Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00658
Original file (FD-2014-00658.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
:\'AM E Of SERVICE MEi\IDER (LAST. FIRST ;\llOOLE l ITJAL)         GRADE
(b) (6)

TYPE GEJ         I        PERSONAL APPEARA; CE    x        I        RECORD REVIEW
COCNS£1.  'IA\IE or COl'XS[L A\DOR ORGA\IZ.ATIO\      \DDRESS \1' D OR ORCA\ IZA110:-1or COL:>SEL
''ES     'lo
x
VOTE OFTHE BOARD
ME1BER SITTIN110'1    GEN      UOTllC   OTHER    DENY
(b) (6)  x
x x x x
ISSUES   A94.05   lOU l\ \IBlR      A67.10   EXHIBITSSUBMlITEO TO THE BOARD
I ORDrR APPOIN"l IN(j 1llE BOAIW
2 APPLICA rlON I OR REVIEW OF DISC! IARGE
3 Lff rER OF 'lOTIFIC'ATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL' RELEASE TO TllE BOARD
ADDrrlONAL EXlllBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSO, AL APPEJ\RA;"iCE
TAPF RECORDNG or PER O'lAL APPEARANCE HEARING
H [A Rl'.\ G D\T£   CASlM.\ IBER

02 Apr 20 15     FD-20 14-00658
APPLICA.\TS ISSUEA. DTHE BOlllUn DECISIO!'l\L RAllO'lllLEARE DISCUSSED O'i TIIEATTACHEDAJ R FORct O&HARC. llt"llWllOARO llt(.ISIQ'il\L KArtQ\ALE.


Case heard in Washington , D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.










(b) (6)


L"liDORSE.\1£:'.DATE: 4123no1s
TO:      l'RO\I:
SAJ-/MRHK        CACT\A\ Of -r'lll. AIR f-ORC:E PCIRSO!\!'tL (0l' Cl l.
\IR t·ORC E DISCllARCE REVIEW BO \RD
550 C STRH.T WEST, SUI I L 40    l !Q5 CO\t'l\'() OR. t: \\ l!\ C.JRD FLOOR
RANOOLPll AFB. rx 781504742      \ 0Rt.\\ AFB. \10 l076l·7001

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2)  Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISION AL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER


FD-2014-00658

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct -Minor Disciplinary Infractions

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant 's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption , to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The applicant 's record of service included one Article 15 for physically controlling a vehicle while drunk, one vacation Action to Article 15 punishment for failure to refrain from drinking while underage, and one Letter of Reprimand for failure to pass a standardized field sobriety test and being detained by Security Forces.

The applicant states that his discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in the service. He noted graduating at the top of his technical school class, actively volunteering in the community, and winning a Top Fitness Award. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of recommendation and other accomplishments. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.

A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterization , reason for the discharge or the reenlistment code.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.



Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00658

    Original file (FD-2013-00658.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGE REVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEAFSN/SSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xISSUESA92.21A92.0lINDEXNUMBERA67.101 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASENUM8ER05Feb2014...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00177_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00177_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE AfSN/SSANALAPPEARANCEX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORGANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY ISSUESA94.S3INDEXNUMBERA84.001ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFJCATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEX*+x•+TAPE RECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINCDATE CASENUMBER19Jul2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00456

    Original file (FD-2014-00456.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsfor upgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(ORB),withcounsel,viavideoteleconferencebetweenAndrewsAFBMaryland andTravisAFB, CAonSeptember25,2014. The attachedbriefcontains availablepertinent data onthe applicantandthefactorsleading tothe discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00767

    Original file (FD-2014-00767.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorableTheapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbe completedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothe discharge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniesthe upgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00328_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00328_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,tochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischarge,andtochangethereenlistmentcode.Theapplicant appearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB),without counsel,atAndrews AFBon01Aug2013. Thefollowingadditionalexhibitsweresubmittedatthehearing:Exhibit#5:Applicant'sContentionsTheattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2012 | FD-2012-00652

    Original file (FD-2012-00652.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealstochangethereasonandauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethereenlistment code. TheapplicantappearedandtestifiedbeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB),withoutcounsel,viavideo teleconferencebetweenAndrewsAFBMarylandandRandolphAFBTexason27Jan2014. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00425

    Original file (FD-2014-00425.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischarge Review Board (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothe discharge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00075

    Original file (FD-2014-00075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable,andchangetheauthorityforthedischargeandtochangethe reenlistmentcode.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgrade ofthedischarge,andchangeofauthorityfordischarge,and changeofreenlistmentcodearedenied.

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2015-00253

    Original file (FD-2015-00253.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: TheapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetoHonorable.Theapplicantwasoffereda personalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneral discharge forMisconduct-Drug AbuseTheAirForceDischargeReviewBoard,...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00211

    Original file (FD-2014-00211.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDT,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADEX RECORDREVIEW AFSN/SSANADDRESSANOOR ORGANIZATION OFCOUNSELGEN UOTHC OTHER1ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATION FORREVIEWOF DISCHARGELEITEROF NOTIACATIONBRIEF OF PERSONNELALECOUNSEL'SRELEASETO TifE BOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTED ATTIMEOF PERSONAL APPEARANCETAPE RECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEARINGDATE CASE NUMBER 04Sep 2014 FD-2014-00211 r 1-;\-"'::::'",•::-:" • t - t 1 \fi ,''• (:' -.,.,.- ,f ·r-;,i\j"°",1'· ,- --•I...