AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW
NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
X
Xx
Xx
xX
x
t IN i O oe
ISSUES A94.55 DEX NUMBER A67.30 bie EN TO THE BOARD = :
1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
08 May 2012 FD-2009-00024
Case heard in Washington, D.C.
Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an
application to the AFBCMR.
Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request.
SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous
CASE NUMBER
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00024
GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.
The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.
FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct — Civilian Conviction
Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. She states the statements she made
to the Japanese interpreters were translated inaccurately and falsely led to her conviction. The records
indicated the applicant was found guilty of use of a stimulant at or near Camp Foster Okinawa, Japan and
cultivation of marijuana in her residence on Camp Foster, Okinawa, Japan. The applicant was sentenced to
one year and six months imprisonment with hard labor, suspended for three years. Additionally, the
applicant met an administrative discharge board at Kadena Air Base, Okinawa Japan on January 29, 2002.
The administrative discharge board considered the allegations and found the allegations were supported by
the evidence. The DRB found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the
applicant's duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety
or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.
CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.
Attachment:
Examiner's Brief
AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00024
The Board found the commander’s decision to initiate administrative action is supported by the evidence in the record and concludes the discharge was appropriate. The Board found no evidence available in the record and none was presented by the applicant to warrant a change of the discharge. The Board found no evidence to substantiate to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00376
The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board finds the applicant submitted no issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge, and after a thorough review of the record, the Board was unable to identify any that would justify a change of discharge. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity...
AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2006-00403
X=Change Reason and Authority and Reenlistment Code a “TO: SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2006-00403 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00343
FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and authority for discharge, and to change of reenlistment code are denied. Attachment: Examiner's Brief CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00343 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. FINDING: The requests to upgrade the discharge, to change of reason and...
AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00250
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AIC TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x x x Xx x ISSUES A92.35 INDEX NUMBER A66.00 / : EXHIBITS SUB 1. |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL...
AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00278
SAF/MRBR 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 X — Upgrade, Reason for Discharge, Reenlistment Code Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant’s request. FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge, change reason for discharge and change of the reenlistment code are denied. The Board finds that neither the evidence of record...
AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00203
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION TYPE GEN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE SRA AFSN/SSAN x RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X X Xx X X ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 ee A I ae 1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3_|LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00530
OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTEOR-TIEE- BOARD HON GEN UOTHC / OTHER DENY x Xx x Xx L _| x | Issues SaaS NUMER rr = : “ED TO THE ISSUES A94.53 INDEX NUM A67.00 EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THI BOARD 1 JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00092
” VOTE OF THE BOARD a HON GEN UOTHC OTHER [ DENY xX x x x x ISSUES 4.94.95 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 BS Oo CEXETBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD oe LI JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD __ _ 2 [APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3_ [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION _ 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 24 Jun 2010 FD-2009-00092 APPL! FINDING: The Board denies the...
AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00420
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AFSN/SSAN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW [AME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x xX x x aac x ISSUES A93.23 INDEX NUMBER AO7. The Board found that the applicant’s contention pertaining to her mental disorders had no merit. After a thorough and complete review of her medical records, the Board was unable to...