Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00317
Original file (FD-2010-00317.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN
| PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW
. NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
MEMBER SITTING ‘Hon | GEN. | voTHC | OTHER | DENY
xX
Xx
Xx
Xx
x
ISSUES A94.06 INDEX NUMBER A67.03 oe Be . ‘ : ee a BF d a Eee eae Oe
A92.35 U . 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
A92.02 2. | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
24 May 2012 FD-2010-00317
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.

 

   

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

    
   
   
 

SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00317

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDING: The discharge is upgraded to general.

ISSUE: Applicant received an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge for
Misconduct — Commission of a Serious Offense

Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was based on an isolated incident. Additionally, he
states that his discharge did not take into account the good things he did while in the service. The records
indicated the applicant was convicted under a summary court martial, received one Article 15, two Letters of
Reprimand, one Letter of Counseling, and one Record of Individual Counseling. His misconduct included
attempted theft from AAFES, solicited an airman to steal from AAFES (2x), failed to report in after
emergency leave, failed to maintain dorm room standards (3x), disobeyed an order (3x), failed to perform
duties, misuse of government travel card, and failure to pay debt on government travel card. The DRB took
note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of

recommendation and other accomplishments. Although the Board did not condone the applicant’s
misconduct, they found that based on his entire record and personal circumstances at the time of discharge a
UOTHC discharge was too harsh and concluded a General discharge more appropriately characterized the
applicant’s service.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

However, in view of the foregoing findings, the Board concludes that the overall quality of applicant’s

service is more accurately reflected by an Under honorable Conditions (General) under the provisions of
Title 10, USC 1553.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00042

    Original file (FD-2009-00042.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE.BOARL’S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD. SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, FE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00042 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. ...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00343

    Original file (FD-2010-00343.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and authority for discharge, and to change of reenlistment code are denied. Attachment: Examiner's Brief CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00343 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00575

    Original file (FD-2008-00575.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN _ AMN TYPE PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW BOUNSEL™ NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL — a VOTE.OF HON GEN UOTHC xe XFL X*4 xe+ xe ISSUES A94,53 INDEX NUMBER 67.90 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD HES? The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00092

    Original file (FD-2009-00092.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” VOTE OF THE BOARD a HON GEN UOTHC OTHER [ DENY xX x x x x ISSUES 4.94.95 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 BS Oo CEXETBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD oe LI JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD __ _ 2 [APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3_ [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION _ 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 24 Jun 2010 FD-2009-00092 APPL! FINDING: The Board denies the...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00025

    Original file (FD-2009-00025.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge. Applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his/her discharge. The DRB took note of the applicant's duty performance as documented by his performance reports, letters of recommendation and other accomplishments.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00463

    Original file (FD-2008-00463.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    / NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL “ NOTHOPTHEBOARD) = HON GEN UOTHC OTHER x¥+ Met xA+ e+ Xt ISSUES A95.00 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 a EXTUBIT SSUBMITTED tO "TE (RD me A93.11 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD _ A01.00 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00052

    Original file (FD-2009-00052.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE AFSN/SSAN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL PERE es ce ee Oe HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x xX INDEX NUMBER ISSUES 494.05 A67.10 HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER FD-2009-00052 application to the AFBCMR. AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) i SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00539

    Original file (FD-2008-00539.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW |] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL ae VOTE OF THE BOARD ~~ ca HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY XH KFT X*+ X*+ ISSUES A92.21 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 a “EX DIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD oe A93.01 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00001

    Original file (FD-2009-00001.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ISSUES A93.01 INDEX NUMBER A84.00 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD A94,55 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL VILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 17 Dec 2009 FD-2009-00001 APPLICANT'S ISSUE-AND THE:BOARD'S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE:ATTACHED AIR FORCEDISCHARGE REVIEW:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00016

    Original file (FD-2009-00016.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL” "| aM OF COUNSEL ANDOR ORGANIZATION - ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL - OY GXOTE OF THE BOARD: c HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY — cra _ - = Xx x x x x ISSUES INDEX NUMBER ~ 7 G CESSIRITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD. 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE . FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.