Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00268_13
Original file (FD-2013-00268_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
,FIRST MIDDLE JNITIAL)   GRADE


X        RECORD REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL



MEMBER SITTING

HON

GEN      UOTHC

OTHER    DENY
x x x x
x


ISS\JES

A92.21 A94.05 A93.09

INDEX NUMBER

A67.10


ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEA.RANCE HEARING


HEARING DATE     CASE NUMBER

19 Jul 2013

FD-2013--00268


Case heard in Washington,D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.











SAF/MRBR
550C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742
SEOlETARY OFTH£ AIR FORCE P£RSONNl!L COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
!SJ!COMWND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR
ANDREWS AFB,MD 1A)762·7001


AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00         (EF-V2Previous



AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE
CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00268

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.
ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct -Minor Disciplinary Infractions

Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was too harsh based on her being the victim of domestic abuse. The records indicated the applicant received two Article 15s, one Vacation, and one Letter of Reprimand. Her misconduct included misuse of Government travel Card, failed to refrain from using personal cell phone while performing extra duties, failed to refrain from using personal cell phone while on duty, and disrespect to a SNCO. Although the Board was sympathetic to the applicant's personal situation, the DRB opined that through these administrative actions, the applicant had ample opportunities to change her negative behavior. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant's service outweighed the positive contributions she made in her Air Force career. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate.

The DRB was pleased to see that the applicant was doing well, volunteering in her community, and completed her college degree. However, no inequity or impropriety in her discharge was suggested or found in the course of the hearing. The Board concluded the misconduct of the applicant appropriately characterized her term of service.

The Board highly recommends that if the applicant can provide additional documented information to substantiate her issue(s), that she should consider exercising their right to make a personal appearance before the Board. Ifthe applicant chooses to exercise this right, she should be prepared to provide the DRB with factual evidence of the inequity/impropriety and any exemplary post-service accomplishments as well as any contributions to the community.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00492_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00492_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDOR ORGANIZATIONOPCOUNSELA92.21A93.0lINDEXNUMBERHON GEN UOTl;IC OTHER 1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2 APPLICATION FORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONALAPPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARINGDAH CASENVMllER03Oct2013FD-2013-00492Caseheardin Washington,D.C.Adviseapplicantofthedecision oftheBoard,theright...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00545

    Original file (FD-2008-00545.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE X RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL AFSN/SSAN NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION VOTE OF MEBs GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY _ EXHIBITS SUBM ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE LETTER OF NOTIFICATION BRIEF OF PERSONNEL. FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge. The Board finds that neither the evidence of...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00212_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00212_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDLAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL)GRADE ..- PERSONALAPPEARANCE---- x RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDOR ORCANIZATIONOFCOUNSELMEMBERSIITINGGENUOTHC OTHER DENY 1 ORDERAPPOINTINGTHEBOARD2APPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4 BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASETOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOFPERSONAL APPFARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCEHEARINGHEAIUNCDATE CASE l\1JMll £ R19Jul2013...

  • AF | DRB | CY2015 | FD-2014-00767

    Original file (FD-2014-00767.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appealsforupgradeof dischargetoHonorableTheapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbe completedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.The attachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothe discharge.FINDING: TheBoarddeniesthe upgradeofthedischarge.ISSUE: TheapplicantreceivedaGeneral dischargeforMisconduct-...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2009-00014

    Original file (FD-2009-00014.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    *Reason and Authority + Reenlistment Code c SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL SAF/ MRBR cee oc oveene AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1438 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2009-00014 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00416_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00416_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbased ontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge. ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct- MisrepresentationApplicantcontendsthereasonfordischargeisinequitable.

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00394

    Original file (FD-2010-00394.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record. The Board found the no impropriety to warrant upgrade of the discharge and opined the characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to be appropriate. Issue #3 - Applicant contends her discharge was inequitable because the other individual was discharged under the force shaping program...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00768

    Original file (FD-2013-00768.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable.TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbriefcontainsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00794

    Original file (FD-2013-00794.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AffiFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORD NAMEOFSERVICE MEMBER (LAST,FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)GRADE AFSNISSANX RECORDREVIEWADDRESSANDORORCANIZATION OF COUNSEL xMEMBERSITTINGGEN UOTHCOTHER DENY xISSUESA94 .55INDEXNUIBERA67.10hlBITSSllBMJTfEDTO'!HE ARDORDERAPPOINTING TllE BOARDAPPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3 LEITEROFNOTIFICATION4BRlEfOFPERSONNELFILECOUNSEL'SRELEASETOntEBOARDADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTEDAT TIME OFPERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPGRSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHE,.RINODA1'E...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00344_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00344_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIRFORCEDISCHARGEREVIEWBOARDHEARINGRECORDNAMEOFSERVICEMEMBER(LAST,FIRSTMIDDLEINITIAL) GRADEX RECORD REVIEWADDRESSAND OR ORGANIZATION OFCOUNSEL _.....-- - - -..._,.,...... MEMBERSITTING GEN UOTHCOTHER DENYISSUESA93.23 AOl.43INDEXNUMBERA60.00ORDERAPPOINTINGTHE BOARDAPPLICATIONFORREVIEWOFDISCHARGE3LETTEROFNOTIFICATION4BRIEFOFPERSONNELFILE COUNSEL'SRELEASE TOTHEBOARDADDITIONALEXHIBITSSUBMITTEDATTIMEOF PERSONAL APPEARANCETAPERECORDINGOFPERSONALAPPEARANCE HEARINGHEARINGDATE...