Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00001
Original file (FD-2009-00001.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

    
    
 

      

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN

 

TYPE GEN

COUNSEL

PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW

NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

  

 

VOTE OF THE BOARD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEMBER ITT a
ne HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
xX
x
x
xX
xX
| oe ; 8 _ | .
ISSUES A93.01 INDEX NUMBER A84.00 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD
A94,55 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL VILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
17 Dec 2009 FD-2009-00001

 

 

APPLICANT'S ISSUE-AND THE:BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE:ATTACHED AIR FORCEDISCHARGE REVIEW: BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE.

 

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

rrr rte re eee

 

 

 

Seis ‘ INDORSEMENT. ee re
TO FROM:
SAE/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
ee rere AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
950 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00001

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to general and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDINGS: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reenlistment code is denied.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant contends his discharge was inequitable because he was young and immature at the
time of his discharge.

The essence of the applicant’s appeal is that he should not be penalized indefinitely for a mistake he made
when he was young. The records indicated the applicant failed to attend unit training assemblies on the
following dates: 18 — 19 November 1995, 4—5 December 1995, and 20 — 21 January 1996. The DRB
recognized the applicant was 22 years of age when the discharge took place. However, there is no evidence
he did not know right from wrong. Additionally, after reviewing the records the DRB had, the DRB did not
find a valid reason for the applicant failing to report for duty. The Board opined the applicant was older than
the vast majority of first-term members who properly adhere to the Air Force’s standards of conduct. The
DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge and the reenlistment code were
appropriate due to the misconduct.

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00055

    Original file (FD-2009-00055.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD REVIE' ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL UOTHC - T x ~ - - T x xX Xx t- Xx ISSUES INDEX NUMBER A93.01 A67.00 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER Of NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD PERSONAL APPEARANCE ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE 17 Jun 2010 CASE NUMBER FD-2009-00055 ee Case heard in Washington, D.C. application to the AFBCMR. The Board...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00142

    Original file (FD-2009-00142.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE ATTACHED AIR LORCE DISCHARGE REV EW SOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE. Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00191

    Original file (FD-2009-00191.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The Board noted the issue was common result of miscommunication, at the time of discharge, when the applicant is briefed that their discharge will automatically be upgraded after six months.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00303

    Original file (FD-2010-00303.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX. Because member’ discharge file was unavailable to the Board for review, the Board was unable to conclusively ascertain the nature of misconduct on member’s part that formed the basis for the discharge. The DRB concluded that the characterization of the applicant’s discharge was appropriate due to the misconduct.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00133

    Original file (FD-2009-00133.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW >) COUNSEL °.."''| NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL HON GEN “UO” THC OTHER X Xx x x x ISSUES A94 00 UNG A UVEEE A67 10 d ae a EXHIBITS SUBMITT ED TO THE THE BOARD ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00156

    Original file (FD-2009-00156.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND GR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTE OF THE:BOARD MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY xX x x x SS ws 7 jl — ms mm Tr a 5 ms ae Tn ISSUES A93.19 INDEX NUMBER AG67.10 EXHIBITS SU MIL EES A93.23 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THEBOARD A94.05 2 APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00530

    Original file (FD-2008-00530.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTEOR-TIEE- BOARD HON GEN UOTHC / OTHER DENY x Xx x Xx L _| x | Issues SaaS NUMER rr = : “ED TO THE ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUM A67.00 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THI BOARD 1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00093

    Original file (FD-2009-00093.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIMF OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 01 Jul 2010 FD-2009-00093 CC OAPPLICANT’SASSUB AND. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive contributions he made in his Air Force career. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00030

    Original file (FD-2009-00030.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE - xX RECORD REVIEW eco a __ Te at oo NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ e+ e+ xr Xa+ ISSUES A94.01 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 ea Nl ae A93.01 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD __ 2 [APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION . *Reason and Authority +Reenlistment Code SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00078

    Original file (FD-2009-00078.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    *Reason and Authority +Reenlistment Code EUR SOT a f s NE TO: FROM: ; SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL Ban EES AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD §50 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00078 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason...