Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00420
Original file (FD-2010-00420.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

AFSN/SSAN

 

PERSONAL APPEARANCE

 

xX RECORD REVIEW

 

 

[AME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION

 

ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY
x
xX
x
x
aac x
ISSUES A93.23 INDEX NUMBER AO7. 90 ; ; . :
A94.05 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
A93.09 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER
09 Aug 2012 FD-2010-00420

 

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

application to the AFBCMR.

 

 

SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at 1

 

 
   

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an

 

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00

(EF-V2)

Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2010-00420

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined
and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: Applicant received.a General discharge for A pattern of Misconduct — Conduct Prejudicial to Good
Order and Discipline

Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh. She states she was going through
some extreme personal problems that contributed to her misconduct. Additionally, she contends that she has
been diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder and major depression and feels that these mental disorders
explain her actions. The records indicated the applicant received one Article 15, two Letters of Reprimand,
and five Records of Individual Counseling. Her misconduct included failed to account for tools in
composite tool kit, failed to go to duty on time (4x), failed to document aircraft maintenance was performed,
failed to follow technical orders, and failed to secure classified material. The Board found that the
applicant’s contention pertaining to her mental disorders had no merit. After a thorough and complete
review of her medical records, the Board was unable to find any evidence to support this contention, nor did
the applicant provide any supporting documentation. The DRB opined that through these administrative
actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change her negative behavior. The Board concluded that
the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive contributions she made in her Air
Force career. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

The Board highly recommends that if the applicant can provide additional documented information to
substantiate her issue(s), that she should consider exercising her right to make a personal appearance before
the Board. If the applicant chooses to exercise this right, she should be prepared to provide the DRB with
factual evidence of the inequity/impropriety and any exemplary post-service accomplishments as well as any
contributions to the community.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2007-00404

    Original file (FD2007-00404.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN = TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE 4 RECORD REVIEW 4] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL Bea oe MEMBER SITTING HON GEN uoTHC | OTHER | DENY — xX x x x x 7 =e ISSUES A92.01 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 ee : E t 94.05 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2006-00403

    Original file (FD2006-00403.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    X=Change Reason and Authority and Reenlistment Code a “TO: SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2006-00403 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00239

    Original file (FD2008-00239.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AMN TYPE ~GEN | _ PERSONAL APPEARANCE i x | RECORD REVIEW < ) 4) NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL YES No xX MEMBER SITTING ISSUES A01.13 INDEX NUMBER A66.00 1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 [APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 [BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD | TADDITIONAL EXHIBITS...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00203

    Original file (FD2008-00203.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION TYPE GEN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE SRA AFSN/SSAN x RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X X Xx X X ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 ee A I ae 1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3_|LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00191

    Original file (FD2008-00191.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE , TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 07 Jul 2009 FD-2008-00191 APPLICANT'S. X = Upgrade, Reason for Discharge and Reenlistment Code INDORSEMENT — ae DATE: 7/14/21 To: } FROM: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL SAF/MRBR AIR FORCE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00268_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00268_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearance beforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgrade ofthe discharge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinary...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00250

    Original file (FD2008-00250.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AIC TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW COUNSEL NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL VOTE OF THE BOARD MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x x x Xx x ISSUES A92.35 INDEX NUMBER A66.00 / : EXHIBITS SUB 1. |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 | APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00545

    Original file (FD-2008-00545.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL AFSN/SSAN NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION VOTE OF MEBs GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY _ EXHIBITS SUBM ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The Board finds that neither the evidence of...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00103

    Original file (FD-2009-00103.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN po AMN TYPE GEN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW ks | NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL me ae “VOTE OF THE BO cue Pepi eae tla ROR HON GEN UOTHC xX x x X ISSUES Ag 4 gs INDEX NUMBER A67.10 a SS TS SUB} ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00092

    Original file (FD-2009-00092.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” VOTE OF THE BOARD a HON GEN UOTHC OTHER [ DENY xX x x x x ISSUES 4.94.95 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 BS Oo CEXETBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD oe LI JORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD __ _ 2 [APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3_ [LETTER OF NOTIFICATION _ 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER 24 Jun 2010 FD-2009-00092 APPL! FINDING: The Board denies the...