Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00239
Original file (FD2008-00239.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN
AMN
TYPE ~GEN | _ PERSONAL APPEARANCE i x | RECORD REVIEW
<
) 4) NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
YES No
xX
MEMBER SITTING
ISSUES A01.13 INDEX NUMBER A66.00
1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 [APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4 [BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
| TADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
4.
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING
HEARING DATE CASE NUMBER T
01 Jul 2009

FD-2008-00239

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

 

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an

application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant

cIcN ATIDEIOE

Ee

TO: ] FROM: a
SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40

RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742

’s request.

RNOARN PREAINENT “7 f

&

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD

1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR

ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001

 

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00

(EF-V2)

Previous
CASE NUMBER

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE

   

FD-2008-00239

 
 
     
   
    
    
  
   
       
   
   
   
   
     
   
   
   
       
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
   

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined to
exercise this right.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDINGS: Upgrade of discharge is denied.

The Board finds that neither the evidence of record nor that provided by the applicant substantiates an
inequity or impropriety that would justify a change of discharge.

ISSUE:

  

Applicant contends discharge was improper because she never knowingly took illegal drugs while on active
duty. The applicant received a letter of reprimand for possession of an illegal narcotic. She was then
discharged for drug abuse. The applicant provided a statement to the AFOS] at the time of the investigation
stating that while she was at a nightclub, a person offered her and a friend a substance that she assumed was
a drug. In her statement to the AFOSI, the applicant stated that the individual who gave her the substance
assured her it would be out of her system within a day and that it would relax her. She stated she didn’t
know exactly what she was given but assumed it was a drug because of the environment she was in. After
taking a sip, she spit it back out. This statement to the AFOSI does not support the applicant’s contention
now that she never knowingly took a drug or that she assumed the substance was vodka or gin. The Board
concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive contributions she made
in her short Air Force career. The characterization of the discharge received by the applicant was found to
be appropriate.

  

If she can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, the applicant should consider
exercising her right to make a personal appearance before the Board. If she should choose to exercise her
right to a personal appearance hearing, the applicant should be prepared to provide the DRB with factual
evidence of the inequity and any exemplary post-service accomplishments as well as any contributions to the
community.

 

CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the
discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for
upgrade of discharge, thus the applicant's discharge should not be changed.

 

Attachment:
Examiner's Brief

Similar Decisions

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2007-00404

    Original file (FD2007-00404.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AFSN/SSAN = TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE 4 RECORD REVIEW 4] NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL Bea oe MEMBER SITTING HON GEN uoTHC | OTHER | DENY — xX x x x x 7 =e ISSUES A92.01 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 ee : E t 94.05 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2. The Board concluded that the negative aspects of the applicant’s service outweighed the positive...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2008-00576

    Original file (FD-2008-00576.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    * Change Reason and Authority + Change Reenlistment Code a ais : oo SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL a AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 32RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFR, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00576 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason...

  • AF | DRB | CY2014 | FD-2014-00018

    Original file (FD-2014-00018.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: Theapplicant appealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable. Theapplicant wasofferedapersonal appearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattached brief containsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicant andthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING: TheBoarddeniestheupgradeofthedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00034

    Original file (FD2008-00034.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    X — Upgrade and Reason for Discharge f) — SIGNATURE OF BOARD PRESIDENT "7" P” INDORSEMENT > SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2008-00034 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable and to...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00268_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00268_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicantappeals forupgradeofdischargetohonorable.Theapplicantwasofferedapersonal appearance beforetheDischarge ReviewBoard (DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedon theavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge. FINDING:TheBoarddeniestheupgrade ofthe discharge.ISSUE: ApplicantreceivedaGeneraldischargeforMisconduct-MinorDisciplinary...

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00471

    Original file (FD2008-00471.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN AIC TYPE GEN | PERSONAL APPEARANCE x RECORD REVIEW NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL The American Legion . ~ see ee ees MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X*+ L — _ | —__| [ xt X*t+ X*+ ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 1 |ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2 |APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3 |LETTER OF NOTIFICATION (a BRIEF OF...

  • AF | DRB | CY2010 | FD-2010-00420

    Original file (FD-2010-00420.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD AFSN/SSAN PERSONAL APPEARANCE xX RECORD REVIEW [AME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY x xX x x aac x ISSUES A93.23 INDEX NUMBER AO7. The Board found that the applicant’s contention pertaining to her mental disorders had no merit. After a thorough and complete review of her medical records, the Board was unable to...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00440_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00440_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL:Theapplicant appealsforupgrade ofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclined andrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord. Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinent dataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.

  • AF | DRB | CY2009 | FD2008-00203

    Original file (FD2008-00203.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) PERSONAL APPEARANCE NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION TYPE GEN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD GRADE SRA AFSN/SSAN x RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL MEMBER SITTING HON GEN UOTHC OTHER DENY X X Xx X X ISSUES A94.05 INDEX NUMBER A67.10 ee A I ae 1_|ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD 2_|APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE 3_|LETTER OF NOTIFICATION 4 |BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE...

  • AF | DRB | CY2013 | FD-2013-00335_13

    Original file (FD-2013-00335_13.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    GENERAL: The applicantappealsforupgradeofdischargetohonorable. TheapplicantwasofferedapersonalappearancebeforetheDischargeReviewBoard(DRB)butdeclinedandrequeststhatthereviewbecompletedbasedontheavailableservicerecord.Theattachedbrief containsavailablepertinentdataontheapplicantandthefactorsleadingtothedischarge.FINDING:...