Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00602
Original file (FD-2014-00602.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


AIR FORCE OISCRARGE REVIEW BOARD ll EAR I G RECORD
Nr\i\ I E OF SER\'ICF \ I E.\lllE H (I.AST, FlllST i\ llDnu:I N ITIA L)        GRA OE   .\FS="ISSAN
(b) (6(b) (6)
I \'1'1'. GI:     I        PER ONAL APPEARANCE      :<       I        RECORD REVIEW
C.OL".,SCL       '"It Ot<Ol "11 \'DOR ORG\.'17..ATIO'       \DORI\\ \'\ OOR ORG \'\I L\ 110'm COi ' lL YES   '•                          -
x
       \"OTE Of THE BOARD
MEi\IBER SlTTIN110      Gl-'1    UOlllC   Ol llER  DEN\
(b) (6X*
X*

X* X*
X*
l!\M t:S  A94.53   l'fll 'i\l '\IOLR  A66.00   EX lllBITS SUUi\lrlTED TO TllE BOAIU>
I URDl·R .\l'l'OI N I IN(J I Ill UOA RD
2 .\Pl'I I( Al ION FOR RI \'IF\\" 01 DISCll.\RGE
3 1 1 I ll·R OF NO l 11 1(' \ 110"
BRll I 01 PI RSONNI I 1 11 1
COU'ISI 1 S RI 1 1 \I H> I Ill BO \RU
\DDll 10' \I I XI 111311 S Sl B\ll I II D \l 111\IE 01
l'I RSO' \I ·\l'l'I \ll.\ t I
I \l'I RI I llRIJIN(1 01 l'I R\O"i \l \l'l'l \R "CF llf,\RIMi

IH \Rl\ G 0\ rt     ( \'l l \181 R

17 l\ lar 20 15   FD-2014-00602
APPtl..A1' r s h'il I A'\0 rtfl JV>At\I)' DI "hlO'-A.l RA.110""'-[ i\Rr OIS(l 'S.Sm 0'Tllf ATTAC'llfD AIR fORC...... 01..C'llAR(,[ IU.\.'1£'\\ R\"MltD Of"Cl'."il<,...AI. RATIO\Al r

Case heard i n Washi ngton. D.C.

Advise appl icant or the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appe rancc wi1h ·\vith ou l cou nsel , and t he right to su bm i t an a ppl ication 10 t he /\ l :B('M R.

*Naffat i vc Rea son







(b) (6)


IN OOR E\IE'ff   OA I F: 312.t/2015
ro-      IRO\I
S.\I" \llU!R      'ti RI 1\11\ OI 1111 \111 IOllCI Pl R. 0'CL ( Ol ( II
\IRtORCl lll\(11 \R<,t Rl\ ll.\\ 10\RD

Hll ( <., lltl I I \\ I <., \t 111 .m
l<H C 0\1\1 \,00W . I• \\l'C. HtUH OOH.

R "1)()1 1'11 \I H. I \ -:-1 50.r :?       "lllll\\' \18, \ID n?-7001


A FllQ FORl\ I 0-2077, JA 00      (EF- V::!)      






Af R FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOA RD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE Nt.Ji\IBER

FD-2014-00602

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (ORB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contai ns available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reason and autho1ity for discharge. ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct - Drug Abuse
The Air Force Discharge Review Board , under its responsi bi l ity to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is wananted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regulari ty in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantia l cred ible evidence to rebut the presumption , to incl ude evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that Jed to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pe11inent standards of equity and propriety. The appl icanf s record of service included one A11icle 15 and one Vacation of on-J udicial pu nishment. Applicant's misconduct included wrongful l y usi ng JWH-018 , a schedule I controlled substance and being derelict i n the performance of duties.

The appl icant contends discharge was ineq u itable because i t was based on one isolated i ncident in 33 months of service and that this was not her usual behavior. The record shows that the applicant made a sworn statement during an OSI i n vestigation admitting to smok ing spice but did not have any prior use to joi ning the mili tary. After review of the record , the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant d id not know right from wrong or that i n her al most th ree years of service was u naware of the Air Force pol icy of zero tolerance to drug use. The Board found the negati ve aspects of the wi llful miscond uct outweighed the posi tive aspects of the applicant's performance and concluded that the discha rge was appropriate.
A discharge is u pgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequi ty or impropriety took place at the t im e of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to just ify an u pgrade of the discharge characteri zat ion, reason for the discharge or the reenl istment code.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concl udes that the discharge was consistent with the procedu ral and substantive requ irements of the discha rge regulation , was wi th in the discretion of the discharge authori ty, and that the appl icant was provided full ad m inistrat ive due process.

I n view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should rema i n unchanged.

Attachment: Exami ner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00426

    Original file (FD-2014-00426.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepe1tinentdata onthe applicantandthe factorsleading tothe discharge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE:TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-DrugAbuse TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underitsresponsibilityto...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00031

    Original file (FD-2015-00031.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthe reviewbecompletedbasedontheavailable servicerecord.The attachedbriefcontains available pertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FIN DING: TheBoarddeniestheupgrade ofthe discharge.ISSUE: The applicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinaryInfractionsThe...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00758

    Original file (FD-2014-00758.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARD IIEARJ NGRECORD'IA;\lEOFSERVICE'lt:'•lllEn (L,\ST,tlllSr;\llDDLE INITlr\L) (;Jt,\Ot: ,\fN/SSAN(b) (6) (b) (6) TYPE GEN I l'ER!SO 'ALAPPEARANCE x I Rt..COROHEVlt..W C:O SU. '\\IIore()\"f I "I)ORORC "I/TIO\ IODRr\\ "DORORG "l/\110\Ot(01 "rt HS '• x\ \IE\IBERSITTI G llON GFN LO11K' OTllER DEN\ (b)(6) x i-xi-i- ISSlI'S A94.05 l\Of\ '-1\IOtR A67.10 t.XlllKII s SIJn"nTt:O TOTll £BOARD I ORDl R Al'POIN rINGI Ill·BOARD \PPI I('A110\JIORRI \IIW OF DISC'llARGE l11I fR 01...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00581

    Original file (FD-2014-00581.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GE ERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeof discharge toIlonorablc.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequests thatthe reviewbecompletedbasedonthe avai Iableservice record.Theattachedbriercontai nsavailable pertinentdata onthe applicantandthefactors lead ingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniesthe upgradeofthe discharge. ISSUE: The applicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforM iscondu<.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00594

    Original file (FD-2014-00594.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetoHonorable. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge A discharge isupgradedonly ifthe applicantandtheBoardcanestablishthatan inequityorimproprietytookplaceatthe time of discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00101

    Original file (FD-2014-00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedand requeststhatthereview becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriercontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthed ischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -Minor Discipl inary Infractions.TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underi ts...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD 2014 00101

    Original file (FD 2014 00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdecl inedand requeststhatthereview becompletedbasedonthe availableservicerecord.The attachedbriercontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthed ischarge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor Misconduct -Minor Discipl inary Infractions.TheAirForceDischarge ReviewBoard,underi ts...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00725

    Original file (FD-2014-00725.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorableorGeneral. Theapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebefore theDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbe completedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattached briefcontains availablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00754

    Original file (FD-2014-00754.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleading tothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: The applicantreceivedaGeneraldischargefor MisconductThe...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00396

    Original file (FD-2014-00396.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneraldischarge forMisconduct...