInfractionsTheAirForce...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00581

    Original file (FD-2014-00581.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GE ERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeof discharge toIlonorablc.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequests thatthe reviewbecompletedbasedonthe avai Iableservice record.Theattachedbriercontai nsavailable pertinentdata onthe applicantandthefactors lead ingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniesthe upgradeofthe discharge. ISSUE: The applicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforM iscondu<.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00613

    Original file (FD-2014-00613.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge Review Board (ORB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbe completedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischargeTheBoard finds that neither theevidenceofrecord nor that provided by theapplicant substantiates aninequityorimproprietythat would...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2012-00605

    Original file (FD-2012-00605.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicant wasofferedapersonalappearancebefore theDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbe completedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactors leadingtothedischarge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuseThe AirForceDischarge...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00750

    Original file (FD-2014-00750.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforanupgradeofdischargetoHonorableandachangeofreasontothenarrative.The applicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl ined andrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedonthe available servicerecord.Theattachedbrief contains availablepertinent data ontheappl icant and thefactors lead ing tothe discharge. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reason and autho1ity for discharge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00658

    Original file (FD-2014-00658.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgrade ofdischarge to Honorable. Theapplicant wasoffered apersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclinedandrequests thatthereviewbecompleted basedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthe factors leadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00473

    Original file (FD-2014-00473.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetoHonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailable service record.Theattached brief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactors lead ingtothedischarge. FINDING: The Boarddeniestheupgradeof thedischarge. ISSUE: Theapplicantreceived aGeneraldischargeforMisconduct -DrugAbuseThe...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00031

    Original file (FD-2015-00031.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedontheavailable servicerecord.The attachedbriefcontains available pertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FIN DING: TheBoarddeniestheupgrade ofthe discharge.ISSUE: The applicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinaryInfractionsThe...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00602

    Original file (FD-2014-00602.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorableandtochangethereasonandauthorityforthe discharge.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothe discharge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniesthe upgrade of the discharge andchange ofreasonandautho1ityfor discharge. ISSUE: The...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00171

    Original file (FD-2014-00171.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbe completedbasedon the availableservice record. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleading tothedischarge.